• Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • TikTok
  • Contact Us
Community Land & Water Coalition, Inc.
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Grassroots Organizing & Advocacy
    • Indigenous Rights and Culture
    • CLWC Leadership
    • Contact Us
  • Support Us
    • Ways to Support CLWC
    • Donate
  • Our Work
    • Stop Sand Mining
    • Protecting Wetlands, Waterways and Drinking Water
    • Forests & Biodiversity
    • Responsible Solar & Energy Siting
    • Take Action Right Now!
  • Resources
    • In the Press
    • Education
    • Blog
    • Podcasts
    • YouTube Channel
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Calendar
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: Pine Barrens

59 Federal Road, Carver MA: A.D. Makepeace Continues Mining, Residents Say Enough is Enough

August 24, 2026

For decades, Carver residents have dealt with sand blowing onto their homes, yards, cars, streets, and neighborhoods, while expressing concerns about their drinking water and public health to state and local officials for years.

February 17, 2026: Community stands up to 10 years of sand mining at 59 Federal Road in residential neighborhoods

CLWC, researchers and residents document cumulative impacts to environment, health impacts from Silica Dust and harms to residents

CLWC 2026.02.13  comments are here

CLWC Exhibits to Comment Letter

ERC allows AD Makepeace to continue mining

Over 22 years, 11 cubic yards of sand and gravel mining by AD Makepeace Co. along Federal Road alone, more in other towns and areas of Carver. 

AD Makepeace Co. of Wareham mines the sand on its land to supply its subsidiary, Read Custom Soils located at 46 Federal Road. An overview of Read is here and legal efforts taken can be found here. 

In January, 2025, the  Carver ERC considered issuing a cease and desist for sand mine at 59 Federal Rd. then backs down — allows business as usual, while residents are exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica, dust, noise and unsafe road conditions.

Below: AD Makepeace mining operation, December 2025, 59 Federal Road, Carver MA. Exposed groundwater is visible in the lower right and middle left. Vast areas of Carver Loamy Course Soil, a source of Respirable Silica Dust, are visible. View the drone footage of December 2025 here.

Read more about the health hazards of Respirable Crystalline Silica dust here. 

Makepeace’s 2024 proposed expansion for more “cranberry agriculture” at 59 Federal Road, Carver

In 2024, AD Makepeace applied to the ERC to expand the massive 85 acre mine at 59 Federal Road,  including dredging in the Aquifer. The plans are on hold, according to Makepeace.

Below: Makepeace proposed expansion, 2024.

  • Makepeace’s proposed expansion at 59 Federal Road will be 650 feet from residential drinking water wells; GAF Engineering relies 30-year-old report to claim mining won’t harm wells

  • Makepeace withdrew plans after public hearing, but continues mining 85 acre site, below. 

Above: June 15, 2024: 59 Federal Road, Carver, MA. The Cranberry Village neighborhood is at the bottom of the picture.  In 2024, Makepeace filed a permit application to expand the mine to the southwest. As of May 2025, it has been withdrawn. The mining began in about 2016 with the clearing of land and mining sand and gravel for the solar project seen in the top of the photo. Read more about the solar project here. 

Drone Video here. 

Recent Events

October 1, 2024 Town of Carver ERC Public Hearing

“I have attended almost every Earth Removal Committee meeting since 2021. I have heard every cranberry company, trucking company and the Earth Removal Commitee members misrepresent massive sand mining projects as “cranberry agriculture” or “subdivisions.” These are half-truths and part of a coordinated effort to strategically misrepresent sand mining to evade local bylaws.”

-Attorney Meg Sheehan, CLWC

“I’m actually here to ask for a moratorium on the sand mining so that it can be studied—not just the Earth removal plans, but the whole operation of sand mining and how it’s affecting our area, the wildlife, the waters, and the people who live here.  It’s just an enormous operation… it’s a wasteland. It’s loud… there’s humming and beeping… I think about all the creatures that are being dug up and the aquifer that’s threatened.”

                                  -Linda Jacobs, neighbor and resident of Cranberry  Village, Carver MA

“ I hope that we aren’t just going to pretend that these things aren’t happening down there, because they are and I think most of us know that.”

“It’s just extremely upsetting to me that the town seems to, as the woman said before me, favor big business over human beings.”

“I wish the town would pay as much attention to projects that impact our community’s wellbeing as they do to debating the zoning of business signs”.

Carver residents at Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing, 5/29/24

 

Impacts to drinking water, no study ever done! 

“I don’t know about anyone else, but I don’t think I could afford water being piped in from another town.. A lot of people like Carver because we have well water. And we want to protect our water”. 

—Cranberry Village resident at Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing on 5/29/2024 on petition to shut down Makepeace’s Read Custom Soils trucking terminal on Federal Road.

Read more about the impacts to the aquifer ” Report from world renown hydrologist, Scott Horsley here. 

Impacts of sand dust, noise, vibrations

Residents in South Carver are a ground zero for AD Makepeace’s industrial scale sand mining. The mining is getting  ever closer to homes. 

 Read Custom Soils, 46 Federal Road, trucking depot for AD Makepeace sand mining operations

Read Custom Soils, Makepeace’s sand distribution operation, is across from Cranberry Village at 46 Federal Road. Read more about Read Custom Soils here.

Environmental Justice neighborhoods

Below: Map of Environmental Justice communities in Carver. Blue represents Makepeace’s sand mining site at 59 Federal Road. The yellow areas two EJ neighborhoods that directly abut Makepeace’s 59 Federal Road mining site.

Above: AD Makepeace mining site at 59 Federal Road abutting Cranberry Village to the right. Sand covers homes and cars, vibrations from tree clearing and mining shake homes,  dangerous truck traffic threatens safety.

 

 

Find out how to take action here

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/sand_1.jpg 616 1200 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2026-08-24 01:19:172026-08-23 13:45:5259 Federal Road, Carver MA: A.D. Makepeace Continues Mining, Residents Say Enough is Enough
Sign at the entrance announces "Pit 40" and that the Site is regulated as a mine by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration

Plymouth: Sand Mine at 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Destroys Environment, Native American Site

November 30, 2025

Above: Dec. 3, 2025:  Sand mining destroying Cedarville Conservation Area and Native American Site at 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth MA

Above: October 15, 2025: Sand mining destroying Cedarville Conservation Area and Native American Site at 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth MA. Drone videos available on YouTube here.

 

Background

Updated November, 2025

A vast tract of land known as the Cedarville Conservation Area and the Native American Wampanoag Great Lot at 71 Hedges Pond Road in Plymouth, Massachusetts is being strip mined for valuable sand and gravel. The Site is shown above in the aerial photo as of October, 2025. A private “non-profit” and regional sand mining company started clearing the land in January, 2025. The Town Select Board sold this public land to a private entity, the Plymouth Foundation, for $1.00 in 2022.

The current owner, a shell corporation named Standish Investment Group, LLC, is excavating and selling sand and gravel, starting at the top of the 150-foot hill and excavating down 90 feet deep across the Site. The sand and gravel is estimated to have a value of $12 million according to sources.

The land sale and sand mining permitting by the Town of Plymouth happened behind closed doors in secret deals involving the Select Board, Town Manager, and Town Planner. Despite the sale of this public land, the public was not made aware of the sand mining plan until late 2024 when the then owner, Plymouth Economic Development Foundation and future owner, Standish, started applying for permits. In applying for municipal permits, Standish and the Foundation claimed this was merely a plan for a “unified complex” of warehouse style buildings. It just so happened that these plans required leveling the 33 acre site and digging a 90′ hole to extract a massive volume of sand and gravel.

Against the backdrop of the extensive ongoing and historic sand mining devastating the region, the public saw through this scheme immediately. They started demanding answers.

Since late 2024, multi-pronged advocacy efforts to challenge and halt the sand mining, focusing on environmental protection, historic preservation, and procedural violations of state and municipal laws, has been underway. These efforts have resulted in extensive community mobilization and generated important court rulings. In Plymouth, they have resulted in a call to review the Town’s sand and gravel mining permit scheme. Some are calling for a complete prohibition on sand mining, as allowed under state law.

The Town refuses to shut down the mine and it is business as usual with this sand mine and others or demand an accurate independent assessment of the real volume of sand and gravel being mined and its value.

This Blog summarizes the public advocacy, issues, lawsuits,  who is involved, and future efforts to stop the destruction.

Key Facts

Background and Land Sale for Sand Mining

The land is located in the southeast part of Plymouth known as Cedarville Village. This is public land owned by Plymouth residents.  Yet, in a bait and switch, the Select Board sold the land to a private non-profit, the Plymouth Foundation for $1.00. The Foundation, using public resources and taxpayer money, subdivided the land. It then sold one of the lots to EJ Pontiff, a sand mine operator, for $3.4 million in early 2025. Read more about the Plymouth Foundation here.

This area of Plymouth has some of the last remaining areas of valuable silica sand and the surrounding sand and gravel aggregate. Decades of sand and gravel mining has leveled the topography of the Town. This mining is ongoing, as the sand and gravel industry tries to extract every shovelful for sale.

This sand mine, like others, was approved by the Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals, who claims it is merely “necessary and incidental” to normal land development.

The groundbreaking report, Sand Wars in Cranberry Country: The Money, Politics and Corrupution Behind the Silent Environmental Crisis in Southeastern Massachusetts documents approximately 41 sand mines in Plymouth alone. Some of the sand mines involve the same entities mining at 71 Hedges Pond Road — the Plymouth Foundation and E.J. Pontiff.

The 19-acre site off Route 3 in Plymouth — a “unified complex” of commercial buildings — is also a ruse for a sand mine. Four years later the Route 3 “unified complex” is a wasteland and barren sand pit. See the drone video here.

About the Hedges Pond Road Site

The Hedges Pond Road sand mine is an egregious example of the abuse of sand mining laws. The land is or was important for the following reasons:

  • Designated on official Town and state maps as the Cedarville Conservation Area — open space for recreation, hiking and wildlife habitat.
  • Historically and as of today, the area is part of the ancient Native American Wampanoag Great Lot. This is an area of land ‘allotted’ to Native Americans. Under the colonial government of Massachusetts, Native American communal lands used for traditional life ways such as hunting, fishing and gathering, were eliminated and Native Americans were required to live on the ‘lots’ assigned to them by the government.
  •  Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) Priority Habitat #521 for Rare Species.
  • Globally Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens forest.
  • Abutting residential neighborhoods.

Destruction of Native American Great Lot

Perhaps the most egregious aspect of this land destruction is that the Town and state allowed it to proceed without an archeological study. They rejected requests from the Wampanoag Tribes.

The Native American tribes,  Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe have ancestral lands that encompass the Site. The Tribes have spoken directly to Town and State officials seeking protection of this land.

“We oppose this project and the development of this area on Hedges Pond Road,” said Melissa Ferretti, Chairwoman of the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe based in Plymouth, which was called Patuxet by Indigenous People. “This location is an integral part of our original reservation lands known to us as the “Great Lot.” This project threatens to irreversibly damage our ancestral homelands, the heart of our existence and heritage here in Plymouth. The Great Lot holds immense cultural and historic significance for  our community and any development would not only harm the land but also disrupt our deep-rooted connection to it. Honoring the sacredness of these grounds is fundamental to our community and culture,” Ferretti stated. In November 2024, Governor Healy issued an Executive Order granting the Tribe state recognition, a major accomplishment.

 

Speaking at the February 11, 2025 Town of Plymouth Select Board meeting, Indigenous youth urged the Town to, “At least consider and possibly even invite people from her tribe and other neighboring sister tribes to have discussions about these matters and include them in them.”

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Chief Brian Weeden testified at the April 7, 2025 public hearing to the Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals:

“This is happening right in our own backyard. And it is our duty to speak on behalf of our sister tribes. And it’s—it’s not appropriate because, you know, you all have been robbing graves for the past 400 years since you stepped off that boat”…“But enough is enough. If somebody was digging up your grandparents and your great ancestors, what would you do?”.

 

 

April 7, 2025 Plymouth Town Hall: Mashpee Wampanoag Chairman Brian Weeden addresess Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals. Available on You Tube at 1:16:05. 

A February 13, 2025 letter in the Plymouth Independent describes how the project tramples Indigenous rights.

Advocacy & Lawsuits

Overview

Months of grassroots advocacy at all levels of government did not stop the illegal sale of the Conservation Area to Standish Investment by the Foundation. It did not stop the Town of Plymouth from issuing permits. Land clearing and logging started in early 2025.

The Town refused to issue a cease and desist for a pause for an archeological study to be conducted and to have questions answered.

With no option but the courts, residents and the grassroots group Community Land & Water Coalition filed lawsuits to obtain justice for the community and the environment.

A writer to the Plymouth Independent says the Plymouth Foundation, not taxpayers, should pay the legal fees of these challenges.

As of November 2025, three major legal challenges are pending. These are summarized below.

Below: Logging Cedarville Conservation Area, Feb. 2025. 

Damage to the Environment Lawsuit

Lawsuit filed April, 2025

On April 17, 2025, a Group of More than Ten Residents filed a lawsuit in Superior Court under the state’s Citizen Suit Law for Damage to the Environment in violation of environmental protection laws. See the complaint here: More Than Ten Residents v Town of Plymouth and Others. The lawsuit followed a  Notice of Intent to Sue issued to Standish, the Foundation, Town and Attorney General on March 28, 2025. The notice letter was ignored by all of them. CLWC’s March 28, 2025 Press Release here describes the Citizen Suit law and the claims in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges the Select Board, Town Manager and Town Planner failed to follow the steps for selling conservation land according to the lawsuit. It seeks to halt all activity, void the land sale, and compel restoration of the site or mitigation.

Court denies injunction, June, 2025

In late April, 2025, the Group’s lawyers asked the Court for an injunction to shut down the mine pending the outcome of the lawsuit.  April 29, 2025, the Group submitted its Memorandum supporting the request for an injunction here.

The  Group also submitted three affidavits about the values of the Conservation Area and how the public used it for open space and recreation and its importance to the Wampanoag people. The affidavits testified that residents used the Cedarville Conservation Area for hiking and recreation during the 21 years since it was established in 1993. This established its status as conservation land that could not be sold without a 2/3 vote of the state Legislature and other steps.

The Town, Standish, and the Foundation hit back with an Emergency Motion to Continue (here) and their Memo in Support of the Motion to Continue (here).

On May 2, 2025, the Court held a hearing on the injunction. The court room was filled to capacity with concerned residents. Attorney Caroline Smith from the Boston environmental law firm of McGregor, Legere and Stevens argued for the Group that the injunction is urgently needed to prevent further damage to the environment by the sand mining operation.

The Town, Foundation and Standish challenged the Group’s standing and timeliness, while the Town argued the land was not protected open space. Lawyer Geoffrey Raux of the Boston law firm of Foley argued for Pontiff. Plymouth Town Counsel Kate McKay argued that the land was never in open space and recreation and therefore never protected. Attorney Smith countered with maps and the Town’s Open Space and Recreation plans listing the 40 acres as a permanently protected conservation area.

Before the hearing, residents and supporters held signs outside the courthouse and expressed their concern about sand mining in general throughout the region and the lack of accountability for this tragic destruction of forests and a Native American cultural site.

On June 18, 2025, Judge Glenny denied the injunction, allowing mining to proceed during litigation. This ruling meant ongoing environmental destruction was not halted by the court, exacerbating harm to the native ecosystem and cultural heritage. The denial did not stop the Group from pursuing the lawsuit.

Court sides with Group, denies motion to dismiss, November 2025

The Town, Foundation and Standish challenged the Group’s Damage to the Environment lawsuit with a “motion to dismiss.” Following a court hearing, on November 24, 2025, Judge Leighton ruled in favor of the Residents Group on three key points: standing, timeliness and the purpose of Article 97.

This is a major victory and allows the case  continue toward trial. Read the Decision here: Nov. 26, 2025 Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss

Read our press release here: 2025.12.01 Press Release

Zoning Violations Lawsuit

Background on Municipal Regulation of Sand Mining

Sand mining is regulated in the first instance at the municipal level in Massachusetts. This means local land use laws, either zoning or general bylaws, may control, limit or prohibit sand mining. Plymouth’s Zoning Bylaws have “Earth Removal Regulations” requiring different levels of permits depending on the size and purpose of the earth removal. This requires community engagement to ensure proper enforcement and administration of sand mining laws. The community engaged in months of efforts to stop the Hedges Pond Road sand mine.

Community advocacy included:

  • Public comments to the Planning Board;
  • A petition to the Select Board, Planning Board and Building Inspector to deny or require a special permit;
  • An appeal to the Building Inspector to issue a cease and desist once the clear cutting started, which was denied; and
  • An appeal to the ZBA and public hearings on the Building Inspector’s refusal to enforce the Zoning Law.

Read the CLWC Feb. 14, 2025  Press Release here on the Zoning Appeals

Town issues Zoning and Building Permit, January 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Town Building Inspector issued building and zoning permits to Standish Investments for a 300,000 square foot “unified complex” of warehouses, asserting that the earth removal (sand mining) was “necessary and incidental” “site preparation” for the massive warehouse style buildings. The buildings just happen to cooincide with the size of the lot — almost 33 acres. The Foundation and Pontiff immediately started sand mining in January 2025 once the permits were issued. These were issued behind closed doors — with no public notice.

The Permits did not include sufficient conditions to mitigate airborne silica dust, a known carcinogen, endangering public health and drinking water supplies for the entire area. The permits were issued despite the community’s request that the Town’s land use officials deny the sand mining as not allowed in the zoning district, or at least require a “special permit” — the highest level of protection. The commencement of the mining operation led to clear-cutting of ancient trees and major landscape disruption before the legal appeal period had expired. This prompted an emergency cease-and-desist demand. The ZBA and Building Inspector denied the cease and desist. Despite these appeals and public outcry, work continued.

Community seeks zoning enforcement, Town denies demand

In February 2025, CLWC’s legal staff and volunteers brought legal appeals at the Town level that demanded demand to halt operations were filed after the start of tree clearing. CLWC and residents argued that the project was proceeding without archaeological or environmental studies and in violation of state and federal protections for burial and historic sites. The appeal demanded a public hearing and challenged the town’s reliance on the “unified complex” pretext to avoid stricter special permitting and public scrutiny. See the 2/14/25 Notice of Appeal and  the 3/3/25 Appeal of Refusal to Issue Cease and Desist

See the Plymouth Independent March 1, 2025 story on the appeal here.

The Zoning Board of Appeals was required to hold hearings on whether to uphold the Zoning Permit. The ZBA process was criticized due to potential conflicts of interest; two ZBA members held director positions with the Plymouth Foundation, the original recipient of the land and permit.

The Plymouth Independent story on March 13, 2025 “Recusals Delay Appeal” described the conflicts of interest.

The appeal highlighted the project’s use of the “unified complex” designation to bypass stricter controls, and underscored deficiencies in transparency and public participation.

 

Above: May, 2025. Public packs the Plymouth Town Hall for a public hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals for a cease and desist of the sand mining at 71 Hedges Pond Road and demands a permit revocation.

Site Plans used to obtain permits

The site plans the Building Inspector relied on to issue the permits are defective, as shown below.  See the Pontiff/Standish’s permit submittals to the Town here:

Standish Investments 5/21/24 Submittal Letter 

Standish Investments 11/24 Revised Grading Plans 

Standish Investments 11/24 Flaherty & Stefani  Revised Plans Letter

Zoning Lawsuit filed 

 When the ZBA refused to enforce the Bylaw after the public hearings, CLWC and volunteers are representing neighbors harmed by the sand mining. They have brought a lawsuit challenging the ZBA Decision to allow the project without complying with the Bylaw. The case asserts:

  • The project is prohibited and violates the Zoning Bylaw because it is industrial use prohibited in the zoning district;
  • Alternatively, the ZBA should have required a Special Permit under the Earth Removal Regulation because the mining is not “necessary and incidental” to an end use that has all its permits;
  • The plans do not meet the Natural Features Conservation regulations of the Zoning Bylaw – for example it does not retain topography to maximum extent possible, allows destruction of historical lands of Native American Wampanoag people, has insufficient conditions to mitigate airborne silica dust, a known carcinogen, and is endangering public health and drinking water supplies for the entire area.

See the Zoning Lawsuit here.Chelsey Adams et al v Plymouth ZBA et al Complaint w Exhibits

The Town, Standish and the Foundation have moved to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of legal standing. They say the plaintiffs who live next to the mine cannot show any “harm.” The neighbors have submitted sworn court testimony of noise, dust and vibration being caused by the mining operation. Scott Hersey, PhD has submitted an affidavit stating that the sand is believed to be carcinogenic silica dust and the neighbors, if exposed, would suffer life long health impacts.

The case is scheduled for a hearing.

 Building Permit Appeal

In March, 2025, CLWC appealed the Town Building Inspector’s Building Permit under the Building Code to the Building Code Appeals Board (BCAB).

In expert testimony and legal arguments, CLWC identified major Massachusetts Building Code violations in the Town’s Building Permit. These include missing construction documents, inadequate fire safety plans, no geotechnical invesetigation and missing specifications for energy compliance.

Read more here about CLWC’s appeal:

  • Letter of Appeal t0 the BCAB 2025.07.08 BCAB 25-043 Appellants Memo_
  • CLWC’s testimony from A. Vernon Woodworth, FAIA Expert Testimony BCAB Hedges Pond Road July 2025
  • CLWC presentation to BCAB BCAB 25-043 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Plymouth Building Permit Appeal 7_10_2025 Presentation

Demanding Accountability

Plymouth Select Board

The Town’s Select Board is ultimately responsible for this unlawful and unnecessary environmental and cultural destruction of Plymouth’s landscape.   

The Select Board:

  • Sold the land to the Plymouth Foundation for $1.00;
  • Has consistently rejected public calls for accountability and transparency about the sale and sand mining, even treating Indigenous Youth and others with disrepect during a public hearing;
  • Went along with the Zoning Board of Appeals that refused to use its power to enforce the Earth Removal Regulation of the Zoning Bylaw;
  • Is responsible to ensure that the Building Inspector follows the Building Code: he did not;
  • Holds a director position on the Plymouth Foundation; and
  • Allows Town employees to serve on the Plymouth Foundation while working on the sand mining deal behind closed doors — the Town Manager, Town Planner, and members of boards and committees are on the Foundation.

The permits were issued despite the community’s request that the Town’s land use officials deny the sand mining as not allowed in the zoning district, or at least require a “special permit” — the highest level of protection.

 Plymouth Foundation

The Plymouth Foundation claims it is a private non profit and does not comply with the Open Meeting Law — yet it collects money from the sale of public lands. This is a shadow government, made up of developers that has been getting sand mining permits from the Town’s ZBA for decades — and collecting revenue from the sales.

CLWC published an expose report, Shining the Light on the Plymouth Foundation May 2025 

Plymouth Planning Board 

This is an elected board of the Town responsible for overseeing these projects. It went along with the scheme and issued a Recommendation that the project be approved in December 2024. The Board ignored the letter from the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe for an archeological study. See the 12/24 Herring Pond Letter here. It ignored the recommedation of the Cedarville Steering Committee to reject the project.

Plymouth Director of Inspectional Services

The director  issued zoning and building permits. 

The public sent over 1,000 letters demanding that the Director (Building Inspector) require a special permit under the Town’s Zoning Bylaw. This was ignored. The permits were issued without notifying the public.

Plymouth Conservation Commission

It approved a permit to destroy wetland with plan for “replication” — and based on material misrepresentations by the Foundation and Standish that “150 acres” had been permanently protected as conservation land as mitigation for the 33 acres of destruction – when this was not true. The Commission asked no questions. See the Commission’s documents:

Standish 6/24 NOI 

Commission 7/16/24 Meeting Minutes 

Commission 8/5/24 Order of Conditions 

E.J. Pontiff and companies

Pontiff has operated sand and gravel mines throughout the area for decades, including at 140 Firehouse Road in Plymouth. Currently, the company is expanding a 50-acre mine in Carver.

Timeline

Date Description
1977 The Town of Plymouth obtains the Cedarville Conservation Area property (Lots 22B, 23, and 24) by tax taking for the purpose of building a landfill, which is never built.
1993 – 2025 The Town designates the Cedarville Conservation Area for public use as open space and conservation land.
April 3, 1993 Town Meeting votes unanimously to change the purpose of the Cedarville Conservation Area land from municipal to open space/conservation purposes, dedicating it to conservation under the Conservation Commission.
1996 – 2017 Town Open Space Committee and Planning Board include the Conservation Area in their plans as dedicated for conservation purposes.
2018 Town Meeting votes on Articles 26 and 27 to transfer portions of the land between the Conservation Commission and the Board of Selectmen, requiring compliance with Article 97.
July 2022 The Select Board sells the Cedarville Conservation Area to the Plymouth Foundation for $1.00 without following Article 97 and other legal requirements.
January 16, 2025 The Town’s Building Inspector issues zoning and building permits to Standish Investments for a 300,000 square foot complex, including sand mining, at 71 Hedges Pond Road.
February 7, 2025 The Plymouth Foundation sells the Cedarville Conservation Area to Standish Investments LLC/Eric Pontiff for $3.4 million and provides a $350,000 mortgage to Pontiff.
February 11, 2025 Indigenous youth speak at the Select Board meeting, urging inclusion of tribes in discussions about the sand mining project.
February 14, 2025 Seven Wampanoag Nation members and six Plymouth residents file legal appeals challenging the Town’s permits for the sand mine and development at 71 Hedges Pond Road, and CLWC files a demand for a cease and desist after confirming that work began before the legal appeal period expired.
February 14, 2025 Tree clearing begins at 71 Hedges Pond Road, cutting down ancient trees on Wampanoag lands.
February 16, 2025 7:00 PM CLWC holds its second public forum on sand and gravel mining in Plymouth.
March 3, 2025 Second day of Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing on a proposal by PA Landers to expand a nearby sand and gravel mine, adjacent to 71 Hedges Pond Road.
March 24, 2025 Drone video shows the denuded Cedarville Conservation Area site after logging, stump removal, and grading by Standish Investments.
March 25, 2025 A Citizen Group of 24 residents delivers a Notice of Intent to Sue to the Select Board, Plymouth Foundation, and Standish Investments regarding the sand mining operation at 71 Hedges Pond Road.
March 28, 2025 Press release issued announcing the legal challenge to the sand mine under the Citizen Suit Law.
April 7, 2025 Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Chief Brian Weeden speaks at a public hearing, condemning the sand mining project and its impact on Native American graves and heritage.
April 7, 2025 6:00 PM Public hearing scheduled at Plymouth Town Hall regarding the zoning and building permits for the sand mining project.
April 17, 2025 After over seven months of advocacy, a group of More than Ten Residents files a lawsuit in Superior Court challenging the sand mining project.
April 19, 2025 Blog post or report date summarizing the lawsuit against the Town, Foundation, and Standish.
April 29, 2025 The Ten Residents submit a Memorandum of Law and three affidavits supporting their request for an injunction to halt the sand mining project.
May 2, 2025 Court hearing held on the Residents Group’s request for an injunction to stop the sand mining project, with arguments presented by both sides.
June 18, 2025 Judge Glenny denies the Group’s request for an injunction to stop the sand mining pending the outcome of the case.
November 25, 2025 Judge Leighton rules for the Group and against the Town, allowing the case to proceed to trial.

Find Out More

Press and Media

 

Cape Cod Times

March, 2025

 April 15, 2025

Plymouth Independent

February 12, 2025: Permit should not have been issued: Letter to the Editor

April 10, 2025: ZBA Votes

April 19, 2025 Opponents Sue

November 13, 2025: What is the Plymouth Foudation About?

 

Stay involved! Don’t let this happen again!

 

CLWC will continue to pursue accountability and appropriate mitigation for the tragic loss of the Cedarville Conservation Area and the Herring Pond Wampanoag Great Lot.

The Foundation, the Town, and EJ Pontiff claim this is a “unified complex” for a hockey rink, warehouse, and two lumber yards. The site is listed for sale. Are the new owners committed to these uses? Or was this “complex” concocted to obtain as much sand and gravel as possible?

 

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PIt-Sign-at-71-Hedges-Pond-Road.png 1418 2126 Meg Sheehan https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Meg Sheehan2025-11-30 05:59:062025-12-29 15:20:24Plymouth: Sand Mine at 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Destroys Environment, Native American Site

Carver Earth Removal Committee Must Deny Permits, Enforce Bylaw

November 2, 2025

Town of Carver, Earth Removal Committee

Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025 3 p.m. Public Meeting & Hearing

See the Agenda here.

 

E

TELL THE ERC TO DENY PERMITS

 PUBLIC COMMENT ALLOWED ON ITEMS 10 and 11

Excerpt from ERC Agenda:

PERMIT 1 –  0 MAYFLOWER ROAD/ADGA REALTY LLC

Read more here:  CLWC Letter to ERC Nov. 2, 2025 0 Mayflower Rd.

      • See the permit application here. It is for a 7.45 acre strip mine. Will dredge the Sole Source Aquifer, everyone’s drinking supply, for at least $7 million in sand.
      • Requires a wetlands permit which it does not have so ERC cannot issue the permit.
      • Impacts to Residents:
        • At least 37,500 truck loads, at least 3 years of work.
        • Excessive truck traffic, air pollution from sand dust, noise in Tremont St. area where there are already numerous sand mines  — EJ Pontiff Cranberries sand mine at 104 Tremont St., Edgewood Cranberry sand mine also on Tremont St.

 

PERMIT 2 – 25 FULLER STREET/ADGA REALTY LLC

Read more here: CLWC Letter to ERC Nov. 2, 2025 Fuller St.

        • The sand mining is already done, but AGDA seeks an  “after the fact” permit for 8,100 cubic yards. See the permit application here.
        • Sand mining has been going on here for years. CLWC seeks a complete audit of the volume of sand removed, the fees paid, and a wetlands investigation.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Screen-Shot-2023-07-25-at-10.56.16-AM-e1754081971988.png 263 318 Meg Sheehan https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Meg Sheehan2025-11-02 10:56:242025-12-29 16:41:55Carver Earth Removal Committee Must Deny Permits, Enforce Bylaw

Forest Fires in Massachusetts: Myths and Realities: Conference Oct. 4, 2025

October 13, 2025

 

This October 4, 2025 conference focused on government programs that “manage” public lands by  burning and logging.  Currently, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (DFW) are carrying out management plans across Massachusetts

Full video here.  

Watch individual experts’presentations here:

Introductory Slides

George Wuerthner, Ecologist. Video with Slides and Slides only.

David Foster, Director Emeritus of Harvard Forest and its Long Term Ecological Research program. Video with Slides and Slides only.

Michael Kellett, RESTORE: The North Woods. Video with Slides and Slides only.

Bill Stubblefield, Ph.D., Evolutionary Biology. Video with Slides and Slides only.

The conference was held at Plimoth Patuxet. The topic is of particular importance to the Plymouth, Carver and Wareham MA area because DCR and DFW are in year 8 of a 10 year plan to log and burn about 2,000 acres of Myles Standish State Forest and adjacent Wildlife Management Areas. Many of these areas are intact successional forests with rare species biodiversity, large game animals, streams, water bodies, and wildlife habitats.

In addition to the state logging and burning the Town of Plymouth has logged and burned about 40 acres in the Town Forest on Drew Road where DFW holds a conservation restriction.

 

Below: Plymouth Town Forest before and after logging and burning. 25 acres.

BEFORE: 2024                                                                                        AFTER: 2025


 

Logging and burning: a comparison

Below: Managing forests in Myles Standish State Forest, Plymouth. On the right is a forest that DCR clear-cut. The plan is to mow and burn it every 2-3 years to maintain this area. 

 

While state and local agencies justify controlled burning on the basis of public safety and ecological restoration are these reasons sound?

  • Do they justify the scope and scale of burning and logging on our public lands?
  • Does controlled burning have public safety benefits or are there other ways to protect the public from fires?
  • Who is measuring the before and after benefits to ecosystems and wildlife? Does logging and burning hundreds of acres to benefit a single species such as the Eastern Cottontail Rabbit or a single bird species justify the unknown impacts to the entire ecosystem?

Below: Logged and clear-cut area of Myles Standish State Forest, 2025. 

 Managing forests through logging and burning is promoted for safety, ecological and climate solutions.  Independent experts suggest there is little to support this. Evidence shows that these interventions worsen long-term fire risk.  In additions, managing forests for a single species, such as the Eastern Cottontail Rabbit in the Plymouth Town Forest does not adequately take into account the destruction of other species.

Below: Dr. Foster address the financial cost to taxpayers of managing forests using fire and logging.

A multi-faceted topic including Native American cultural practices

Forest fires and controlled burning is a multi-faceted topic. The October 4 conference addressed only issues dealing with current forest industry claims about safety and ecological restoration that lead to aggressive attempts to “fix’ nature. The cultural values and practices of Native Americans that preceded colonization and continue today provide a profoundly different approach to how we could live with nature.

The conference organizers and others hope to address the Native American use of fire as a cultural practice and traditional ecological knowledge. All are welcome to contact the organizers to help arrange future conferences.

Together, these conversations are helping to shape a more informed and ecologically respectful approach to how we understand and live with wildfire, and hopefully return our communal respect for, and relationship with, the natural planetary systems.

More about the speakers

  • George Wuerthner is an ecologist and photographer who has visited more than 400 designated wilderness areas and more than 200 National Park System units. For a dozen years, he worked as Ecological Projects Director for Doug Tompkins’s Foundation for Deep Ecology and is now Executive Director of Public Lands Media. He has published 38 books, including “Wildfire: A Century of Failed Forest Policy,” “Protecting the Wild: Parks and Wilderness Foundation for Conservation,” and “Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of the Earth.
  • David Foster is Director Emeritus of the Harvard Forest and its Long Term Ecological Research program and currently coordinates Wildlands, Woodlands, Farmlands and Communities. He serves on the editorial board of From the Ground Up. David’s research and conservation focus began with his PhD studies on fire history and ecology of the Labrador wilderness but has increasingly focused on the role of natural and anthropogenic forces, including fire, that have shaped the New England landscape over past millennia. He is an author most recently of “Meeting of Land and Sea: Nature and the Future of Martha’s Vineyard,” and “Wildlands of New England: Past Present and Future.
  • Michael Kellett is co-founder and executive director of RESTORE: The North Woods, a New England-based nonprofit organization. worked for 40 years to create national parks, save forests, and protect wildlife. He was the lead author of the paper, “Forest-clearing to create early-successional habitats: Questionable benefits, significant costs.”
  • Dr. William Stubblefield has a lifelong passion for natural history and holds a Ph.D. in Evolutionary Biology from Harvard University. He currently devotes his time to activism on behalf of all lifeforms on Planet Earth.

Below: “Habitat Restoration” in Myles Standish State Forest by DCR, October 2025 from DCR website.

Find out more:

BREAKING NEWS: November 3, 2025 request to EEA, MEPA Office for environmental review of logging in the Manuel Correllus State Forest on Martha’s Vineyard: _ _ _ MEPA Correllus_Foster_Ottens-Sargent (1)

Save Massachusetts Forests www.savemassforests.com
RESTORE: The Northwoods  www.restore.org
Standing Trees standingtrees.org

 

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png 0 0 Katherine Harrelson https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Katherine Harrelson2025-10-13 18:56:212025-12-29 15:22:37Forest Fires in Massachusetts: Myths and Realities: Conference Oct. 4, 2025

Carver: AD Makepeace expands mine at 46 Federal Road

May 29, 2025

June 18, 2026 BREAKING NEWS: Conservation Law Foundation announces intent to sue AD Makepeace Co. for wetlands violations in Plymouth

 

AD Makepeace’s wetlands filling at the Wankinko Bogs in Carver at 46 Federal Road are the subject of a notice of intent to sue by Conservation Law Foundation. Read CLF’s letter here.

Excerpt from CLF’s letter:

The Wankinko Bogs Site is within an approximately 538-acre parcel identified by the Town of

Carver Assessor as Map 131, Lot 2-4. The wetlands at the Site included a perennial stream that connected to the Wankinco River. The Wankinco River flows through Tihonet Pond and into the Wareham River. These waters constitute waters of the United States. A.D. Makepeace engaged in commercial sand and gravel mining at the Wankinko Bogs Site since 2011. In doing so, it has strip-mined or plans to strip-mine approximately 60 acres of wetlands. Between June 2012 and May 2015, A.D. Makepeace filled the perennial stream, permanently eliminating it. The discharged dredged or fill material remains in place. A.D. Makepeace also entirely filled portions of the wetlands in order to build trucking roads to facilitate its mining operations.

Upon information and belief, A.D. Makepeace did not obtain an individual permit from USACE to discharge dredged or fill materials into waters of the United States at the Wankinko Bogs Site, nor did it obtain coverage under a general permit.

MAY 2026: MassDEP judge says AD Makepeace violates state Wetlands Protection Act by mining without a valid permit;  mischaracterizes sand and gravel as “agriculture”

On May 12, 2026, a MassDEP Presiding Officer found ADM Cranberry conducted sand mining in a wetland buffer zone in violation of the Wetlands Protection Act while an appeal was pending. The judge also found AD Makepeace’s project was not “agriculture” for purposes of the wetlands law, but commercial and agricultural. This sets a major precedent for all the region’s sand mines that claim their sand mining is “agriculture.” The judge found Makepeace must comply with the state stormwater rules. Read the Decision here:

MassDEP Decision on AD Makepeace Sand Mine

  • Decision was in response to CLWC appeal of Town of Carver wetlands permit to allow AD Makepeace mining expansion

  • In May 2024 the Earth Removal Committee gave AD Makepeace its 13th sand mining for “cranberry agriculture” since 2003

  • Earth Removal Committee admits bogs not built in 20 years, issues permit anyway 

  • Residents suffer from noise, dust, excessive truck traffic, threats to drinking water wells

Above: April, 2025. AD Makepeace Co. sand mining operation at 46 Federal Road, Carver, MA. The mine started in 2011 and has continued expanding since. As of 2025 it covers about 60 acres. The company claims it is building cranberry bogs. This claim is used to evade local land use laws. See the drone footage here.

May, 2024: Town of Carver issues 13th sand mining permit to AD Makepeace Co.

In March, 2024, the Town of Carver Earth Removal Committee (ERC) granted AD Makepeace Co. the 5th sand mining permit for 46 Federal Road. The mine has been operating since 2011. Today the mine covers about 60 acres. Makepeace claims mining 60 acres is necessary to build 23 acres of bogs. At this location, Makepeace has mined sand worth at least  $60 million in sand according to recent price information.  The cranberry bogs are not built and it has not harvested one cranberry in 14 years of mining.

The ERC issued the “earth removal” permits under the claim that the mining is “necessary” to level the land for a cranberry bog and “incidental” to using the land for agriculture. It is not. Makepeace uses the sand and gravel to supply is its commercial aggregate business Read Custom Soils located on the same site.

The ground-breaking investigative report Sand Wars in Cranberry Country explains how AD Makepeace and other cranberry companies evade the laws to get sand mining permits.

For the 2024  Earth Removal Bylaw permit application Makepeace recycled old plans from 2011 called “Cranberry Bog Development and Earth Removal Plan.”

This site is one of seven Makepeace mining sites in the south Carver area.

Mining harms Environmental Justice neighborhood, environment

Local residents challenged the May 2024 earth removal permit for 46 Federal Road in court. They exercised their rights under the law to protect their health, homes and their environment including their drinking water.  See lawsuit here. 

A court dismissed the case on “standing” grounds saying the residents are not harmed. Those living in Cranberry Village, a mobile home park, know better. The mining is happening over the Carver aquifer protective district.  The mining threatens drinking water according to world renown expert Scott Horsley. The mining exposes the Environmental Justice community to sand dust, excessive noise, and diesel emissions from incessant trucks.

Town ERC sided with Makepeace in getting the case dismiss — ignoring the rights of its own residents to be free from harm from sand mining.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png 0 0 Meg Sheehan https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Meg Sheehan2025-05-29 13:37:252026-07-19 17:42:47Carver: AD Makepeace expands mine at 46 Federal Road

Plymouth: Hedge’s Pond Road Sand Mining: Lawsuit against Town, Foundation, Standish

April 19, 2025

On April 17, 2025, a group of 20 “persons” filed a lawsuit in Plymouth Superior Court against the Town of Plymouth, the Plymouth Foundation and Standish Investments LLC (EJ Pontiff). The lawsuit claims  the Select Board and the Plymouth Foundation unlawfully transferred the Cedarville Conservation Area without following Article 97 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution and other laws.

The lawsuit is under the State’s Citizen Suit Law, General Laws Chapter 214, Section 7A. The law gives a group of “at least ten persons” to sue to stop “actual or probable” damage to the environment when the activities violate an environmental law. A corporation, such as CLWC, is considered a “person” under the Citizen Suit Law. CLWC is a member of the “More Than Ten Residents” group.

Goals

The lawsuit asks the Superior Court to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to halt all activities and declare the sales null and void. It seeks an order requiring the Town to put 135 acres, as promised and as required, into conservation.  It also asks for restoration of the Site. 

History of the land

The land is the ancestral homelands of the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe.

Below: Cedarville Conservation Area, 4/7/2025 after strip mining starts.

  1. 1977:  Town obtains the property  (three separate parcels Lots 22B, 23, and 24 on Assessor’s Map 55) by tax taking. The purpose was to build a landfill.  This was never built.
  2. 1993: Town Meeting votes to conserve the land. At the April 3, 1993 Town Meeting voters voted  to change the purpose of the land from “municipal purposes” to “open space/conservation purposes.” Article 34 passed unanimously. The vote directed Town staff and officials to hold the land under the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission. This dedicated the land to open space and conservation.
  3. 1993 to 2025: Town designates “Cedarville Conservation Area” and public use. 
  4. 1996: Town Open Space Committee, Planning Board include Conservation Area in their plans.  The 1996 plan described the area as dedicated for conservation purposes. Plans in 2003, 2010, and 2017 continued to list the Cedarville Conservation Area as open space managed by the Conservation Commission.
  5. 2018 Town Meeting vote  on Articles 26 and 27 to transfer portions of the land from the Conservation Commission to the Board of Selectmen for general municipal purposes. Article 27 aimed to transfer remaining portions back to the Conservation Commission for conservation purposes. Because the land was protected, the Town had to comply with Article 97.
  6. 2022: Select Board sells to Plymouth Foundation for $1.00. After the Town Meeting voted in 2018, the Town and Foundation were required to follow Article 97 and other laws. They did not. They did not put the required 135 acres into conservation.
  7. February 7, 2025: Plymouth Foundation sells to Standish Investment Group, LLC/Eric Pontiff for $3.4 million. The Town/Foundation also gave Pontiff a mortgage for about $350,000 to help pay him buy the land. Read more about the Foundation here.

 

Find out more

See the Citizen Suit Lawsuit here.

Court filings here on Superior Court website.

Zoning Board of Appeals April 17, 2025 Decision here

March 24, 2025 Citizen Suit Law Notice Letter here.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-19-at-2.46.59 PM.png 1630 1308 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2025-04-19 15:08:102025-12-29 16:21:34Plymouth: Hedge’s Pond Road Sand Mining: Lawsuit against Town, Foundation, Standish

Plymouth: The Plymouth Foundation: A shadow government of land developers?

September 28, 2024

Plymouth Foundation is a registered  IRS 501(c)(3) charity, acts as shadow Town government according to research

Foundation listed on Town  website, taxpayers fund  staff salaries according to IRS filings

Foundation stacked with developers, 3 town employees, makes land deals with the Town

Update:  Attorney General’s Ruling Oct. 15 2025 says Foundation does not have to follow the Open Meeting Law, allows Foundation to continue to meet in secret

Attorney General Rules Foundation Exempt from Open Meeting Law: October 15, 2025

All the more reason for Town Meeting to vote YES on Article 26!

On October 15, 2025, the Attorney General ruled the Foundation is not covered by the Open Meeting Law because it is a private, not public, entity. This allows the Foundation to continue to meet in secret to talk about things like selling off Town land and helping developers with their projects. Read the Attorney General’s Ruling Oct. 15 2025 ruling here

The Attorney General ruling was in response to a September 25, 2024 Open Meeting Law complaint filed by CLWC here: Open Meeting Law Compliant Sept. 25, 2024. CLWC argued the Foundation should have to follow the Open Meeting Law because paid and unpaid town “employees” run the Foundation, the Town funds the Executive Director’s salary, and the Foundation uses Town resources to promote its mission of economic development.

While it might be technically “legal” for the Foundation to operate behind closed doors to promote “economic development” is this open and transparent government?

The Town Manager, the Town Planner and the Foundation’s Executive Director are being paid by the Town when they are meeting behind closed doors and conducting business for the Foundation. Should the public have the right to know what they are talking about?

Is the preferential treatment given to “economic development” by the Town and Foundation fair to other interests? Should the Town provide equal access and funding to other groups interested in the future development of the Town such as housing or sustainable development advocates? Why special treatment for business people promoting economic development?

The Attorney General’s Ruling turns on the legal question of whether the Foundation is a “public body” under the Open Meeting Law. The Attorney General ruled it is not a public body so does not have to comply with the Open Meeting Law.

Read more:

Report: Shining the Light on the Plymouth Foundation

Letter to the Editor: The Secretive Foundation is a shadow government of Plymouth Town Hall, 2024

Background

Who is the secretive “Plymouth Foundation”? The Foundation recently rebranded itself – it was founded in 2001 as the “Plymouth Regional Economic Development Foundation”. Here is its www.plymouth-ma.biz 

Is the Foundation a shadow government working hand in hand to siphon Town owned land into the hands of developers for private profit?

The Foundation claims “Our work preserves the character of our community and enriches quality of life in Greater Plymouth, Massachusetts.”

But the Foundation is involved in sand and gravel mining deals. Is this preserving our community?

In 2005, the Town sold 23 acres of public land to the Foundation which then conducted a sand and gravel mining operation.  Read about the Foundation’s sand mining at 103 Hedge’s Pond Road (Cantor Court) on SandWars.org  and on this  blog.

In 2022, the Plymouth Select Board sold more Town land to the Foundation —  33 acres for $1.00. The land is part of the Cedarville Conservation Area. The Town Planning and Development Department told Town Meeting that 134 acres would be put into conservation in exchange for the 33 acre sale. The 134 acres was not in put in conservation when the sold the Conservation Area to Standish Investment Group whose principal is E.J. Pontiff. Pontiff is involved in sand mining throughout the region. Read the blog: “Just say NO to New Sand Mine in Cedarville Conservation Area.”

Foundation registered IRS 501c3 charity

The Foundation is an IRS 501(c)(3) charity. This allows the Foundation to be exempt from paying  taxes on money it makes. Should the Foundation be claiming  “tax exempt” status when it is doing sand mining and selling Town land to developers? 

The Foundation’s tax returns from 2004 to 2023 here.   The tax returns show the Foundation generated income from sand and gravel mining.  Was the income generated by mining on Hedges Pond Road at the Cantor Court site where the ZBA gave the Foundation two sand and gravel mining permits?

Below: Example of Foundation’s IRS 990 tax return showing income from “sand and gravel sales” in 2008 and 2009.

On its 2022  IRS 990 tax returns the Foundation listed a website called  “econdevtownhall.plymouth.ma”. This website is supposed to be the place where the public can find the Foundation’s records and reports. The website is defunct.  Where are the records?

  A shadow government?

The Foundation has all the features of a “government body”  — but operates in the shadows behind closed doors in meetings with the developers on the board and the three town officials — making sand mining deals and selling land. The Foundation’s website mimics the Town website: “plymouth-ma.biz” much like the official Town website  “plymouth-ma.gov“.

The Town website features the Foundation prominently with a “Quick Link” and then identifies the Foundation’s Executive Director as “staff” of the Planning & Development Department. The Town website shows this below.

Then, the Town Planning and Development website lists “Economic Development & Tourism“:

Then the Town’s Economic Development & Tourism page lists Plymouth Foundation executive director Stephen Cole in the “Staff Directory”. As shown below, the Town website leads the public to believe the Executive Director of the Plymouth Foundation has an office at Plymouth Town Hall, 26 Court Street.

Three Town officials have permanent spots on the board of directors of the Foundation under the Foundation Bylaws. Two of them are paid town employees: the Town Manager and the Town Director of Planning and Economic Development. Are these town employees working for the Foundation as part of their town jobs, with their salaries paid by taxpayers?  Is this a conflict of interest? The third board position under the Foundation bylaws reserved for Town officials is the Chair of the Select Board.

See the Foundation’s list of most recent list of officer and directors of the Foundation below:

Source: Secretary of State, Corporations Division, Massachusetts

 

The directors include developers Rick Vayo, William Hallisey, and Dee Wallace Spencer, who is related to Scott Spencer of the sand and gravel mining project on Route 3 in Plymouth, as well as developer Tom Wallace.

Town taxpayers fund Foundation’s staff salary

The Foundation’s tax returns say that it provides “services” to the Town of Plymouth. For example, the Foundation’s 2022 IRS 990 tax returns state under Relationship of Activities to the Accomplishment of Exempt Purposes in Part XV-8, Line 11a:

“Economic development provide economic development services to the Town of Plymouth and such related services to other charitable organizations. Create and implement an industrial park within the Town of Plymouth To provide study of land and development….” 

Below: Plymouth Foundation 2022 IRS 990 tax return describing “economic development services to the Town of Plymouth.” This appears to be describing the executive director that the Town pays for.

Source: ProPublica

 

Below: Plymouth Foundation 2014 IRS 990 tax return stating it is “currently fee for service with the Town of Plymouth, providing Economic Development Director for the Town of Plymouth”. This also identifies sand and gravel sales in 2010 for $308,333.00 and in 2011 $261,444.00.

The Town is not a “charitable organization.” There are questions about whether a private 501(c)(3) can pay the salary of what is essentially a Town employee who appears on the Planning & Development directory as “Staff.”

On September 23, 2024, CLWC submitted a request to the Town Manager under the state Public Records Law for all records showing Town payments to the Foundation since 2001, including salary for the Foundation executive director. See the request Public Records Request to Plymouth here.

Click here to see the 2014 Memorandum of Agreement between the Town of Plymouth and the Plymouth Foundation. MoU-ToPandPREDF

Click here to see the 2025 Memorandum of Agreement between the Town of Plymouth and the Plymouth Foundation. This MOU was increased by 21.8%, raising the annual taxpayer contribution to the Plymouth Foundation from $125,000 to $152,298.

Click here to se a spreadsheet containing all records of monetary compensation paid by the Town of Plymouth to the Plymouth Foundation since 2009. 

 Conflicts of interest?

The state’s Conflict of Interest law prevents government employees like the Town Manager, Development Director and Selectboard members from engaging in activities that conflict with their duties to the Town. Read more about the State Ethics Commission here.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Screenshot-2024-09-25-at-3.11.40 PM-768x704-1.png 704 768 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2024-09-28 16:25:322025-12-29 15:26:29Plymouth: The Plymouth Foundation: A shadow government of land developers?

Carver: SLT’s massive sand mine on Route 44 level’s regions highest hill in 6 years for sand and gravel, harms people and environment

July 25, 2023

See the Timeline below

State, local officials stand by, town issues more permits and approvals

Corrupt town Earth Removal Committee complicit, allows mining expansion

Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Conservation Commission, state agencies refuse to enforce the law and side with mining company

For over six years, SLT Construction Co. has caused environmental destruction and harmed the health and well-being of residents in the surrounding neighborhoods. SLT has leveled the highest hill in Carver down to the street level. It has expanded illegally into Plympton. In collusion with the Carver Earth Removal Committee, it got a permit to expand on the abutting “Marob Trust” property. Marob’s owner previously conducted a massive mining operation on part of its property with an earth removal permit from Carver. Now SLT has taken the rest of the sand.

Read more about SLT in Sand Wars in Cranberry Country: An investigation into the money, politics and corruption behind sand mining and its silent environmental crisis in Southeastern Massachusetts.

Under investigation for fraud according to sources

SLT Construction and its contractor AGT Trucking (Alan Germain, recently elected Town Moderator in Carver) are under investigation by the Massachusetts Office of the Inspector General. The office investigates fraud and waste of public resources.

Residents, environment suffer

SLT’s non-stop commercial mining operation makes the lives of people living nearby intolerable. Dust, noise, vibration, constant truck traffic, logging, and operation of sand and gravel processing equipment cause ear-splitting, concussion noise. Truck traffic is non-stop. Excavation, loading tractor trailers, rock crushing, and sorting cause noise and vibrations that make their homes shake. Carcinogenic silica dust blows from the site onto homes, exposing residents to a health hazard. This is a residential neighborhood

January 2022, High Street, Carver. Dust from SLT mining.

Drinking water threatened

Read the 2022 hydrologist report here:

SLT-Mining-Site-Horsley-Report-Carver-020322Download

Drone photos show Rickets Pond is drying up. In over 40 years, this has never happened according to local residents.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f94tKuZ7QRw
Strip mining and earth removal occurring on Spring Street near Rickett’s Pond in Carver, MA. SLT is mining under the ruse of creating “Rickets Pond Business Park.”

 


SLT leveled the highest hill in Carver, clear-cutting forests and altering drainage patterns, stormwater flow and groundwater infiltration rates. The site is in the Plymouth Carver Sole Source Aquifer. Forests, vegetation and sand and gravel filter and protect our water. SLT has permanently removed the filtration and protection of the drinking water supply for 200,000 people – present and future generations.

Here’s your revised text with grammar and spelling corrections, while maintaining the bold text and embedded links:

Timeline


2015

The Town of Carver rezones the area as the “Spring Street Innovation District” on the recommendation of the Town Planner and Town Manager, who promise the land will be used for an “innovative business park.”

2018

SLT makes a deal to buy the land from MassDOT. SLT and MassDOT start industrial clearing, logging, and a commercial sand and gravel mining operation that is continuing as of 2024. The Carver Earth Removal Committee grants earth removal permits even though the application is incomplete. The permits do not have mandatory conditions. The public hearing in 2021 was a “sham,” according to Superior Court Judge Sullivan. The files on the 2021 sham permit are here. The state “MEPA” office signs off on the project and does not conduct even minimal due diligence to require SLT and MassDOT to conduct a proper environmental impact study. The MEPA Certificate is a sham. See that here.

This is a commercial mining operation, not an innovative business park. The Zoning Board of Appeals, Earth Removal Committee, Board of Selectmen, Conservation Commission, and Board of Health have all allowed commercial sand and gravel mining and processing—a quarry—to operate with impunity.

2021

Save the Pine Barrens seeks enforcement of the Bylaw to stop violations. The Building Inspector refuses. The appeal is made to the ZBA. Following a sham hearing before the Carver ZBA, the denial is appealed to court. In late 2023, the residents decided to dismiss the case and pursue other options.

January, 2022:

Residents file a lawsuit to protect themselves, families, and the environment against SLT’s mining expansion

 

Court Hearing: September 6, 2024: Appeals Court, Boston

Where: John Adams Courthouse, Allan M. Hale (Rm Four)
Pemberton Square, Boston, MA 02108

Time: 10:30 a.m.
Name of the case: Cynthia Beard and others v. James Nauen, Carver Earth Removal Committee and others.
Confirm time and find out more: https://www.ma-appellatecourts.org/docket/2023-P-1484
Open to the public.
Questions: If you have any questions please email AppealsCtClerk@jud.state.ma.us.

Find the legal briefs with the arguments to the court here in Google Drive. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VNzs_sNKIiIWeLcxUCNwjnnJLNba0uYi?usp=sharing

 

The Lawsuit:

The lawsuit challenges the second earth removal (sand and gravel mining) permit the Carver ERC granted to SLT for the 0 Spring Street, Carver mine. The ERC granted the permit in November 2021 for mining on about 5 additional acres known as the “Marob Lot.” The name of the lawsuit is Cynthia Beard and others vs. James Nauen as a member of the Carver Earth Removal Committee and others. It is Superior Court Case 2283 CV 00032 and Appeals Court case 2023-P-1484.

In January 2022, a group of eleven Carver residents living next to the sand mine sued SLT and the Carver Earth Removal Committee in Superior Court to try to stop the mining on the Marob Lot and nullify the 2021 permit. Since then, the Carver Earth Removal Committee (ERC) and SLT have been fighting the residents every step of the way, forcing them to spend limited resources to pursue the case in court. The residents are simply seeking justice, clean air, and the protection of Rickets Pond, their homes, and drinking water. Read more below about the legal steps leading up to the September 6, 2024, hearing in the Appeals Court.

Since January 2022, SLT and the Earth Removal Committee have taken every legal step possible to fight the residents trying to protect the environment and their homes. While fighting the residents, SLT immediately started mining the Marob Lot under the new permit, expanding the existing 20-acre open pit mine by another 5 acres.

The ERC and SLT stalled the lawsuit so they could keep mining. As of September 2024, SLT and the ERC are arguing the lawsuit is moot because the mining on the Marob Lot is done. The residents say it is not because the ERC never required SLT to take the steps required by the Bylaw to protect the environment and residents, and let them mine anyway.

The Sham 2021 Earth Removal Permit

The November 2021 ERC agenda for the public hearing where the ERC granted the permit covered up the name of SLT and hid the permit application under the wrong location. This new permit was issued under the name of the abutting landowner Mary McGrath/Marob Trust. According to statements by Peter Opachinski at the Earth Removal Public Hearing, SLT made a deal with McGrath to excavate sand and gravel to “blend the two lots together.”

Below: May, 2024. This is the Marob Lot after SLT’s mining under the 2021 Earth Removal Permit. SLT told residents they would be planting the site with “wildflowers” after the mining.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dED2Y3Pi2zo
Above: SLT mining site, 0 Spring Street, May 2024.

Court happenings

July 2022:

At a court hearing on July 20, 2022, Superior Court Judge Sullivan says the so-called public hearing the ERC held on the SLT application for an earth removal permit was a “SHAM.”

September 22, 2022:

Superior Court Judge Sullivan denied SLT’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint appealing the November 2021 earth removal permit. Read the Decision here. The Judge’s written decision says:

“The Earth Removal Bylaw is ‘clearly intended to protect citizens of Carver, such as the plaintiffs, from detrimental effects of earth removal… Plaintiffs have raised concerns regarding their safety and general welfare. The concerns raised are not speculative, as the plaintiffs allege that they have been experiencing the detrimental effects of the earth removal operations since it began, which the plaintiffs have established by way of affidavits.'”

In February 2022

The Earth Removal Committee and SLT opposed the residents’ lawsuit again, forcing them to go back to court to defend their right to fight for a clean environment and the protection of their homes and families. The Earth Removal Committee and SLT moved to dismiss the residents’ lawsuit for lack of legal standing, saying they are not “harmed.” This time, the court judge agreed with them. This is the subject of the legal appeal on September 6, 2024.

2022: Hydrologist says SLT threatens drinking water, Conservation Commission violated law.

February 3, 2022:

An expert hydrologist report concludes SLT’s mining operation threatens public and private drinking water wells and adjacent wetland resources, and the Carver Conservation Commission is allowing violations to happen.

April 2022:

SLT files for site plan review and special permits with the Carver Planning Board for office and warehouse buildings—not the self-storage units identified in the MEPA Certificate.

Drone video shows SLT digging up stumps at the Spring Street site. In early 2022, a huge pile of stumps that had been removed during the excavation on the site was clearly obvious to everyone driving on Route 44. Suddenly, they were gone. On April 5, 2022, it looks like they were dug up. This video also shows SLT excavated into the groundwater in three places. The “stormwater basin” near Spring Street is full of silt.

May 24, 2022:

Carver Planning Board describes in detail all the violations they saw on their site visit at SLT—and they still grant a 2-year extension of the subdivision approval. Peter Opachinski of SLT explains on video how they “plan” to start excavation in Plympton. Maps show SLT is already mining in Plympton.

SLT has sold three lots in the subdivision. The new owners want permits from the Planning Board and Conservation Commission. The entire 27-acre subdivision site violates the zoning law because earth removal is prohibited in this zoning district.

June 27, 2022:

Carver Planning Board hearing on 3 new lots in SLT subdivision. Should they get approved even though there are many legal questions about the mining operation and an expert says the project threatens drinking water and wetlands?

July 19, 2022:

Carver Zoning Board of Appeals: final day of public hearing on Save the Pine Barrens’ request for enforcement of the Zoning Bylaw. The Zoning Bylaw makes it illegal to mine in the SSID zoning district where SLT’s mine is being conducted. On July 19, 2022, the ZBA refused to do its job, saying it lacked “subject matter jurisdiction” over zoning violations. The ZBA’s contorted legal argument is contrary to established law and wrong. STPB appealed the erroneous decision. The case was eventually dismissed by STPB in order to pursue other options.

September 2022:

Carver Planning Board denies site plan review and special permit for Lot 3 on SLT’s plans. SLT sues the Planning Board. SLT changes the plans, and the Planning Board issues the permit.

Town of Plympton issues a cease and desist to SLT Construction to stop unpermitted earth removal on the Plympton portion of the site.

Carver Conservation Commission issues a wetlands permit for Lot 3 to put structures near Rickets Pond. Save the Pine Barrens and 10 residents appeal the Conservation Commission’s permit to MassDEP. The appeal goes to a hearing in June 2024. An expert says the whole subdivision is in violation of the Clean Water Act and the state Wetlands Law. Read the expert testimony here >>>

April 5, 2022:

Drone video shows SLT digging up stumps at the Spring Street site. In early 2022, a huge pile of stumps that had been removed during the excavation on the site were clearly obvious to everyone driving on Route 44. Suddenly they were gone. On April 5, 2022 it looks like they were dug up. This video also shows SLT excavated into the ground water in three places. The “stormwater basin” near Spring Street is full of silt.

May 24, 2022:

Carver Planning Board describes in detail all the violations they saw on their site visit at SLT — and they still grant a 2 year extension of the subdivision approval. Peter Opachinski of SLT explains on video how they “plan” to

2023

SLT applies to the Town of Plympton for an earth removal permit. Following a public hearing, the Town Selectboard says it will not proceed unless SLT supplies an environmental report to make sure the operation won’t harm drinking water. SLT never follows up.

SLT then applies to MassDEP for an asphalt, brick and concrete “recycling facility” on the Plympton portion of the land.

July 21, 2023:

MassDEP asks SLT for more information before it acts on the permit. See MassDEP’s letter here. SLT never follows up with the environmental study.

Plympton.SLT-Construction.DEP-Letter.072123-1Download

November 14, 2023: SLT Construction appeals to try to get Plympton to issue a permit for a “materials processing facility.” See the appeal below. SLT says it has to mine 102,000 cubic yards to level the site for the facility. The Zoning Board of Appeals denies the permit.

Plympton-SLT-zoning-appealDownload
Complaint-STPB-v-ZBA-re-SLT-zoning-violationsDownload

2024

The public continues the fight to hold the Town of Carver and SLT accountable for the destruction and harm caused by the 6-year-long ongoing sand and gravel mine.

July 8, 2024:

CLWC sends a demand letter to the Town of Plympton. We ask Plympton to stop SLT’s illegal mining. Read more here. As of September 2024, the Town has not responded. The illegal mining continues. Watch the latest drone video here.

September 6, 2024:

The lawsuit against SLT and the Carver Earth Removal Committee has a court hearing. This case is about the earth removal permit the ERC granted, allowing SLT to expand its mining operations to the east of Rickets Pond. The land is owned by Marob Trust and Mary McGrath. The hearing is open to the public and will be held in the Appeals Court in Boston. Read more in the 2021 timeline above.

Read the Judges Decision here: Judge-Sullivan-Decision-2022.08.12MotionToDismissDeniedBeard-v-SLTDownload

2025

July 11.

CLWC lawyers also helped Carver residents challenge a decision by MassDEP Commissioner Bonnie Heiple that allowed SLT and Bridgestone to pollute groundwater at the SLT sand mining site in Carver.

Read the Complaint here:

Complaint Thomas Pollitt and others v. MassDEP and others Complaint

2023

May 12.

In the next step in the process of appealing the ERC’s 2021 permit to Marob Trust/SLT to expand on the north side of Rickets Pond, Plaintiffs file the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Read their Memorandum and Motion to the Court here.

 

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png 0 0 Katherine Harrelson https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Katherine Harrelson2023-07-25 16:14:002025-12-30 16:55:46Carver: SLT’s massive sand mine on Route 44 level’s regions highest hill in 6 years for sand and gravel, harms people and environment

Wareham: 0 Route 25 Proposed Solar Site Threatens Pine Barrens Forest, Drinking Water and Way of Life

January 30, 2023

 

  • Project threatens 21 acres of rare Pine Barrens forests, and drinking water of downgradient residents
  • Concerned residents’ information submitted to Planning Board asks the Board to deny the Site Plan Review and Special Permit Application – see the Wareham Planning Board file here
  • Fletcher mining operation under the ruse of cranberry agriculture, now solar with Wareham PV LLC exposed
  • Planning Board denies the project due to non-conformance with bylaw

Above: Image courtesy of Google Earth, 2022 The proposed site includes the strip mined area along the cranberry bog on the west side. The trees along the mining site will be cleared.

Updates

December, 2023: The Planning Board denies the project, due to non-conformances with the local solar by-law. The bylaw requires a 75-foot set-back for new solar projects. After the applicant re-submitted the project in April 2023 without a battery energy storage system, they were not willing to re-design the project further to comply with the new bylaw. Accordingly, the project was denied.

Background

An out of state limited liability company, Wareham PV I LLC is proposing to install a 3.5 megawatt solar array just north of Route 25, near Harlow Brook in central Wareham. The project will chop down about 21 acres of forest for the proposed large ground mounted project.

According to the consultant, the southern portion of the site consists of a pine canopy with a dense shrub understory, aka the rare Pine Barrens ecosystem of southeastern Massachusetts. The Pine Barrens are a unique ecoregion found only in Southeastern Massachusetts, Long Island, and New Jersey; the Massachusetts forests support over 200 state and federally listed species. Cutting down another 21 acres of this rare wilderness threatens the viability of the entire ecoregion.

Image of the site courtesy of VHB

According to the consultant, the site soils consist of glacial outwash deposits which consist of loamy sands, and fine sands, and the depth to groundwater 44 to 50 inches at the seasonal high water table in March – April. Site groundwater is recharged by precipitation – rainwater and snowmelt. Therefore, according to the consultant’s own report, this site sits atop the Plymouth-Carver Sole Source aquifer, the only source of drinking water for five towns in southeastern Massachusetts.

Image of the site courtesy of VHB

Wareham has lost over 300 acres of forest to solar development in the last five years. No comprehensive hydraulic study has been conducted for the Town of Wareham on how the removal of up to 300 acres of forest in the Town will affect the Town’s drinking water supply. We cannot have any more threats to the drinking water of Wareham residents and beyond. Residents, particularly downgradient residents who get their drinking water from private wells, are speaking out about how these proposed solar projects are threatening their water supply. 

A citizens’ activist group submitted a Citizens’ Memorandum to the Wareham Planning Board, calling for the Board to oppose the site:

Citizens-MemorandumDownload

This solar site, in addition to three other proposed solar sites currently before the Wareham Planning Board (91 & 101 Fearing Hill Road, 27 Charge Pond Road and 150 Tihonet Road), together threaten 144 acres of rare Pine Barrens forest in Wareham. Forests are a critical part of of our climate solution, and the Pine Barrens give Wareham its unique character. Why should Wareham stand for this?

At the December 12, 2022 public hearing of the Planning Board, the solar developer was faced with questions from the Planning Board. The Board wants more information about the costs of decommissioning of the project, and the location of future disposal of the solar panels. They rejected the application and requested that the decommissioning plans be updated to reflect more realistic costs. During the hearing, expert hydrogeologist Scott Horsley presented the board with his findings of the site, which include the potential for a heat island effect from the solar panels and loss of forest cover, reduction in evapotranspiration, and potential for groundwater mounding. He called for an independent study of the hydrology of the site before the plans were voted on. His testimony was covered by the Wareham Week. The hearing was continued.

At the continued Planning Board public hearing January 9, 2023, the solar developer again faced questions. The Planning Board continued the hearing again deciding there were too many unanswered questions about the project. The Board was not satisfied with the decommissioning proposal – they wanted the applicant to up the bond from $800K to $2.2M. They also stated that construction cannot begin until after the applicant receives an interconnection agreement – which the applicant currently does not have. The Chair also expressed concerns with potential groundwater contamination – from both the panels themselves and the battery storage unit – and stated that monitoring wells would be a requirement for the project.

During the course of the public meeting, it was revealed that the BESS – battery energy storage system – would transfer energy two ways, both transmitting energy from the panels to the grid and receiving energy from the grid. This was a new development, which the Board was not yet aware of. One of the members stated that Wareham did not have the laws in place yet to regulate such a system. The Board also stated that the BESS would be held to the same safety requirements as the proposed BESS at Fearing Hill.

The public hearing was continued on February 13, 2023, at which time the applicant faced more questions from the Board. One of the Board’s primary concerns was the two-way energy transfer system of the BESS. The Board saw a great potential for the BESS to become a profitable energy storage system of its own. According to Mike King, Chair of the Wareham Planning Board, he saw no reason why the owner of the BESS would not “buy low, sell high,” as in, take energy off the grid when it was abundant, and place it back on the grid when it was needed. The applicant could not argue, because that is essentially the goal of grid stabilization. However, the Board was very wary about approving such a system, not knowing the true function and scope of the BESS in the future. BESS, along with solar arrays, are an ever-evolving technology.

The safety of BESS’s also came up during the meeting, at which time it was revealed that Wareham Fire Department’s standard response to a battery storage unit fire was to essentially let it burn. Pouring water on a chemical battery fire creates toxic gas, and therefore the safest thing to do was to let it burn out. However, the BESS will sit directly on top of our aquifer, and the site’s operation and maintenance plan does not have any requirements for thermal monitoring of the unit.

The Board was also very concerned about the applicant’s unwillingness to install monitoring wells around the property, saying that the residents and the Town’s water deserved to be protected. They cited Warren’s recently approved solar bylaw, which requires solar developers to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a Phase II ESA if necessary. A Phase II ESA would require pre-and post- solar development soil and groundwater sampling, to determine if the solar array had any negative impact on the soil or groundwater quality below it. The applicant’s lawyer pushed back against the suggestion, saying that the Massachusetts Attorney General had verbally admonished Warrens for such a strict bylaw, and that the applicant maintained there was no need for groundwater monitoring at the Wareham site. The overall attitude of the applicant’s lawyer seemed to suggest they were not willing to go above and beyond their proposal to add groundwater monitoring at the site, which did not sit well with the Board.

After eighteen months of public hearings, the Wareham Planning Board voted to reject the site plan and special permit application for this approximately 20-acre solar and battery project next to a cranberry bog. On April 27, 2023, the Board met and voted to rescind that vote and reopen the public hearing to obtain more information on impacts to drinking water and the safety of the battery storage system (BESS). The new site plan review, for a project without a BESS, is set to commence September 18, 2023.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/0-route-25.png 281 373 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2023-01-30 18:19:532025-12-29 16:39:55Wareham: 0 Route 25 Proposed Solar Site Threatens Pine Barrens Forest, Drinking Water and Way of Life

Plymouth: AD Makepeace mining operation under the ruse of cranberry agriculture exposed

December 6, 2022

AD Makepeace blatantly abuses the process for obtaining permits under the Mass Endangered Species Act

State officials look the other way, pretend Plymouth mining operations are “cranberry agriculture”

Hundreds of acres of Priority Habitat for rare and endangered Pine Barrens plants and animals being obliterated

Above: Location of AD Makepeace 217-acre strip mine. The company is trying to claim this is a “agriculture project” to build 136 acres of cranberry bogs and reservoirs, pumps and canals. Below: strip mine will destroy globally rare habitat designated for conservation by the state.

Priority Habitat being for rare and endangered species being destroyed by AD Makepeace strip mine, State DFG goes along

AD Makepeace 140 acre mining project in Priority Habitat 507 and adjacent to Priority Habitat 601 Source: MassMapper https://maps.massgis.digital.mass.gov/MassMapper/MassMapper.html

The state’s top environmental official, Secretary of Energy & Environmental Affairs, continues to cover up for AD Makepeace, pretending this is “agriculture.” The state ignores the hundreds of trucks a day hauling sand and gravel illegally mined to supply Makepeace’s Read Custom Soils aggregate processing and sales facility. As shown on the map below, Makepeace’s Read Custom Soils is abutting the 2014- acre Plymouth strip mine where the company is mining at least 7.2 million cubic yards according to its Town permit application.

AD Makepeace’s Read Custom Soils, less than 1/2 mile from the 140 acre Plymouth mining site

Makepeace brags it is strip mining its “enormous reserves” of sand and gravel in Plymouth and Carver:

From AD Makepeace Read Custom Soils: www.readcustomsoils.com

Within a one mile radius ADM Makepeace is strip mining at least 14 million cubic yards of sand and gravel according to permits in Carver and Wareham. More is being mined without permits under the pretense that the sand and gravel is being used to maintain and restore Makepeace’s 1,700 acres of bogs.

AD Makepeace has at least 4 large mining sites within about a 1 mile radius in Plymouth and Carver. Source: Mass Mapper. Yellow is Priority Habitat under Mass. Endangered Species Act.

AD Makepeace mining locations: south Plymouth & Carver’s Read Custom Soils

Some AD Makepeace mining and solar sites surrounding Read Custom Soils, Carver, Plymouth, Wareham MA. 2022.
List of sites corresponding to numbers in map above.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Protest-5-.jpeg 1512 2016 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2022-12-06 08:24:002025-12-30 16:18:01Plymouth: AD Makepeace mining operation under the ruse of cranberry agriculture exposed
Page 1 of 212

Archives by Month

Tags

AD Makepeace Aquifer Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens Battery battery bomb Biodiversity Carver Carver MA corruption Craig Weston Cranberry cranberry bog Cranberry Country Corruption Cranberry County Corruption Deforestation DOER drinking water Earth removal Endangered Species Extinction Federal Road Forests Groundwater Indigenous Sovereignty Jim Kane Makepeace Massachusetts mining Pine Barrens Plymouth Reckless Development Resources sand and gravel Sand mining Solar Solar gone wrong Sole Source Aquifer strip mine Strip Mining Wareham Water water quality Wetlands Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Violations

Community Land and Water Coalition

P.O. Box 1699, Plymouth, MA 02362
Email
Phone: 508-259-9154

Please consider making a donation to help strengthen our impact!

DONATE

You can sign our Sand Mining Petition to Governor Healy and town Selectboards here

Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
YouTube
Instagram
Tiktok
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Join Our Email List

    Copyright © Community Land & Water Coalition   |   Privacy Policy   |   Site By LW Creative
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Youtube
    • TikTok
    Scroll to top