Massachusetts Orders Full Environmental Review After Community Campaign Wins Major Victory
MEPA Requires Comprehensive Study of Proposed Development and Sand Mining Impacts on Ricketts Pond Site
PLYMOUTH, MA — The Community Land & Water Coalition (CLWC) today hailed a major environmental victory after the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) ordered a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Ricketts Pond Business Park expansion for a proposed 60-unit residential development in Carver and Plympton.
The June 29 decision rejects the developer’s request to bypass additional environmental review and instead requires a comprehensive analysis of groundwater protection, air quality, traffic, public health, climate impacts, and the cumulative effects of years of large-scale sand mining on the site.
“This decision confirms what residents, local officials, and environmental advocates have argued all along—that this project deserves a full and transparent environmental review,” said Meg Sheehan, coordinator of Community Land & Water Coalition. “The sand mining operation has destroyed every aspect of the environment that existed on the site — clear cutting Pine Barrens forests and hauling off the land itself in tractor trailer trucks for commercial sale since 2018. The public deserves answers before additional development moves forward.”
The decision follows years of advocacy by CLWC and local residents, including more than 1,600 people who participated in the MEPA process by submitting comments urging the state to require a full environmental review. The Town of Plympton Board of Health, Planning Board, and Open Space Committee also participated in urging a full environmental review.
Key Findings
A two step environment study is required under the state’s MEPA law: a draft study for public comment, and a final study. Both must cover ways to avoid or mitigate damage to the region’s sole-source drinking water aquifer; air quality from dust, and diesel emissions, traffic, groundwater withdrawals and stormwater runoff, climate resilience, cumulative impacts, environmental justice, and open space.
The Secretary also rejected the developer’s request to waive the Environmental Impact Report requirement ruling that it did not meet the requirements.
Pine duBois of Jones River Watershed Association said “ Rickett’s Pond is a neglected but important environmental resource for this area. Already water use from wells has drawn down the pond and vanquished the adjacent vernal pool. Eradication of trees and denuding hillsides adjacent to the new highway has altered the landscape and resources forever, with no consideration or forethought. We’re destroying the natural resources we all rely on for health and safety, and sacrificing opportunities for future generations to thrive, for what?”
CLWC will continue to work with the community to participate in the MEPA Environmental Impact Report process to ensure the issues identified by state agencies, local officials, and residents receive the comprehensive review required under Massachusetts environmental law.
Since 2018 CLWC and a wide grassroots network has fought to raise awareness about this sand mine. It is an approximately 40 acre site in Carver and Plympton on Route 44 going East at the Spring Street exit. Read more here
This photo below from December 5, 2021 shows the last remaining stand of trees on the hill in the center of the site.
July 8, 2024: Third Request of enforcement of Earth removal bylaws is sent to the Town of Plympton and their Board of Selectmen. The letter asks their to be an investigation into unauthorized earth removal at the site. Read the letter here.
June 24, 2024: New evidence alleges the mining at the site on Lot 3 is illegal and violates stormwater regulations. Read the memo here. A DEP hearing will be held on Sept. 4, at 100 Cambridge Street Suite 900, Boston, MA 02114.
May 15, 2024: CLWC sent a second demand letter to the Town of Plympton demanding that it enforce the town’s bylaws against SLT Construction. Read the letter here. May 15 2024 SLT Letter Final
July 30, 2025: A group of 10 residents sent a notice of intent to sue letter to prevent and minimize damages to the environment. Read the letter here.
The letter asserts “The evidence that SLT is engaged in large-scale earth removal on the Plympton side of the Property is indisputable.” The letter contains updated drone surveillance photos and a demand to enforce the Bylaw.
If the Town does not enforce the Bylaw, the public can go to court to enforce it.
Go to CLWC’s You Tube Channel to see drone videos like this one from December 2021 showing massive deforestation in just one day: here
In 2022, CLWC tried to enforce the Carver zoning laws against SLT. The Town refused to enforce the law and sided with SLT.
Read more about the public’s effort to enforce the Carver Earth Removal Bylaw against the illegal expansion of the mining operation onto the adjacent “Marob” property here.
Below: May 13, 2024. 0 Spring St.
The OADR from 2018 and 2022 don’t account for the impact on Rickett’s Pond and its Buffering Vegetative Wetlands (BVW) caused by sand and gravel deposits from the RPBP mining site, including Lot 3. These materials have been entering Rickett’s Pond since at least 2019. Since February 2018, the Project Site has undergone complete deforestation, alteration, and excavation to remove sand and gravel. These activities have significantly affected areas protected under environmental regulations. They could potentially change groundwater levels, which might affect the hydrology of nearby wetlands. Moreover, the changes in surface runoff patterns have redirected water flow from one sub-watershed to another, directly impacting the plant life and wildlife habitats in the surrounding areas. View drone footage of the site here.
Leading hydrologist Scott Horsley says SLT’s dense housing proposal on the sand mine in Plympton threatens Town’s drinking water. Read his comments to the Town here
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/sand-mining_2.jpg9461594Meg Sheehanhttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngMeg Sheehan2026-07-02 12:38:012026-07-02 12:53:16Carver-Plympton: Rickets Pond Sand Mining Site
A.D. Makepeace is one of the largest private landowners in Massachusetts, with extensive
holdings primarily in Plymouth, Carver, and Wareham, and Rochester. It owns about 12,000 acres. Historically, the company’s business was cranberry agriculture. Since the 1990s, Makepeace has expanded and operates across multiple industries, including:
Cranberry Production
Engineered Soil Products– Read Custom Soils (RCS)
Sand and Gravel Extraction
Large-scale Solar Development
Residential Development– Redbrook project in Plymouth (about 1,200 homes) and
Rosebrook business park in Wareham
Motto: “Inspired by Nature”
This combination of land ownership and vertically integrated operations positions Makepeace to
control the full lifecycle of land use—from clearing to extraction to redevelopment.
A.D. Makepeace’s operations represent a significant transformation of Southeastern Massachusetts landscapes.
The rapid land use changes — from agriculture and forestry to industrial scale sand and gravel extraction, vast solar facilities and development raises significcant questions for the community:
How should cumulative impacts be evaluated?
Is the current use consistent with the intent of the Tihonet Mixed Use Development (TMUD) plan from 2005 — a promise of smart growth, open space protection and village centers?
What level of oversight is appropriate for projects of this scale? Where is the oversight? Who is in charge?
These issues continue to be debated in courts, town boards, and communities across the region.
Cranberries: The Historical Core — No Longer the Profit Driver
A.D. Makepeace is still:
the largest cranberry grower in the world
farming about 1,750 acres of bogs across southeastern Massachusetts according to its
website
However, the economics of cranberry farming have changed dramatically in the last 30 years:
The Massachusetts Department of Agriculture has described cranberry farming as a
“beleaguered industry”
Prices have declined significantly in recent years while costs have risen
Industry-wide, cranberry growing is often:
low-margin or break-even
dependent on subsidies and market volatility
every fall, excess production and low prices results in dumping a percent of the harvest
Even regional officials acknowledge cranberry growing “isn’t a booming industry.”
The Shift: From Farming to Resource Extraction
Because cranberry farming alone is no longer highly profitable:
Makepeace has shifted toward resource extraction of timber, soils and sand off its land, and commercial and residential development:
Tens of millions of cubic yards of sand have been removed across hundreds of acres of its lands and
Sand mining continues today
The company now generates significant revenue from sand sales through its
subsidiary, Read Custom Soils
Extraction of timber and topsoils is used to blend with the sand for commercial sale
Makepeace now derives at least 70% of its revenue from non-cranberry activities and all its profits, according to public sources
The Integrated Revenue Model
Step 1: Cranberry Agriculture (Entry Point)
Land is classified as:
Agricultural
This classification can:
Enable earth removal permits — commerical sand mining is often permitted as “bog construction”
or “reservoir creation” or claimed to be for sanding the bogs
Reduce regulatory scrutiny under the Wetlands Protection Act, municipal wetland bylaws, the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act, and historic preservation laws
Reduce real estate taxes: agricultural or forestry land has a lower tax rate allowing Makepeace to pay minimal real estate taxes
Step 2: Sand Mining (Primary Profit Engine)
Sand removal has surged in the last 10 years.
Multiple operations centered in south Carver and Wareham generate 100s hundreds of truckloads per day with multi-year excavation permits
Rising sand prices and demand make extraction far more profitable than farming
Dozens of permits in the last 30 years, hundreds of acres
Looking ahead:
In September 2024, ADM Cranberry filed a Carver Earth Removal Application for Map 131 Lots 1-2 and 1-3, west of Federal Road, seeking removal of 1,776,200 cubic yards over 3 years plus 1 year renewal. The application is on hold but likely will be reactivated. Read more on the ERC Site.
In April 2026, ADM Cranberry filed new plans for continued expansion of the 85 acre “bog construction” and sand mining project at 59 Federal Road in Carver
The “Farm of the Future” earth removal permit at Frogfoot in Plymouth is on hold, only about 25% complete but certainly Makepeace has plans to generate revenue here. Read more here:
Makepeace does not just sell raw sand.
Through its subsidiary Read Custom Soils (RCS):
Sand arrives from nearby deposits or quarry
Screening / sorting
separates sizes (fine, medium, coarse)
Stockpiling
large sand piles staged on site
Soil “blending and manufacturing: Sand, topsoils, and wood products from AD Makepeace’s land clearing are,
screened
blended
engineered
Products include:
golf course materials
construction aggregates
stormwater and structural soils
This converts raw sand and topsoils into higher-margin specialty products — Makepeace claims this is an “agricultural blending facility”
RCS acts as:
a regional distribution hub and trucking terminal to weigh and transship sand, aggregates and its soil products
fed by Makepeace land clearing/logging and mining sites around the region
Step 4: Trucking and Distribution
Hundreds of trucks move material daily from Makepeace’s lands and directly to customers or through Read
Sand and “soil products” shipped across New England
This represents a continuous cash flow from extracted materials
Step 5: Solar Development (Second Revenue Layer)
After trees and topsoil are removed and the land stripped to bare sand:
Land is flattened and cleared
Then leased for:
large-scale solar installations (~20-year leases)
Solar companies override local control: Makepeace has built at least 12 large ground mounted solar projects in the area already
In 2023, the Wareham Planning Board denied Makepeace and Borrego Solar extensions
for the 3 new projects, based on the public health, safety and welfare, including the
cumulative impact. Makepeace through the solar company sued the Town of Wareham to force them to issue the permits. Then, the Town and the solar company settled behind closed doors and permits were issued in 2025
The 3 new solar projects are:
27 Charge Pond Road — Case 7-20, decision dated October 20, 2020
150 Tihonet Road — Case 9-20, decision dated December 28, 2020
140 Tihonet Road — Case 8-20, decision dated March 8, 2021.
Official Wareham records also show that by 2025 the Town was still in litigation over some of
these projects. The joint Select Board / Planning Board executive-session agenda for October 8,
2025 lists litigation involving 27 CPR Solar1, LLC, New Leaf Energy, Inc., Wareham PV1,
LLC, and Wareham MA 3 LLC. A later Planning Board executive-session agenda on
December 10, 2025 lists PV1, LLC v. Town of Wareham Planning Board and MA 3 LLC, et
al v. Town of Wareham Planning Board.
Looking ahead:
Makepeace conducting aggressive land clearing and sand mining at 0 Maple Springs Road in Wareham: Proposing a solar project under the shell name “OMSR Wareham Solar 1, LLC .” There are active Conservation/ZBA solar + battery filings in 2025.
Makepeace seeking permits for a large solar project at 0 Wareham Road, Carver – will clear cut 27 acres of forest. Project is in project in Riverfront Area, wetland buffer zone, and that will clear-cut 27 acres of forest. Appeal process at MassDEP/
Wihonet Road, Plymouth, Frogfoot Brook and trails area: CLWC appeals
Makepeace plan to install solar project on about 40 acres of illegally filled
wetlands. The location is also called the Canning Bogs.
O Golden Pond Road: sand mining, wetlands filling without permits, Carver issues Cease and Desist
North Wareham Solar: Makepeace and its affiliate REDP seeking to clear-cut 50 acres for a large ground-mounted solar project along Tihonet Road, north of the 160 Tihonet Road solar project
This land use model with solar creates:
long-term, steady income
on land already monetized through logging and mining
does not generate power that helps local rate payers, but rather produces energy that is
sold throughout New England while local communities bear the burden of deforestation
and risks to drinking water supply
Step 6: Final Development — Land Sales:, Redbrook and Beyond
After logging, sand mining extraction and sales, comes solar development or done in parallel, Makepeace develops residential and commercial projects
Example: Redbrook (Plymouth, MA) Master-planned village developed by Makepeace
Includes:
housing
commercial space
infrastructure
The TMUD Connection
The Tihonet Mixed Use Development (TMUD):
~6,500-acre master plan from the early 2000s
Spans Plymouth, Carver, Wareham
Does not include Redbrook which is under a different MEPA review
Originally intended for:
smart growth
mixed-use development
conservation
approved through a special MEPA (state environmental) review process
did not require full “EIR”; review for 12 solar projects from 2014 to present long-term buildout
a “ bait and switch ” from the original TMUD plan — MEPA let Makepeace out of the MEPA review process in 2022
12 solar projects covered in the TMUD, ADM released from MEPA 2022:
9 complete, 3 underway
Solar and sand mining projects not covered by TMUD MEPA Certificate or any MEPA review:
Maple Springs Solar, Wareham
Cranebrook Solar, Cranberry Road, Carver
0 Wareham St. Solar, Carver
Canning Solar, Plymouth (Frogfoot area)
All sand mining projects in Carver, Plymouth and Wareham are not covered by ANY MEPA REVIEW
Why This Model Is So Powerful
Same land generates revenue multiple times
Lands are stripped of all value, leaving barren wastelands
Land acquisition cost = zero (already owned)
Vertical integration = maximum control
Result:
Continuous, compounding income stream at the expense of biodiversity, habitat, cooling
shade, clean air, clean water
Oversight Concerns
Agricultural exemptions exploited:
Mining permitted under “cranberry agriculture”
Wetlands Protection Act exemptions for “Normal Improvement of Land in Agricultural Use” to evade permits
Tax preferences for agriculural land exploited
Fragmented permitting:
Mining, solar, development reviewed separately
No cumulative review
Impacts not assessed as one system
Environmental risks
Threats to:
Plymouth-Carver aquifer
Pine Barrens ecosystems
Community health from emissions of sand dust
Conclusion
A.D. Makepeace’s operations are no longer just agriculture — despite its image. They represent a fully integrated land monetization system where:
Cranberry farming provides the legal and historical foundation
Sand extraction generates immediate profits
Read Custom Soils adds value and scale
Solar leases provide steady income
Sevelopments like Redbrook deliver long-term returns
The public: left with a denuded wasteland — sand mines are barren lands where “nothing much will grow in human time” and no upside from solar, rapid development that strains infrastructure, undermines rural Southeatsern Massachusettts character
The result is a multi-layered, continuous revenue model built on the same land base.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2026-03-18-at-9.53.22-PM.png15521266Katherine Harrelsonhttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngKatherine Harrelson2026-04-01 16:01:342026-08-04 13:08:19A.D. Makepeace Co.’s Land Use Model: Cranberries, Sand, Solar, Residential/Commercial Development
CLWC takes legal action, demands Carver Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) issue a cease and desist to shut down AD Makepeace Co. Read sand trucking terminal
CLWC responds to Carver ZBA arguments at May 29, 2024 public hearing: You’re Wrong! Read the July 9, 2024 letter here.
CLWC fights to enforce laws on behalf of residents, environment
CLWC’s lawyers and scientists are working to get justice for residents and stop the environmental destruction by AD Makepeace’s sand mining. This trucking hub is the key to Makepeace’s sand sales. This facility does not have the required zoning permit from the Carver Planning Board.
CLWC is using the zoning laws to shut down Read. Here are the steps:
On February 22, 2024, CLWC demanded that the Carver Building Commissioner issue a cease and desist order to stop Read from operating a “Truck and Freight” terminal without the Special Permit. The CLWC demand letter is here.
The Building Commissioner refused to issue a cease and desist to Read. CLWC estimates Read generates up to 500 truck trips daily. The Building Commissioner did not investigate the issue of truck traffic volume.
On March 12, 2024 CLWC appealed to the ZBA under the state Zoning Law and the Town Zoning Bylaw. See the appeal here.
On May 22, 2024 CLWC requested the ZBA enforce their bylaws and issue a cease and desist at 46 Federal rd. Read the request here.
The hearing on CLWC’s enforcement request started on May 29, 2024 and continues July 17, 2024.
Carver Officials Ignore Years of Harms Suffered by Local Residents, Damage to Environment
Makepeace uses Read as a truck and freight terminal to sell and distribute sand it mines from its surround land. T
For a decade or more, Carver residents living near sand mining sites and who are impacted by truck traffic, noise and vibrations from mining operations have written, emails, and called state and local officials. They attend meetings of the Earth Removal Committee, Planning Board, Conservation Commission and Select Board to tell them about harms from the mining and trucking of sand and gravel abutting their homes.
Below: May, 2024: Massive AD Makepeace Co. 120 acre sand mine abutting Environmental Justice Community on Federal Road in Carver. This mine supplies Read Custom Soils with sand for commercial sale and distribution.
ZBA biased, sides with mining company over its own residents
During the May 29, 2024 public hearing on whether the ZBA should shut down Read, the ZBA was more concerned about protecting the interests of AD Makepeace Co., the owner of Read, rather than protecting residents’ health and well being
ZBA tried to dismiss the case on legal technicalities; this tactic is commonly used to deter residents from participating in the public process.
ZBA prevented Community Land and Water Coalition from presenting its slides, cut off residents as they spoke, and told residents that they had already spoken on this issue when they had not.
ZBA delayed its decision on the shut down until July 17, leaving residents to deal with the noise, vibrations and threat to drinking water for two more months.
The state law requires the ZBA to hold a public hearing on a request for enforcement of the zoning law. The ZBA must vote on whether there is a violation. CLWC has asked the ZBA to issue the cease and desist to Read. The first day of the ZBA public hearing was May 29, 2024. Watch the hearing here.
The ZBA chair argued with the lawyer for CLWC claiming the group had no legal right to bring the appeal. In a July 9, 2024 letter CLWC’s lawyer showed this is wrong. Read the letter here.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/825CE4B5-B7E5-409B-8169-F4DD92B336BD_1_105_c.jpeg6361236Meg Sheehanhttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngMeg Sheehan2024-07-10 19:36:492025-12-29 16:31:53Carver: Legal Efforts to Shut Down AD Makepeace Co. Sand Trucking Hub: Read Custom Soils
Leading hydrologist Scott Horsley says SLT’s dense housing proposal on the sand mine in Plympton threatens Town’s drinking water. Read his comments to the Town here
Demanding an environmental impact study: Three local groups submit comments to MEPA on June 22, 2026. See the letter here Groups RPBP MEPA COMMENTS
Over 1,500 comment letters sent to MEPA: Decision expected end of June 2026
Since 2018 CLWC and a wide grassroots network has fought to raise awareness about this sand mine. It is an approximately 40 acre site in Carver and Plympton on Route 44 going East at the Spring Street exit. Read more here
This photo below from December 5, 2021 shows the last remaining stand of trees on the hill in the center of the site.
July 8, 2024: Third Request of enforcement of Earth removal bylaws is sent to the Town of Plympton and their Board of Selectmen. The letter asks their to be an investigation into unauthorized earth removal at the site. Read the letter here.
June 24, 2024: New evidence alleges the mining at the site on Lot 3 is illegal and violates stormwater regulations. Read the memo here. A DEP hearing will be held on Sept. 4, at 100 Cambridge Street Suite 900, Boston, MA 02114.
May 15, 2024: CLWC sent a second demand letter to the Town of Plympton demanding that it enforce the town’s bylaws against SLT Construction. Read the letter here. May 15 2024 SLT Letter Final
July 30, 2025: A group of 10 residents sent a notice of intent to sue letter to prevent and minimize damages to the environment. Read the letter here.
The letter asserts “The evidence that SLT is engaged in large-scale earth removal on the Plympton side of the Property is indisputable.” The letter contains updated drone surveillance photos and a demand to enforce the Bylaw.
If the Town does not enforce the Bylaw, the public can go to court to enforce it.
Go to CLWC’s You Tube Channel to see drone videos like this one from December 2021 showing massive deforestation in just one day: here
In 2022, CLWC tried to enforce the Carver zoning laws against SLT. The Town refused to enforce the law and sided with SLT.
Read more about the public’s effort to enforce the Carver Earth Removal Bylaw against the illegal expansion of the mining operation onto the adjacent “Marob” property here.
Below: May 13, 2024. 0 Spring St.
The OADR from 2018 and 2022 don’t account for the impact on Rickett’s Pond and its Buffering Vegetative Wetlands (BVW) caused by sand and gravel deposits from the RPBP mining site, including Lot 3. These materials have been entering Rickett’s Pond since at least 2019. Since February 2018, the Project Site has undergone complete deforestation, alteration, and excavation to remove sand and gravel. These activities have significantly affected areas protected under environmental regulations. They could potentially change groundwater levels, which might affect the hydrology of nearby wetlands. Moreover, the changes in surface runoff patterns have redirected water flow from one sub-watershed to another, directly impacting the plant life and wildlife habitats in the surrounding areas. View drone footage of the site here.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/sand-mining_2.jpg9461594Meg Sheehanhttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngMeg Sheehan2024-05-28 14:07:312026-06-22 19:07:42Carver-Plympton: SLT Construction Sand Mining on Spring St.
Reject AD Makepeace request for $4 million donation of taxpayer money to build what’s required by its 2008 permit
Town Meeting Warrant Article 16C would give $4 million to private developer – Vote NO!
Company’s 2008 Planning Board permit requires 108 units of affordable housing, no need for public subsidy
Planning Board not holding Makepeace accountable
Background
In 2008, the Plymouth Planning Board gave AD Makepeace Co. a special permit under the town’s zoning laws to build about 1,300 housing units along the then pristine Agawam River in south Plymouth. This was a special deal for Makepeace-in exchange for promises of conservation land and affordable housing the town rezoned the land to allow dense development on small lots — increasing the value of Makepeace’s land overnight. Today, despite years of clearing pristine land and rapid construction of expensive housing units, roads and infrastructure, Makepeace has built only 15 of the 108 affordable units
Town’s Community Preservation Committee (CPC) votes to donate $4 million in taxpayer money to Makepeace
Instead of building the affordable housing with its own profits from Redbrook, its sand mining and its solar developments, Makepeace partnered with the Grantham Group to ask Plymouth taxpayers for $4,000,000 from the Community Preservation Committee (CPC) to help underwrite the $25 million project.
Shockingly, in December 2023, by a vote of 5-2 the CPC voted to give Makepeace the $4 million.
The donation has to be approved by the Plymouth Town Meeting to be held on April 6-8, 2024.
The Makepeace-Grantham request for taxpayer money cloaked as a ‘community benefit’ is another Makepeace scheme for making private profits from its lands.
Whether its claiming its sand and gravel mining business is merely cranberry “agriculture” or selling land to the state and making it look like a donation Makepeace turns public money and legal loopholes into private profits. The company motto is “Inspired by Nature.”
Town Meeting: Vote No on Article 16C: No to $4 million to Makepeace
Makepeace/Grantham Group wants $4 million from the CPC to underwrite 52 of the 108 affordable housing units Makepeace must build at Redbrook.
Broken promise: Under a 2008 Planning Board permit for Redbrook Makepeace must build 108 units of affordable housing. It has only built 15 units. The Town rezoned the land for dense development enabling Makepeace to build more houses at a lower cost. In exchange, it had to conserve land and build affordable units.
The taxpayers should not foot the bill for Makepeace’s permit obligation.
Makepeace’s plan for the 52 housing units will exclude the most needy – families and children.
Makepeace claims it is “donating” 4.5 acres of land “valued at $2.5 million” to Grantham to build the units. The Plymouth Assessor values the 4.5 acres at $174,000.00 – not millions. Is Makepeace claiming it will make no money from the project? Really?
More broken promises? Makepeace is missing conservation land owed to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a mining permit. Ten years ago in 2014, a ZBA permit required Makepeace to put 300 acres of land in conservation for a mining permit. This permit is 135 acres land near Frogfoot River in South Plymouth. The sand and gravel from the mine is worth about $100 million. In 2022, the ZBA ruled the Makepeace had not preserved the land. It’s now 10 years later.
Who is AD Makepeace? It is a sand and gravel mining company and real estate and industrial solar developer. Since at least 2005, it has been developing and mining thousands of acres of land for profit in Plymouth, Carver and Wareham. Redbrook is one of its development projects. It also owns and operates Read Custom Soils in Carver MA, claimed to be the largest aggregate mining and distribution facility in the Northeast.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/wareham-copy.png307640Katherine Harrelsonhttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngKatherine Harrelson2024-04-08 18:30:122025-12-29 16:57:35Plymouth: AD Makepeace @ Redbrook Seeks $4 million in taxpayer subsidies
UPDATE ON MORSE BROTHERS CRANBERRY LAWSUIT AGAINST TOWN OF HALIFAX TO EVADE REGULATION FOR SAND AND GRAVEL MINING
State’s highest court to hear arguments September 11, 2026
CLWC files Amicus Brief on August 21, 2026
For decades, Morse Brothers, a company with cranberry bogs that does commercial sand and gravel mining, has been mining on the shores of Monponsett Pond in Halifax, MA.
In 2022, residents decided they had enough: enough truck traffic through an Environmental Justice community on narrow country roads, mining in their drinking water aquifer, and destroying an archeological site known as the Whaleback. An acrimonious public meeting in fall 2022 led to two of three Boar
The Town issued two cease and desist orders – in December 2022 and July 2024 ordering Morse to stop illegal mining and apply for a permit. Morse applied, the Town granted the permit, but Morse did not like it so Morse sued the Town. Morse claims the mining is cranberry agriculture and exempt from permititng.
CLWC Urges Massachusetts’ Highest Court to Protect Towns’ Authority to Regulate Sand Mining
PLYMOUTH, MA — Community Land & Water Coalition (CLWC) has filed an amicus curiae brief with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Town of Halifax and Town of Halifax Select Board v. Morse Brothers, Inc., SJC-13911, urging the Court to preserve the longstanding authority of cities and towns to regulate sand, gravel, soil and loam removal. CLWC filed its brief on August 21, 2026.
The Halifax case has significance far beyond one cranberry operation or one town. At issue is whether Massachusetts municipalities can use their general earth-removal bylaws to regulate excavation even when the operator claims that the material being removed will ultimately be used for agriculture.
CLWC’s brief argues that state law has expressly authorized municipalities since 1949 to regulate or prohibit earth removal under G.L. c. 40, § 21(17), independently of municipal zoning authority. The Coalition warns that stripping towns of that power could leave communities without one of their most important tools for controlling the impacts of large-scale sand and gravel extraction.
“This case is about much more than Halifax,” said Meg Sheehan, attorney for CLWC. “Across Southeastern Massachusetts, communities are confronting large-scale removal of sand and gravel that can permanently alter the landscape. Towns need the authority the Legislature gave them to protect drinking water, neighborhoods, roads and natural resources. Calling sand mining ‘agriculture’ should not eliminate reasonable local oversight.”
CLWC’s brief describes the potential consequences of inadequately regulated earth removal: impacts to underground aquifers and shared water supplies, changes to stormwater runoff and topography, and loss of vegetation and wildlife habitat. These impacts implicate the health, safety and welfare of entire communities—not simply the use of an individual parcel of land.
Halifax itself argues that the public has a substantial interest in reasonable regulation of earth-removal operations associated with agricultural uses, including protection of public drinking-water supplies. The Town’s permit did not prohibit the earth removal; it allowed it subject to conditions intended to address environmental and neighborhood safety concerns.
The legal question is particularly important in Southeastern Massachusetts, where sand and gravel deposits, cranberry agriculture, forests, wetlands and drinking-water aquifers frequently occupy the same landscape. CLWC argues that the Legislature deliberately gave municipalities authority to develop local solutions to the harmful effects of unrestrained earth removal. The Coalition asks the SJC to preserve that authority rather than create an agricultural exemption capable of shielding substantial excavation from reasonable local regulation.
“Once a sand deposit is excavated and a landscape is fundamentally altered, those resources cannot simply be put back,” Sheehan said. “Local government is often the first—and sometimes the only—line of defense for residents living next to these operations.”
CLWC is a Massachusetts nonprofit grassroots coalition working to protect drinking water, forests, wetlands, rivers, streams, ponds and communities, with a particular focus on Southeastern Massachusetts.
Morse’s Legal Challenge to Earth Removal Permitting
CLWC’s legal brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court takes this head on. Read the August 21, 2026 Amicus Brief here. See the Court’s docket of the case here. The oral arguments before the Court is on September 11, 2026. It is open to the public and will be virtual.
About municipal regulation of Earth Removal. Halifax’s general bylaw prohibits earth removal due to its detrimental effects on water supplies, real estate values and the environment. See, General Bylaw, Chapter 144, “Soil Removal.” It prohibits earth removal on land zoned agricultural or residential unless the project qualifies for a permit. It states: “Section 144-1. Permit required. No soil, sand, gravel or loam removal shall be permitted in any area unless and until a permit has been granted by the Board of Selectmen.” There is a limited exemption for certain projects up to 1,000 cubic yards. IF the land is being used agriculturally, the landowner can apply for a permit to remove sand and gravel but it has to be “necessary and incidental” to the agricultural use of the land. To get a permit in 2016 for 50,000 cubic yards and when it applied for the 2022 permit for another 1.1 million cubic yards, Morse claimed the sand mining operation is “necessary” to build a bog and “incidental” to the existing use on the land. Neither is true: Morse cannot show it is necessary to build the bog or that the massive amount is “incidental”.
Morse has mined at least 165,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel the site but an accurate count has never been done.
Mining a Wampanoag Native American Site
Morse is strip mining a geological formation known as the Whaleback Ridge, a forested glacial esker.
The Whaleback is a known Native American Indigenous archeological site. The Whaleback’s hills are about 72 feet with peaks as high as 150 feet. The Whaleback has been studied for its archeological significance to the Indigenous people of the region, the Wampanoag Nation. Much of it has already been destroyed.
Listen here to the President of the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe about the importance of the area.
Below: Morse strip mine, Halifax MA, January 2023.
Mining in water supply protection zone
Morse is strip mining in the water protection zones for the Town’s drinking water wells supplied by the underground aquifer. This is against the law. One Halifax public water supply well already tested at 15 ppt for PFAS, just below the EPA limit of 20 ppt. Residents ask what would happen if the wells tested above the EPA limit for PFAS as a result of all of the earth removal in town. Would they have to buy treated water back from Brockton?
Mining trucks through Environmental Justice neighborhood
Noise, dust, and vibrations from Morse’s truck traffic within feet of homes
The trucking route is through an Environmental Justice community. Residents suffer harm from excessive truck traffic on narrow country roads and safety concerns.
Morse claims it has a “portfolio of approximately 300 total acres of cranberry growing” includes bogs in Halifax, Middleboro and Hanson. Morse claims it is hauling sand from town to town for these cranberry operations and it is exempt from earth removal regulations as “agriculture.” In 2016 the Town gave Morse a permit for 50,000 cubic yards. In April, 2022 Morse applied for another permit to expand by 1.14 million cubic yards. Facing fierce public opposition Morse withdrew the permit application in August 2022. Morse and Ryco Excavating kept mining.
In November, 2023, the Selectboard gave Morse a permit for 20,000 cubic yards, phase 1 of the previously proposed 1.1 million cubic yard operation.
The money: skyrocketing value of sand and gravel
Morse is seeking a permit for 1,140,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel — about $15 million in revenue. The 20,000 cubic yards it recently mined is worth about $200,000.00
Morse’s controller testifies in a sworn affidavit that the Halifax bogs produce about 18,200 barrels of cranberries annually, worth about $820, 000 in annual total revenue. Multiple sources put the cost of production of a barrel of cranberries at $30-35 per barrel. For Morse’s Halifax bogs, the cost of production for 18,200 barrels would be about $546,000 to 637,000. This means cranberries from the Halifax bogs generate about $183,000 and $290,000 in annual profits. The controller testifies that Morse has a contract with Ovia Hannula Cranberry for “management contracts” that requires Morse to pay Hannula about $530,000 per year to manage the Halifax bogs, on the low end of a cost of production. Profits from sand and gravel mining of about $1 million per year for 5 years outweighs cranberry profits even in the best scenario at $290,000. per year.
Ten Residents Send Notice of Intent to Sue for Damage to the Environment Letter
On July 24, 2024, a Ten Residents Group send a notice of intent to sue letter to Morse Bros., Oiva Hannula Cranberry Co., Ryco Excavating and state agencies.
Read the full coverage of the cease and desist letter, an overview of the Whaleback glacial formation, the history of the cranberry industry’s connection to sand mining, and more, in this in-depth coverage by the Plymouth County Observer.
July 18, 2024
For the second time in two years, the Town of Halifax issued a cease and desist order to Morse Brothers to stop strip mining on the shores of Monponsett Pond. The Town issued a $30,000 civil penalty for mining violations. The victory is directly attributable to the relentless grassroots efforts of Halifax Community for Conservation Efforts
From the Board’s letter:
Multiple truckloads of earth have recently been observed leaving the property. In addition, you stated in an email message to Town Administrator Cody Haddad dated July 12, 2024 that approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material resulting from the prior screening of sand was being moved from the property.
Notwithstanding your assertions in the July 12, 2024 email message, the recent earth removal was not authorized by the Soil Removal Permit because Morse Brothers had already removed almost all of the earth authorized by the Soil Removal Permit.
By letter dated May 3, 2024, Attorney Rosenberg stated that 19,908 yards of sand/earth had been removed from the property during the period of February 12, 2024 to April 5, 2024.
Also, the Board of Selectmen hereby assesses a fine of $30,000 (1500 cubic yards x $20) against Morse Brothers for the recent earth removal, which was performed without a permit pursuant to the Soil Removal By- law and constitutes multiple violations of the Soil Removal By-law. Attached please find written notice of violation pursuant to M.G.L. c.40, §21D.
The Halifax Board of Selectmen met on Tuesday, July 23. They began by entering into executive session to discuss negotiations with the Assistant Town Accountant as well as to discuss strategy with respect to litigation involving Morse Brothers….. Selectmen Chair John Bruno said, “We were made aware recently that Morse Brothers had started or were engaged in trucking what we think is sand, gravel, or some such thing off of their property over the last week or so, couple of weeks, I guess. Once we were made aware of that we discussed with Counsel what to do and the result of that is that the Board has issued a letter to Morse Brothers constituting a cease-and-desist order and an assessment of a fine for multiple violations of the town of Halifax’s soil removal bylaw.” He noted that the letter, which he read during the meeting, had been sent on July 18. A portion of the letter read, “the recent earth removal was not authorized by the soil removal permit because Morse Brothers had already removed almost all of the soil authorized by the soil removal permit. By letter dated May 3, 2024, Attorney Rosenberg stated that 19,908 yards of sand/earth had been removed from the property during the period of February 12, 2024 to April 5, 2024.” The letter also noted that the total earth removal allowed by the bylaw was plus or minus 20,000 cubic yards. Bruno told those assembled that they had been advised by Counsel not to discuss the matter any further in open session.
February 5, 2024
Court denies Morse request for an injunction to stop Halifax from requiring an earth removal permit
January 26, 2024
Media Story here: Sand Wars in Halifax Continue reports the Plympton Halifax Kingston Express — Read the story here
December 2023
Town refuses to enforce zoning bylaw prohibiting mining in drinking water protection district
In late November, 2023 Halifax residents sent a demand for enforcement of the zoning law to the zoning officer of Halifax asking them to rule that the Board of Selectmen Nov. 16, 2023 permit to Morse Brothers, Inc. was illegal. In 2022, the former zoning officer said it was illegal. Yet in 2023, the new zoning officer said the mining was OK under the zoning laws. See the letter here: Halifax Zoning Enforcement Demand Nov 2023
Here’s the building inspector’s denial letter.
November 2023
Town grants earth removal permit, Morse goes to court claiming permit too strict
On November 6, 2023 the Board of Selectmen granted Morse a permit for additional 20,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel. They imposed permit conditions which Morse did not like so it sued the Town. Morse claimed the permit conditions interfere with their “agriculture.” The court denied Morse’s request for an injunction on 2/5/2024. See the court decision here. Superior Ct Denial Morse Motion for Injunction Judge Glenny-2-5-24
The November 6, 2023 hearing on the permit filled the Town Hall to near-capacity. About two dozen Halifax residents spoke against the permit. Not one member of the public spoke for the permit. The public’s concerns and information presented included:
Threats to public safety from truck traffic on local, unpaved roads
No benefit to Halifax but a detriment resulting in deforestation, taking earth from Halifax and moving it to another town, and adding 750 truck trips to already deteriorating and degraded roads
The impact of tractor trailer trucks on underground water and gas lines that lie only about 18″ below the road used as the trucking route. This includes concerns about a possible gas explosion or water main break from the pressure of the loaded trucks .
Safety of children, many of whom walk or ride their bikes on the road used as the trucking route
Mining in a water protection district — the town’s zoning law clearly prohibits mining in well protection zones
Does the Board have authority to issue this permit? Does it require a special permit first, as required because it is not agriculture under the bylaws
If this earth removal was for agricultural purposes the sand would be used on site but most but not all 20,000 cubic yards of earth will be removed from the site and likely out of town.
Where is the sand going?
In 2023, the company sought a permit for about 1.1 million cubic yards (see below). It withdrew the permit application in the face of fierce public opposition. Clearly the November, 2023 permit is just Phase 1 of Morse’s plan to excavate the entire 1.1 million cubic yards.
May 2023
Fifteen residents file lawsuit
On May 5, 2023, fifteen Halifax residents filed a civil complaint against Morse, Oiva Hannula Cranberry of Carver, and Ryco Excavating, Inc. and its related entity, Ryco Leasing and Repair, Inc. for “engaging in unpermitted earth removal on the property located at 250 Lignan Street, Halifax.”
The complaint is here. The residents asked the court to issue a preliminary injunction to stop the operation until the case goes trial and got resolved. Stopping the operation is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the environment and residents. The injunction request is here. On June 21, 2023, Superior Court Judge Glenny denied the residents’ motion for an injunction siding with Morse, Hannula and Ryco. The Decision is here. The case was eventually dismissed.
Morse Brothers opposed the injunction and submitted the affidavit of the company’s controller, Brendan Moquin. It is very revealing: it says if Morse is prevented from sand and gravel mining it would be “catastrophic” to Morse’s business. The company makes elaborate claims about all the earth materials needed to maintain its bogs, but the numbers tell another story.
January 10, 2023
On January 10, 2023, the Halifax Selectboard held a meeting to hear residents concerns and address violations of a December 2022 cease and desist. The public, including members of the Halifax Community for Conservation Efforts, presented clear evidence of the violations. They described the threat to public safety from Ryco’s truck traffic, drinking water, nearby conservation lands, wetlands, and “outstanding water resources.”
A mother spoke about her fear of the safety of their children from constant sand and gravel trucks traveling through the residential street.
Residents spoke about damage to the Town’s street infrastructure from trucks: culverts in danger of breaking and dangerous road conditions. Residents reported Morse had unlawfully cut the tree buffer along the shore of Monponsett pond.
Residents explained Morse Brothers has dredged into the aquifer, exposing drinking water to contamination. The mining is within a Zone II Wellhead Protection Area, within Public Supply Watershed, within a Zone A and Zone C Surface Water Protection Area, within an Outstanding Water Resource Area, adjacent to Freshwater Wetlands. It is also adjacent to the Stump Brook Mass Audubon conservation land. Before Morse clear cut and strip mined the 15 acre site it was categorized as Prime Forestland.
At the meeting, Morse Brothers claimed that all the sand gravel removed was going to other bogs they own in Middleborough and Hanson. Residents reported Morse is filling their bogs in Hanson, Middleborough, and at 537 Thompson Street in Halifax with sand 3-4 ft deep. They asked, Why are they filling the bogs with so much sand? Moving earth out of the town without a valid permit, which Morse did not have, is illegal. While Morse attempted to claim an agricultural exemption from the permit requirement, this was not legitimate. Other bogs on the nearby sites are failing due to the high water table.
According to Halifax resident Jeremy Gillespie, “The issue really is, why are they taking the sand out of our water supply protection zones? When they received taxpayer funded grant money from the state for the Middleborough bog project, did they let the state know they’d be taking the sand from these water supply protection zones in another town, whose water supply has been noted as highly susceptible to contamination and abutting the shores of an impaired public water supply lake with an EPA enforceable TMDL?” Read more below about Morse’s taxpayer grants.
December 29, 2022
Town issues cease and desist to Morse and Ryco
Even though Morse withdrew the mining permit application in 2022 (see above) Morse and Ryco Excavating and trucking kept mining at the site.
In December 29, 2022 the Town Board of Selectment issued a Cease & Desist Order to Morse Brothers to stop sand mining. The Cease and Desist is below. Morse, Ryco and Hannula kept conducting earth removal anyway and violated the Cease and Desist according to residents and witnesses.
“The Board is asking that you stop any earth removal…” – December 29, 2022 Letter from the Town of Halifax Board of Selectmen
August 2022
Morse withdraws application to mine 1 million cubic yards of sand and gravel
In early 2022, Morse filed a permit application with the Town to remove more sand and gravel – 1.1 million cubic yards over 4-5 years from the Lignan Street area. Morse withdrew the application on August 12, 2022 when faced with public opposition. Morse claimed the huge operation was “incidental” to its cranberry operations.
In August, 2022, the controversy and backlash from residents about the illegal mining operation and expansion proposal resulted in the abrupt resignation of two of the Town’s three Selectboard members. The Chair was working for the company doing the excavation and trucking, Ryco Excavating. This was clearly a conflict of interest. The abrupt resignations were the subject of a Boston Globe article that however missed the point about the sand controversy.
June 2022
Public hearing on Morse’s application for 1,140,000 million cubic yards of sand and gravel
The Halifax Selectmen met in-person on the evening of June 14. There was a public hearing for earth removal for the Morse Brothers’ cranberry property. Selectman Alex Meade said, “I remember most of the residents’ concerns were about the roadway itself and dust control. Since then, we’ve had questions about runoff from the trucks so leaking hydraulics things like that. I don’t know if you plan on putting in some kind of catch basin filters in?” “Certainly, we would be willing to talk about that,” the Morse Brothers representative said.
Meade said he would like to have a clear-cut definition of what the expectations are for the road condition as well as dust control. The spokesman said that the earth removal was necessary because the current layout is not conducive to newer ways of growing cranberries. “The things that we are talking about make sense for cranberry production. If we change the property to the new way, it now becomes a highest and best use for that property… there are good things for the town, there are good things for the grower… at the end of the day, we just want to coexist,” he continued.
They showed maps of the property to the residents present for the hearing and said that they were also available at Mass Mapper under Zone 2. Residents spoke about their concerns including home depreciation and the safety of children. One resident said that they already deal with being inconvenienced in September and October but said that was just part of the cranberry business. He said, however, that this was different and would cause disruption for years. Another resident said that he worries about the environmentalimpact of the properties surrounding the one in question including walking trails leading into Burrage. Another resident asked that the official abutters list be expanded to include more properties. Someone else expressed concern about the ability of first responders to get through to homes given the heavy truck traffic which was described as sounding like an “earthquake.”
The Selectmen agreed to do a site visit and then revisit the project in early August. “I don’t think we are at a point in this project to vote either way,” Selectmen Chair Ashley DiSesa said. [DiSesa works for Ryco and subsequently resigned from the Board]
April 2022
Morse applies for permit to expand sand mine
In April 2022, Morse applied to the Halifax Selectboard for a permit to remove 1.14 million cubic yards of sand and gravel to create “cranberry bogs and water supply ponds.” This would entail about 35 truck trips on week days for 5-6 years. It would level the Whaleback esker and mine in the aquifer. The total site disturbance is 67.1 acres.
Town’s report on Morse Brother’s earth removal permit application for 1,140,000 cubic yards on the Whaleback Ridge
On August 4, 2023, the Attorney General slammed Plymouth Town Officials for Open Meeting Law Violations. Read the Press Release and Decision below.
CLWC is continuing its campaign for accountability and transparency in Plymouth Town Hall by making sure the Open Meeting Law is followed and exposing backroom deals
More Open Meeting Law violations claimed
Update: Thursday, August 24, 2023: Attorney General rules January Determination 2023-136 saying twice there was no violation but it was a “close call”. This OML complaint was about the Selectboard’s failure to provide sufficient notice of the topic of its executive session held on November 29, 2022. Meeting notices must be specific enough so the public knows what the Board is talking about in the executive session. The November 29, 2022 meeting notice/agenda identified the topic only as “1000 acres” which typically is not adequate. The Attorney General ruled that “The complaint before us presents a close question” on whether this was adequate notice. It said it did not find a violation, but “we encourage the Board to include additional identifying information, such as the boundaries of the area, in the future.” See the AG Ruling here:
Update: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 Plymouth Selectboard meeting reveals backlog of almost a year of minutes
At the Selectboard’s August 22, 2023 meeting they made statement about the Attorney General’s August 4, 2023 ruling that the Selectboard and ZBA have committed numerous violations of the Open Meeting Law. The meeting notice also showed the Selectboard approved 26 sets of overdue open meeting minutes and 6 sets of executive session minutes.
The backlog of minutes shows the Selectboard has been in violation AGAIN of the Open Meeting Law. The law requires minutes to be approved within 3 meetings – the Selectboard is behind by MONTHS. All of this occurred while Betty Cavacco was chair of the Selectboard.
Deflect, defame & deny — why not comply?
The Selectboard is desperately trying to evade responsibility for four more Open Meeting Law complaints filed against them on May 15, 2023. The complaints include an illegal “executive session” secret meeting for “30 Town Wharf” and “158 Center Hill Road “. The second one is for failing to do minutes. The Open Meeting Law requires the Selectboard to respond to the complaints within two weeks. Instead of following the law and responding, Chair Betty Cavacco completely ignored the complaints. Left with no choice to get compliance, CLWC appealed to the Attorney General’s Office on August 1, 2023. The Selectboard then directed former Chair Cavacco’s hand-picked “Town Counsel” Attorney Bergeron to spend taxpayer money to attempt to evade responsibility by writing a 25 page letter on August 18, 2023.Why didn’t this new Town Counsel keep the Selectboard out of trouble in the first place?
Read CLWC’s August 22, 2023 letter to the Attorney General responding to the Town here.
Update: On August 23, 2023, the Attorney General’s Office replied to the Town’s August 18, 2023 ranting, conspiracy-laden letter about the May 15, 2023 Open Meeting Law complaints. The Attorney General rejected all of the Town’s complaints and efforts to dodge compliance. The Attorney General wrote:
August 23, 2023: Attorney General’s Office to Town Counsel
Attorney Bergeron,
This email responds to your August 18 letter. First, please note that I am unable to formally grant an extension of time for the Plymouth Select Board to respond to the Open Meeting Law complaints. A request for an extension of time to respond must be submitted within the time for responding to the complaint (14 business days from receipt of the complaint). See 940 CMR 29.05(5)(b). However, the Select Board is absolutely still welcome to submit any information or argument it wishes our office to consider. I see that you submitted a response to two of the complaints today, which we will add to the corresponding files, and you are welcome to submit any additional relevel information. Based on current complaint volumes and workload, I am confident AAG Kilcoyne and I will not be reviewing these complaints for at least another month, as you request, and likely not for closer to three months or longer.
The Open Meeting Law does not contain any requirements about eligibility or standing to file an Open Meeting Law complaint; any person may file a complaint. The complainant need not be disinterested (nor need they have any direct interest or stake in the matter). Additionally, we do not consider an administrative Open Meeting Law complaint filed with our office (as opposed to an action under G.L. c. 30A, § 23(f)) to be litigation or akin to litigation. We do not treat the administrative OML complaint process as an adversarial proceeding between two parties; rather, the complainant files a complaint to bring a possible OML violation to our office’s attention, and we then investigate the matters raised in the complaint. We keep the complainant apprised of the status of our review and send the complainant a copy of the final determination letter so they are aware of the outcome, but the complainant is not a “party” to an OML complaint review and has no right to judicial review of a complaint resolution under G.L. c. 30A, § 23(d).
I hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely,
Carrie Benedon (she/her/hers)
Assistant Attorney General
Director, Division of Open Government
Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General
The Town’s August 18, 2023 letter to the Attorney General is so defamatory, inaccurate and misleading we will not post it here. In it the Town Counsel makes excuses for Cavacco’s refusal to address the May 15, 2023 complaints. He asks for an “extension.” The rambling, conspiracy-theory letter written with Town taxpayer money is just the old tactic of “deflect, defame and deny” when you know you are caught doing an illegal act. Why not just comply?
Demanding a complete investigation by the Attorney General
The taxpayer’s money would have been better spent on coming into compliance with the Open Meeting Law instead of writing a rant to the Attorney General. CLWC is asking the Attorney General to use its powers under the Open Meeting Law, General Laws Chapter 30A, Sections 18-25 to get to conduct a full investigation to get to the bottom of what is going on. The public deserves total transparency and accountability from all boards, committees and staff in Town Hall.
CLWC Press Release on Attorney General’s Ruling against Plymouth Officials
Plymouth, MA (August 11, 2023):Attorney General Slams Town Officials Over Open Meeting Law Violations
The Attorney General (AG) of Massachusetts, Division of Open Government has ruled that the Town of Plymouth Selectboard and Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) violated the state’s Open Meeting Law in multiple ways when they held a joint meeting on November 15, 2022 in “executive session” out of public view to discuss a “Development Agreement” with Claremont Plymouth LLC. Claremont was seeking ZBA approval for 348 apartments at the Colony Place mall at the time. Based on the Development Agreement discussed illegally in the secret meeting, the ZBA granted the project a special permit under the Zoning Bylaws.
The Attorney General’s ruling is a harsh rebuke to the Selectboard’s leadership under former chair Betty Cavacco and current ZBA chair Michael Main. The August 4, 2023 ruling states that, “in light of the number and breadth of Open Meeting Law violations” Selectboard and ZBA must undergo Open Meeting Law training with the AG’s office and certify that they have done so within 95 days. The AG ordered the Selectboard and ZBA to come into “immediate and future compliance” with the law and take other remedial steps.
The local group Community Land & Water Coalition (CLWC) brought the Open Meeting Law complaints when the public learned the Selectboard and ZBA jointly met in secret in November 2022 to discuss a deal with Claremont about affordable housing and water. The Town’s expert report in October 2022 said the Town’s water supply is inadequate for the project. The Town officials negotiated to make a deal to allow the project to happen. In March, after the ZBA approved a special permit based on the deal discussed in the illegal meeting, residents appealed the ZBA permit to court.
Selectboard and ZBA’s Secret Water Deal
The Selectboard’s Development Agreement provides that in exchange for a special permit from the ZBA, Claremont will pay the Town about $2 million for a new water pump for the West Plymouth Water District. What the Town officials did not disclose is that Claremont will actually pay about $700,000 because the Selectboard and ZBA agreed to waive about $1.3 million in building and reduce the affordable housing trust fees by 23%.
The AG’s ruling stated that the joint meeting to discuss “affordable housing” and the water deal was not a proper purpose for “executive session” under the Open Meeting Law. The Law states that public bodies can only meet in executive session for narrow, limited purposes, such as discussions of personnel matters. Negotiating behind closed doors and meeting in secret to make sure developers can build their projects is not a legitimate “executive session” topic.
Town Officials Thwart Purpose of Open Meeting Law
The purpose of the Open Meeting Law is to promote democracy and ‘government in the sunshine’ by requiring public bodies to follow regulations enacted to ensure transparency and accountability. Public bodies such as the Selectboard and ZBA must give specific notice of the subject of their meetings so the public knows what they are meeting about, they must conduct meetings in public except in limited circumstances, and must take and maintain accurate meeting minutes. The AG’s Decision found the Selectboard and ZBA violated the law by meeting in secret, not giving proper public notice, and not creating minutes of their meetings.
Veil of Secrecy
“We are pulling back the veil of secrecy in the way the Selectboard and ZBA operate. Making secret deals with private developers is an egregious abuse of the Open Meeting Law,” said Meg Sheehan of CLWC. “The Selectboard, ZBA, Conservation Commission and Planning Board are showing a clear bias in favor of developers. Making backroom deals like this harms the public interest in clean water and a sustainable environment. Secret meetings, rubber stamp permits and secret deals will not be tolerated,” said Sheehan.
How secrecy harms our community
Pamela Magnarelli of the nearby neighborhood said, “As one of the residents who will be aggrieved by the new Claremont development, it was very disheartening to learn that the Town Selectboard and ZBA were violating Open Meeting Laws during negotiations with Claremont. Discussions concerning development in Plymouth must always include public input, especially as it relates to the impact on the natural environment. Improper executive sessions that only look at a developers’ point of view are detrimental to all Plymouth residents. We don’t need to go back any further than this current year to see how climate change is impacting Plymouth, the United States and the world. Plymouth residents need to have the opportunity to hear and evaluate Town proposals and express concerns on how the Claremont project (or any project) is going to affect water quality and quantity, pollution, wildlife, and density for a part of West Plymouth that has seen enormous residential and commercial growth in the past 2 years,” Magnarelli said.
For more information, visit Community Land & Water Coalition’s website.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/legal-picture-copy.png6441080CLwpBShttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngCLwpBS2023-08-22 18:49:452025-12-29 17:03:00Plymouth: Attorney General Slams Selectboard and ZBA for Open Meeting Law Violations; CLWC continues to demand compliance, transparency at Town Hall
This page documents the failure of the Conservation Commission to do its job. It repeatedly violates the Open Meeting Law and issues waivers and exemptions with no legitimate grounds.
West Pond violations
Extensive violations reported and documented at 403 Federal Furnace Road in 2019. This includes destroying pond shore of a Priority Habitat pond with rare and endangered species. The Commission has refused to require the landowner to complete the “restoration” required by law. New violations occurred in March 2022 and were reported. When the Commission did nothing in 2019, a resident was forced to appeal to the state. Neither the state nor DEP have done anything to remedy the violations as of October 2023.
Herring Pond violations
Multiple violations reported by residents and Herring Pond Watershed Association. Violations reported in public meetings of the Conservation Commission. As of October 2023, the Commission has taken no action.
Boot Pond violations
Violations reported in 2022: clearing endangered species habitat, forests, vegetation on pond shore. Action to date: nothing reported
South Ponds Preserve – Town Forest violations
The Town is not doing its job to protect the Forest. The state is responsible too: find out more on this page. Violations are documented below
2022
August 17, 2022: violations continued the past two weeks. On 8/17/22 at about 7 p.m. fishing boat with gas engines go on the pond. The CR allows electric engines only. Harbormaster called. No signs say “no gas motors.”
August 4, 9:59 p.m. Illegal fire near aqueduct. Reported to Plymouth Fire Dept. and extinguished.
July 27, 2022-Wednesday. Erosion from Drew Road to Little South Pond in the Town Forest. This has been ongoing since 2020 when illegal parking on Drew Road eroded the road banking. Violation of Wetlands Protection Act, Conservation Restriction.
July 27, 2022 Drew Road Town Forest. Illegal trail resulting in runoff into Little South Pond.
July 23, 2022-Sunday
Report of ATV’s accessing Little South Pond/Drew Road beach via the Town DPW water supply well site on Rocky Pond Road. ATV tracks observed on Little South Pond beach.
Police called, “too busy” to address report of about 20 people swimming in Little South Pond and using blow up flotation devices; cars illegally parked along Drew Road.
More to come…
2020
August 2020: Plymouth Board of Selectmen agree that CR prohibits swimming, make this announcement. What happened?
Strip mining and earth removal occurring on Spring Street near Rickett’s Pond in Carver, MA
SLT’s mining operation banned in the Spring Street Innovation District, says group; asked Carver Zoning Board of Appeals to enforce the law.
The Carver Zoning Board of Appeals refused to enforce the zoning bylaw against the SLT mining operation on Spring Street in Carver in 2022. Residents appealed the ZBA’s decision to court. After over a year of legal proceedings, in late 2023 the residents withdrew their case and pursued other options to address the environmental and human harms caused by this project. According to social media statements by AGT Trucking which hauls sand for SLT Construction, the company is under investigation by the Office of Inspector General.
STPB says industrial sand mining is banned in this area of town which is zoned as the “Spring Street Innovation District.”
In April 2015, Carver Town Meeting voters changed the zoning to “Spring Street Innovation District” from residential with the promise that this would be an “innovative” business park.” Instead, the Zoning Board of Appeals has been allowing strip mining for over four years. SLT plans to continue mining around Rickett’s Pond which could take another two years.
The mine’s operator, SLT Corporation has been extracting sand and gravel from the site since at least 2018. Pictures and videos document the recent rapid progress of SLT’s forest clear-cutting and strip mining. Sand from the site is polluting Rickett’s Pond. Neighbors’ homes are very close by and their yards and cars are covered with silt and dust every day. They suffer from extreme noise from logging and mining equipment, trucks, and their homes shake when SLT is mining.
SLT claims it is just building a “roadway, stormwater utilities and drainage.” STPB spokesperson Meg Sheehan asks, “Who’s kidding who? The pictures tell it all. We are simply asking the Zoning Board of Appeals to do its job and enforce the zoning laws passed by the voters of Carver,” Sheehan added.
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png00CLwpBShttps://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.pngCLwpBS2022-03-02 19:02:382025-12-29 16:56:04Carver: Lawsuit to challenge ZBA and SLT Construction’s Spring Street mining site violations