• Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • TikTok
  • Contact Us
Community Land & Water Coalition, Inc.
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Grassroots Organizing & Advocacy
    • Indigenous Rights and Culture
    • CLWC Leadership
    • Contact Us
  • Support Us
    • Ways to Support CLWC
    • Donate
  • Our Work
    • Stop Sand Mining
    • Protecting Wetlands, Waterways and Drinking Water
    • Forests & Biodiversity
    • Responsible Solar & Energy Siting
    • Take Action Right Now!
  • Resources
    • In the Press
    • Education
    • Blog
    • Podcasts
    • YouTube Channel
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Calendar
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

59 Federal Road, Carver MA: A.D. Makepeace Continues Mining, Residents Say Enough is Enough

August 24, 2026

For decades, Carver residents have dealt with sand blowing onto their homes, yards, cars, streets, and neighborhoods, while expressing concerns about their drinking water and public health to state and local officials for years.

February 17, 2026: Community stands up to 10 years of sand mining at 59 Federal Road in residential neighborhoods

CLWC, researchers and residents document cumulative impacts to environment, health impacts from Silica Dust and harms to residents

CLWC 2026.02.13  comments are here

CLWC Exhibits to Comment Letter

ERC allows AD Makepeace to continue mining

Over 22 years, 11 cubic yards of sand and gravel mining by AD Makepeace Co. along Federal Road alone, more in other towns and areas of Carver. 

AD Makepeace Co. of Wareham mines the sand on its land to supply its subsidiary, Read Custom Soils located at 46 Federal Road. An overview of Read is here and legal efforts taken can be found here. 

In January, 2025, the  Carver ERC considered issuing a cease and desist for sand mine at 59 Federal Rd. then backs down — allows business as usual, while residents are exposed to Respirable Crystalline Silica, dust, noise and unsafe road conditions.

Below: AD Makepeace mining operation, December 2025, 59 Federal Road, Carver MA. Exposed groundwater is visible in the lower right and middle left. Vast areas of Carver Loamy Course Soil, a source of Respirable Silica Dust, are visible. View the drone footage of December 2025 here.

Read more about the health hazards of Respirable Crystalline Silica dust here. 

Makepeace’s 2024 proposed expansion for more “cranberry agriculture” at 59 Federal Road, Carver

In 2024, AD Makepeace applied to the ERC to expand the massive 85 acre mine at 59 Federal Road,  including dredging in the Aquifer. The plans are on hold, according to Makepeace.

Below: Makepeace proposed expansion, 2024.

  • Makepeace’s proposed expansion at 59 Federal Road will be 650 feet from residential drinking water wells; GAF Engineering relies 30-year-old report to claim mining won’t harm wells

  • Makepeace withdrew plans after public hearing, but continues mining 85 acre site, below. 

Above: June 15, 2024: 59 Federal Road, Carver, MA. The Cranberry Village neighborhood is at the bottom of the picture.  In 2024, Makepeace filed a permit application to expand the mine to the southwest. As of May 2025, it has been withdrawn. The mining began in about 2016 with the clearing of land and mining sand and gravel for the solar project seen in the top of the photo. Read more about the solar project here. 

Drone Video here. 

Recent Events

October 1, 2024 Town of Carver ERC Public Hearing

“I have attended almost every Earth Removal Committee meeting since 2021. I have heard every cranberry company, trucking company and the Earth Removal Commitee members misrepresent massive sand mining projects as “cranberry agriculture” or “subdivisions.” These are half-truths and part of a coordinated effort to strategically misrepresent sand mining to evade local bylaws.”

-Attorney Meg Sheehan, CLWC

“I’m actually here to ask for a moratorium on the sand mining so that it can be studied—not just the Earth removal plans, but the whole operation of sand mining and how it’s affecting our area, the wildlife, the waters, and the people who live here.  It’s just an enormous operation… it’s a wasteland. It’s loud… there’s humming and beeping… I think about all the creatures that are being dug up and the aquifer that’s threatened.”

                                  -Linda Jacobs, neighbor and resident of Cranberry  Village, Carver MA

“ I hope that we aren’t just going to pretend that these things aren’t happening down there, because they are and I think most of us know that.”

“It’s just extremely upsetting to me that the town seems to, as the woman said before me, favor big business over human beings.”

“I wish the town would pay as much attention to projects that impact our community’s wellbeing as they do to debating the zoning of business signs”.

Carver residents at Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing, 5/29/24

 

Impacts to drinking water, no study ever done! 

“I don’t know about anyone else, but I don’t think I could afford water being piped in from another town.. A lot of people like Carver because we have well water. And we want to protect our water”. 

—Cranberry Village resident at Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing on 5/29/2024 on petition to shut down Makepeace’s Read Custom Soils trucking terminal on Federal Road.

Read more about the impacts to the aquifer ” Report from world renown hydrologist, Scott Horsley here. 

Impacts of sand dust, noise, vibrations

Residents in South Carver are a ground zero for AD Makepeace’s industrial scale sand mining. The mining is getting  ever closer to homes. 

 Read Custom Soils, 46 Federal Road, trucking depot for AD Makepeace sand mining operations

Read Custom Soils, Makepeace’s sand distribution operation, is across from Cranberry Village at 46 Federal Road. Read more about Read Custom Soils here.

Environmental Justice neighborhoods

Below: Map of Environmental Justice communities in Carver. Blue represents Makepeace’s sand mining site at 59 Federal Road. The yellow areas two EJ neighborhoods that directly abut Makepeace’s 59 Federal Road mining site.

Above: AD Makepeace mining site at 59 Federal Road abutting Cranberry Village to the right. Sand covers homes and cars, vibrations from tree clearing and mining shake homes,  dangerous truck traffic threatens safety.

 

 

Find out how to take action here

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/sand_1.jpg 616 1200 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2026-08-24 01:19:172026-08-23 13:45:5259 Federal Road, Carver MA: A.D. Makepeace Continues Mining, Residents Say Enough is Enough

Carver: Meadow Street Sand Mine: Jury Returns Verdict

August 12, 2026

 

August 11, 2026

MASSACHUSETTS JURY FINDS SAND MINE OPERATOR LIABLE; TRIAL REVEALS NEW SILICA DUST AND HEALTH EVIDENCE

Nearly four years after CLWC published an investigation on the sand mining operating at 0 Meadow Street in Carver, Massachusetts— and after years of complaints by Meadow Street residents — a Plymouth Superior Court jury returned a verdict a 2023 case brought by two neighbors impacted by the operation. The jury awarded a total of $530,000 in damages to the neighbors. See it here: Jury Verdict: August 11, 2026

The Plymouth County Superior Court jury trial lasted from July 27 to August 11, 2026 when the jury returned the verdict on three claims under the 2023 complaint. The jury  found the sand mine operator G. Lopes Construction and the landowner Bette Maki operating under the Alex Johnson and Sons cranberry company liable under the three counts. First, under private nuisance, the jury found both G, Lopes Construction and Maki contributed to conditions substantially and unreasonably interfering with the neighbors’ use and enjoyment of their property. On that nuisance finding, it allocated 80% of the fault to G. Lopes Construction and 20% to Maki.

The jury separately found that G. Lopes Construction caused dust, sand, sediment or another thing for which it was legally responsible to enter the neighbors’ property, that the company was negligent, that the entry was not authorized by the neighbors and that the entry caused legally recoverable harm. On the negligent-trespass claim, the jury allocated 100% of the fault to G. Lopes Construction. The completed verdict slip awards each Beadling $15,000 for property damage and $200,000 for pain and suffering on that claim.

The verdict follows a trial based on new evidence about the silicon dioxide components of Carver loamy soil which was being mined and generated Respirable Crystalline Silica according to experts. The mining operation lasted over 13 years and generated at least 54,000 truck trips to haul the sand and gravel. The trucks passed within 35 feet of neighbors’ front doors, on narrow country roads, causing air pollution, noise and vibration compounded by the mining operation itself.

Below: Map showing forested land where the mining operation dredged in the Sole Source Aquifer. This is before the mining. Below is after the mining.

Above:  March 17, 2022. The mining site owned and operated by Maki and G. Lopes Construction at 0 Meadow Street. Before the mining, the area shown as a open water was  forested upland area. A total of 19 acres was strip mined and the operation dredged the Sole Source Aquifer, exposing it to contamination.

Wathc the Drone Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MPSWuw0BDI&t=6s

From complaints to accountability

At the trial, the plaintiffs testified that they had brought the situation to the Town’s attention since at least 2014 about sand covering the property, excessive noise, traffic and speeding trucks. Two neighbors who were not plaintiffs testified about vibrations from truck traffic so hard they caused a picture to fall off the wall.  Another testified that there was so much sand on his deck he used a leaf blower.

The trial record ultimately included resident testimony, company records, site sampling, laboratory silica analysis, meteorological analysis, engineering evidence, land-use and aquifer analysis, and pulmonary medical testimony.

The jury then made a finding that goes directly to the central issue CLWC reported on it blogs and to the Town in 2022: G. Lopes Construction negligently caused dust, sand or sediment to enter the neighboring property and cause legally recoverable harm.

About the trial

The two week trial involved 10 witnesses from the plaintiffs and five from the defendants, G. Lopes Construction and Maki. The lawsuit was first filed in April 2023, when the neighbors first challenged the town’s Earth Removal Permit issued to Maki despite over 10 years of complaints from the neighborhood about noise, dust and vibration from the mine. The complaint also contained claims for nuisance, negligence and negligent trespass.

In July, 2023, the plaintiffs requested an injunction to stop the mining until the lawsuit could be resolved.  They supported the request for an injunction with the expert affidavit of Gary James, P.E. and photographs and testimony from the neighbors showing sand covering cars and the yard.  See the Affidavits Here  On  July 17, 2023, Superior Court Judge Glenny denied the injunction. The mine continued to operated until March 2024.  In the meantime, residents appealed to the Appeals Court but did not prevail and the mine kept opereating.  More available here: Appeals Court proceedings.

The trial testimony established that there were at least 54,000 truck trips through the residential neighborhood, up to 120 trips on some days, that the defendants were repeatedly notified about sand, dust and noise; a company safety official offered to power-wash the house and provided car-wash tickets because sand had blown from the site; the excavation intercepted the groundwater table; and the neighborhood relies on wells drawing from the aquifer

Scientific evidence on silica dust and wind directions

Environmental engineering expert Scott Hersey testified that that four samples collected on June 11, 2025 contained material met the conditions he identified for respirable crystalline silica (RSC). He concluded that wind conditions made it more likely than not that dust from the site reached the plaintiffs’ home and that RCS from the mining operation more likely than not entered the property.

Hersey compared approximately 1.12 million meteorological observations with 25 documented dust events and found mine-to-home winds during the preceding 24 hours for 20 of those 25 events.

Pulmonary expert evaluated possible silica-related health effects

Pulmonary specialist Stephen L. Newman, M.D., testified at the trial about a peer review of the residents’ pulmonary complaints and their possible relationship to silica-dust exposure. The medical expert did not diagnose them with silicosis, but stated that one of them was at risk for progressive silicosis and associated complications given what Dr. Newman characterized as prolonged extensive unprotected exposure to silica dust.

As to the second  resident, Dr.Newman reported bilateral lower-lobe interstitial lung disease typical of rheumatoid lung disease, with possible atypical, accelerated silicosis. He identified both prolonged silica exposure and rheumatoid arthritis in his causation analysis.

These medical opinions should be understood alongside the site’s later silica testing and dust-transport analysis. They are expert opinions; the jury verdict itself should not be characterized as a diagnosis of silicosis.

Above: March, 2022. One of many photos documenting sand emissions from the 0 Meadow Street sand mine. Expert testimony gave the opinion that to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty it was more probable than not that the sand contained RSC, a health hazard, and that the plaintiffs were exposed inside their home as well as in their yard.

Engineering and scientific experts also evaluated the operation itself

Professional Wetland Scientist Brandon Faneuf concluded that approximately the operation did not comply with the site plans and encroached within 277 of the plaintiffs’ home. He testified this was a commercial mining operation, not “cranberry agriculture” as claimed. In a separate report, Mr. Faneuf shows 19.3 acres were disturbed and that the mining exceeded the 10.99-acre excavation area depicted in the Draft Gilmore plan. He also concluded that part of the mining occurred in the federally designated Plymouth-Carver Sole Source Aquifer.

Professional engineer James DeVellis concluded that the operation more likely than not caused sand and dust to reach the Beadlings’ home and that ordinary dust-control measures expected at earth-removal operations near residences were lacking.

Role of the cranberry industry in sand mining

Like many mining operations in Southeastern Massachusetts, this mining operation dredged sand and gravel from the Sole Source Aquifer to maximize the volume of sand and gravel for commercial sale. Estimates of the commercial value of the sand and gravel is up to $11 million at today’s prices. Testimony at the trial showed G. Lopes Construction paid Maki at least $670,340 for materials removed from 2012 to about 2023. The total amount paid to Maki likely exceeded $770,000 through March 2024.

These sand and gravel dredging operations are ubiquitous throughout the region. Cranberry companies claim the dredging is part of normal cranberry operations.  They claim they are building a “water hole” or reservoir to supply their cranberry bogs, or a “tailwater pond” to collect polluted water that discharges off the bogs.  Find out more here.  Watch the short documentary,  Sand Wars: An investigation into the money, politics and corruption behind sand mining and its silent environmental crisis in Southeastern Massachusetts.  Website: www.sandwarssoutheasternma.org

Town’s role 

Sand and gravel mining extraction requires a municipal permit in Massachusetts — and little or no state permitting. In Carver, the Earth Removal Committee (ERC) is responsible for local permitting of sand and gravel mining. In 2011, the ERC granted Maki a permit for 545,000 cubic yards of earth removal for a “cranberry reservoir.”  The permit expired in 2016, but the Town allowed the operation to continue, until residents brought the situation to their attention. The Town issued a cease and desist in September 2022, but then issued a new permit allowing it to continue until March, 2024. 

The Town allowed G.Lopes Construction and Maki to operate with speeding trucks, violations of the 25-truckload per day limit, and excavation in the groundwater despite residents’ concerns.  The ERC has conflicts of interest because the majority are in the cranberry, trucking or excavation business. 

ERC issues second permit in March, 2023

Despite the harm to the residents and environment, the ERC issued Maki and Lopes a second permit in March, 2023. GAF Engineering, Lopes and Maki filed for the new earth removal permit to extend the illegal operation for another 15 months.  Speaking about the public hearings on the permit a spokesperson for Carver Concerned Citizens said,

“To say that we are disappointed is an understatement. I wonder what it is going to take for the ERC to do their job, which is to protect the residents of Carver.  I have yet to see one board in this town do the right thing. When residents showed the ERC pictures of silica sand from the operation covering their property and described the excessive and concussive noise and vibrations they have endured for a decade, causing cracks in their home’s foundations, we were treated with disrespect and dismissed. Town officials work for the residents, not for the sand and gravel industry.”

 

The public asked the ERC, Board of Selectmen, Carver Police Department, Building Inspector and Board of Health for years to protect the residents from excessive truck traffic, silica dust, noise, and vibration. Residents complaints and concerns continue to be dismissed and disregarded today. Trucks run after hours with no consequences.

State government’s role

Massachusetts officials have failed to take action to address sand and gravel mining in Southeastern Massachusetts and other parts of the state. There is no state licensing program that the sand mines follow. The Governor has ignored residents’ appeals for almost 5 years. 

State environmental and public health agencies have failed to act. One example is the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. On March 28, 2022, Ten Residents of Carver filed an appeal with the agency challenging Maki’s claim of an exemption from the Wetlands Protection Act. In 2022 the MassDEP and Environmental Strike Force did a site visit to view site. The DEP ruled on July 30, 2022 that the reservoir was three times the size needed for 12 acres of bog and was not exempt agriculture. The DEP continued to allow the mine to operate, dredging in the aquifer for another two years!

On December 5, 2022 ten residents sent a Citizens Suit Law demand letter and notice of intent to sue to the Carver Earth Removal Committee and Massachusetts Attorney General over illegal mining. It has been ignored.

 

 

 

 

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Screenshot-2026-08-13-at-10.17.21-AM.png 753 607 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2026-08-12 13:25:332026-08-22 11:10:44Carver: Meadow Street Sand Mine: Jury Returns Verdict

Carver-Plympton: Rickets Pond Sand Mining Site

July 2, 2026

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 2, 2026

Media Contact

Meg Sheehan

Contact:

meg@communitylandandwater.org

508-259-9154

Community Land & Water Coalition
P.O. Box 1699
Plymouth, MA 02362
www.communitylandandwater.org

Massachusetts Orders Full Environmental Review After Community Campaign Wins Major Victory

MEPA Requires Comprehensive Study of Proposed Development and Sand Mining Impacts on Ricketts Pond Site

PLYMOUTH, MA — The Community Land & Water Coalition (CLWC) today hailed a major environmental victory after the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) ordered a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Ricketts Pond Business Park expansion for a proposed 60-unit residential development in Carver and Plympton.

Get the MEPA Decision Here: 15883 EEA June 29, 2026 Ricketts Pond Business Park – Carver Plympton_SRT Signed

The June 29 decision rejects the developer’s request to bypass additional environmental review and instead requires a comprehensive analysis of groundwater protection, air quality, traffic, public health, climate impacts, and the cumulative effects of years of large-scale sand mining on the site.

“This decision confirms what residents, local officials, and environmental advocates have argued all along—that this project deserves a full and transparent environmental review,” said Meg Sheehan, coordinator of Community Land & Water Coalition. “The sand mining operation has destroyed every aspect of the environment that existed on the site — clear cutting Pine Barrens forests and hauling off the land itself in tractor trailer trucks for commercial sale since 2018. The public deserves answers before additional development moves forward.”

The decision follows years of advocacy by CLWC and local residents, including more than 1,600 people who participated in the MEPA process by submitting comments urging the state to require a full environmental review. The Town of Plympton Board of Health, Planning Board, and Open Space Committee also participated in urging a full environmental review.

Key Findings

A two step environment study is required under the state’s MEPA law: a draft study for public comment, and a final study. Both must cover ways to avoid or mitigate damage to the region’s sole-source drinking water aquifer; air quality from dust, and diesel emissions, traffic, groundwater withdrawals and stormwater runoff, climate resilience, cumulative impacts, environmental justice, and open space.

The Secretary also rejected the developer’s request to waive the Environmental Impact Report requirement ruling that it did not meet the requirements.

Pine duBois of Jones River Watershed Association said “ Rickett’s Pond is a neglected but important environmental resource for this area. Already water use from wells has drawn down the pond and vanquished the adjacent vernal pool. Eradication of trees and denuding hillsides adjacent to the new highway has altered the landscape and resources forever, with no consideration or forethought. We’re destroying the natural resources we all rely on for health and safety, and sacrificing opportunities for future generations to thrive, for what?”

CLWC will continue to work with the community to participate in the MEPA Environmental Impact Report process to ensure the issues identified by state agencies, local officials, and residents receive the comprehensive review required under Massachusetts environmental law.

See CLWC’s March 2026 request to MEPA here

Since 2018 CLWC and a wide grassroots network has fought to raise awareness about this sand mine. It is an approximately 40 acre site in Carver and Plympton on Route 44 going East at the Spring Street exit. Read more here

This photo below from December 5, 2021 shows the last remaining stand of trees on the hill in the center of the site.  

 

 

July 8, 2024: Third Request of enforcement of Earth removal bylaws is sent to the Town of Plympton and their Board of Selectmen. The letter asks their to be an investigation into unauthorized earth removal at the site. Read the letter here. 

June 24, 2024: New evidence alleges the mining at the site on Lot 3  is illegal and violates stormwater regulations. Read the memo here. A DEP hearing will be held on Sept. 4, at 100 Cambridge Street Suite 900, Boston, MA 02114.

May 15, 2024: CLWC sent a second demand letter to the Town of Plympton demanding that it enforce the town’s bylaws against SLT Construction. Read the letter here. May 15 2024 SLT Letter Final

July 30, 2025: A group of 10 residents sent a notice of intent to sue letter to prevent and minimize damages to the environment. Read the letter here.

The letter asserts “The evidence that SLT is engaged in large-scale earth removal on the Plympton side of the Property is indisputable.” The letter contains updated drone surveillance photos and a demand to enforce the Bylaw.

If the Town does not enforce the Bylaw, the public can go to court to enforce it.

Go to CLWC’s You Tube Channel to see drone videos like this one from December 2021 showing massive deforestation in just one day: here

Some allege SLT is at the center of a public corruption investigation by the state Office of Inspector General

Read more about SLT’s wetlands violations here. 

In January 2024, the Town of Plympton denied SLT’s request for a demolition facility that entailed removing 100,000 cubic yards. Read more here.

Read more about the SLT site’s archeological significance here.

In 2022, CLWC tried to enforce the Carver zoning laws against SLT. The Town refused to enforce the law and sided with SLT.

Read more about the public’s effort to enforce the Carver Earth Removal Bylaw against the illegal expansion of the mining operation onto the adjacent “Marob” property here.

Below: May 13, 2024. 0 Spring St. 

The OADR from 2018 and 2022 don’t account for the impact on Rickett’s Pond and its Buffering Vegetative Wetlands (BVW) caused by sand and gravel deposits from the RPBP mining site, including Lot 3. These materials have been entering Rickett’s Pond since at least 2019. Since February 2018, the Project Site has undergone complete deforestation, alteration, and excavation to remove sand and gravel. These activities have significantly affected areas protected under environmental regulations. They could potentially change groundwater levels, which might affect the hydrology of nearby wetlands. Moreover, the changes in surface runoff patterns have redirected water flow from one sub-watershed to another, directly impacting the plant life and wildlife habitats in the surrounding areas. View drone footage of the site here. 

 

May 22, 2026: Court issues injunction against SLT Construction Co. See the  Superior Court Order Injunction here    See the Town of Plympton lawsuit here  

Leading hydrologist Scott Horsley says SLT’s dense housing proposal on the sand mine in Plympton threatens Town’s drinking water. Read his comments to the Town here

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/sand-mining_2.jpg 946 1594 Meg Sheehan https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Meg Sheehan2026-07-02 12:38:012026-07-02 12:53:16Carver-Plympton: Rickets Pond Sand Mining Site

Landers Parcels Off of Hedges Pond Road….Plymouth Sold Off Another Chance for Land Justice

June 1, 2026
Read more
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-27-210545.png 992 1492 Katherine Harrelson https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Katherine Harrelson2026-06-01 19:07:082026-08-05 13:05:17Landers Parcels Off of Hedges Pond Road….Plymouth Sold Off Another Chance for Land Justice

A.D. Makepeace Co.’s Land Use Model: Cranberries, Sand, Solar, Residential/Commercial Development

April 1, 2026

Who is A.D. Makepeace Company?

A.D. Makepeace is one of the largest private landowners in Massachusetts, with extensive
holdings primarily in Plymouth, Carver, and Wareham, and Rochester. It owns about 12,000 acres. Historically, the company’s business was cranberry agriculture. Since the 1990s, Makepeace has expanded and operates across multiple industries, including:

  • Cranberry Production
  • Engineered Soil Products– Read Custom Soils (RCS)
  • Sand and Gravel Extraction
  • Large-scale Solar Development
  • Residential Development– Redbrook project in Plymouth (about 1,200 homes) and
    Rosebrook business park in Wareham
  • Motto: “Inspired by Nature”

This combination of land ownership and vertically integrated operations positions Makepeace to
control the full lifecycle of land use—from clearing to extraction to redevelopment.

A.D. Makepeace’s operations represent a significant transformation of Southeastern Massachusetts landscapes.

The rapid land use changes — from agriculture and forestry to industrial scale sand and gravel extraction, vast solar facilities and development raises significcant questions for the community:

  • How should cumulative impacts be evaluated?
  • Is the current use consistent with the intent of the Tihonet Mixed Use Development (TMUD) plan from 2005 — a promise of smart growth, open space protection and village centers?
  • What level of oversight is appropriate for projects of this scale? Where is the oversight? Who is in charge?

These issues continue to be debated in courts, town boards, and communities across the region.

Cranberries: The Historical Core — No Longer the Profit Driver

A.D. Makepeace is still:

  • the largest cranberry grower in the world
  • farming about 1,750 acres of bogs across southeastern Massachusetts according to its
    website

However, the economics of cranberry farming have changed dramatically in the last 30 years:

  • The Massachusetts Department of Agriculture has described cranberry farming as a
    “beleaguered industry”
  • Prices have declined significantly in recent years while costs have risen
  • Industry-wide, cranberry growing is often:
    • low-margin or break-even
    • dependent on subsidies and market volatility
    • every fall, excess production and low prices results in dumping a percent of the harvest

Even regional officials acknowledge cranberry growing “isn’t a booming industry.”

The Shift: From Farming to Resource Extraction

Because cranberry farming alone is no longer highly profitable:

Makepeace has shifted toward resource extraction of timber, soils and sand off its land, and
commercial and residential development:

  • Tens of millions of cubic yards of sand have been removed across hundreds of acres of its lands and
  • Sand mining continues today
  • The company now generates significant revenue from sand sales through its
    subsidiary, Read Custom Soils
  • Extraction of timber and topsoils is used to blend with the sand for commercial sale
  • Makepeace now derives at least 70% of its revenue from non-cranberry activities and all its profits, according to public sources

The Integrated Revenue Model

Step 1: Cranberry Agriculture (Entry Point)

  • Land is classified as:
    • Agricultural
  • This classification can:
    • Enable earth removal permits  — commerical sand mining is often permitted as “bog construction”
      or “reservoir creation” or claimed to be for sanding the bogs
    • Reduce regulatory scrutiny under the Wetlands Protection Act, municipal wetland bylaws, the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act, and historic preservation laws
    • Reduce real estate taxes: agricultural or forestry land has a lower tax rate allowing Makepeace to pay minimal real estate taxes

Step 2: Sand Mining (Primary Profit Engine)

  • Sand removal has surged in the last 10 years.
  • Multiple operations centered in south Carver and Wareham generate 100s hundreds of truckloads per day with multi-year excavation permits
  • Rising sand prices and demand make extraction far more profitable than farming
  • Dozens of permits in the last 30 years, hundreds of acres
  • Looking ahead:
    • In September 2024, ADM Cranberry filed a Carver Earth Removal Application for Map 131 Lots 1-2 and 1-3, west of Federal Road, seeking removal of 1,776,200 cubic yards over 3 years plus 1 year renewal. The application is on hold but likely will be reactivated. Read more on the ERC Site.
    • In April 2026, ADM Cranberry filed new plans for continued expansion of the 85 acre “bog construction” and sand mining project at 59 Federal Road in Carver
    • The “Farm of the Future” earth removal permit at Frogfoot in Plymouth is on hold, only about 25% complete but certainly Makepeace has plans to generate revenue here. Read more here:

Step 3: Read Custom Soils (Value-Added Processing)

Makepeace does not just sell raw sand.
Through its subsidiary Read Custom Soils (RCS):

  • Sand arrives from nearby deposits or quarry
  • Screening / sorting
    • separates sizes (fine, medium, coarse)
  • Stockpiling
    • large sand piles staged on site
  • Soil “blending and manufacturing: Sand, topsoils, and wood products from AD Makepeace’s land clearing are,
    • screened
    • blended
    • engineered

Products include:

  • golf course materials
  • construction aggregates
  • stormwater and structural soils

This converts raw sand and topsoils into higher-margin specialty products — Makepeace claims this is an “agricultural blending facility”

RCS acts as:

  • a regional distribution hub and trucking terminal to weigh and transship sand, aggregates and its soil products
  • fed by Makepeace land clearing/logging and mining sites around the region

Step 4: Trucking and Distribution

  • Hundreds of trucks move material daily from Makepeace’s lands and directly to customers or through Read
  • Sand and “soil products” shipped across New England

This represents a continuous cash flow from extracted materials

Step 5: Solar Development (Second Revenue Layer)

After trees and topsoil are removed and the land stripped to bare sand:

  • Land is flattened and cleared
  • Then leased for:
    • large-scale solar installations (~20-year leases)

Solar companies override local control: Makepeace has built at least 12 large ground mounted solar projects in the area already

  • In 2023, the Wareham Planning Board denied Makepeace and Borrego Solar extensions
    for the 3 new projects, based on the public health, safety and welfare, including the
    cumulative impact. Makepeace through the solar company sued the Town of Wareham to force them to issue the permits. Then, the Town and the solar company settled behind closed doors and permits were issued in 2025
  • The 3 new solar projects are:
    • 27 Charge Pond Road — Case 7-20, decision dated October 20, 2020
    • 150 Tihonet Road — Case 9-20, decision dated December 28, 2020
    • 140 Tihonet Road — Case 8-20, decision dated March 8, 2021.
      Official Wareham records also show that by 2025 the Town was still in litigation over some of
      these projects. The joint Select Board / Planning Board executive-session agenda for October 8,
      2025 lists litigation involving 27 CPR Solar1, LLC, New Leaf Energy, Inc., Wareham PV1,
      LLC, and Wareham MA 3 LLC. A later Planning Board executive-session agenda on
      December 10, 2025 lists PV1, LLC v. Town of Wareham Planning Board and MA 3 LLC, et
      al v. Town of Wareham Planning Board.
  • Looking ahead:
    • Makepeace conducting aggressive land clearing and sand mining at 0 Maple Springs Road in Wareham: Proposing a solar project under the shell name “OMSR Wareham Solar 1, LLC .” There are active Conservation/ZBA solar + battery filings in 2025.
    • Makepeace seeking permits for a large solar project at 0 Wareham Road, Carver – will clear cut 27 acres of forest. Project is in project in Riverfront Area, wetland buffer zone, and that will clear-cut 27 acres of forest. Appeal process at MassDEP/
    • Wihonet Road, Plymouth, Frogfoot Brook and trails area: CLWC appeals
      Makepeace plan to install solar project on about 40 acres of illegally filled
      wetlands. The location is also called the Canning Bogs.
    • O Golden Pond Road: sand mining, wetlands filling without permits, Carver
      issues Cease and Desist
    • North Wareham Solar: Makepeace and its affiliate REDP seeking to clear-cut 50 acres for a large ground-mounted solar project along Tihonet Road, north of the 160 Tihonet Road solar project

This land use model with solar creates:

  • long-term, steady income
  • on land already monetized through logging and mining
  • does not generate power that helps local rate payers, but rather produces energy that is
    sold throughout New England while local communities bear the burden of deforestation
    and risks to drinking water supply

Step 6: Final Development — Land Sales:, Redbrook and Beyond

After logging, sand mining extraction and sales, comes solar development or done in parallel, Makepeace develops residential and commercial projects

  • Example: Redbrook (Plymouth, MA) Master-planned village developed by Makepeace
    • Includes:
    • housing
    • commercial space
    • infrastructure

The TMUD Connection

The Tihonet Mixed Use Development (TMUD):

  • ~6,500-acre master plan from the early 2000s
  • Spans Plymouth, Carver, Wareham
  • Does not include Redbrook which is under a different MEPA review
  • Originally intended for:
    • smart growth
    • mixed-use development
    • conservation
    • approved through a special MEPA (state environmental) review process

The TMUD framework:

  • allowed large-scale land conversion
  • reduced environmental review requirements — “MEPA Light”
  • Where TMUD failed:
    • ignored sand extraction
    • did not require full “EIR”; review for 12 solar projects from 2014 to present long-term buildout
    • a “ bait and switch ” from the original TMUD plan — MEPA let Makepeace out of the MEPA review process in 2022
    • 12 solar projects covered in the TMUD, ADM released from MEPA 2022:
      • 9 complete, 3 underway

Solar and sand mining projects not covered by TMUD MEPA Certificate or any MEPA review:

  • Maple Springs Solar, Wareham
  • Cranebrook Solar, Cranberry Road, Carver
  • 0 Wareham St. Solar, Carver
  • Canning Solar, Plymouth (Frogfoot area)
  • All sand mining projects in Carver, Plymouth and Wareham are not covered by ANY MEPA REVIEW

Why This Model Is So Powerful

  • Same land generates revenue multiple times
  • Lands are stripped of all value, leaving barren wastelands
  • Land acquisition cost = zero (already owned)
  • Vertical integration = maximum control

Result:

  • Continuous, compounding income stream at the expense of biodiversity, habitat, cooling
    shade, clean air, clean water

Oversight Concerns

  1. Agricultural exemptions exploited:
    1. Mining permitted under “cranberry agriculture”
    2. Wetlands Protection Act exemptions for “Normal Improvement of Land in Agricultural Use” to evade permits
    3. Tax preferences for agriculural land exploited
  2. Fragmented permitting:
    1. Mining, solar, development reviewed separately
    2. No cumulative review
    3. Impacts not assessed as one system
    4. Environmental risks
  3. Threats to:
    1. Plymouth-Carver aquifer
    2. Pine Barrens ecosystems
    3. Community health from emissions of sand dust

Conclusion

A.D. Makepeace’s operations are no longer just agriculture — despite its image.
They represent a fully integrated land monetization system where:

  • Cranberry farming provides the legal and historical foundation
  • Sand extraction generates immediate profits
  • Read Custom Soils adds value and scale
  • Solar leases provide steady income
  • Sevelopments like Redbrook deliver long-term returns
  • The public: left with a denuded wasteland — sand mines are barren lands where “nothing much will grow in human time” and no upside from solar, rapid development that strains infrastructure, undermines rural Southeatsern Massachusettts character

The result is a multi-layered, continuous revenue model built on the same land base.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2026-03-18-at-9.53.22-PM.png 1552 1266 Katherine Harrelson https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Katherine Harrelson2026-04-01 16:01:342026-08-04 13:08:19A.D. Makepeace Co.’s Land Use Model: Cranberries, Sand, Solar, Residential/Commercial Development

Plymouth: 71 Hedges Pond Road: List of Resources

December 18, 2025

We continue to be outraged and dismayed at the ongoing destruction of history and our environment at the 71 Hedges Pond Road site. At CLWC, we aim to provide the public with the resources to take action. Here are the resources compiled to date on 71 Hedges Pond Road.

CLWC Blogs

  • Plymouth: Sand Mine at 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Destroys Environment, Native American Site
  • Plymouth: Town Meeting Article 26: Demand Transparencey

Reports

  • Shining a Light on the Plymouth Foundation

Recordings of Meetings

  • Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals April 7, 2025

Drone Footage

  • 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth, August 28, 2025
  • 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth, MA, August 19, 2025
  • 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth, MA, June 25, 2025

In the Press

  • April 23, 2025: The Bourne Enterprise: More than just soil and stone: Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe Fights Against Development on Another Burial Site
  • April 17, 2025: Cape Cod Times: Despite Opposition from Wampanoag Nation, Plymouth Project on Ancestral Land Will Continue
  • March 30, 2025: Cape Cod Times: Tribe worries business park in Plymouth could disrupt cultural burial sites and objects

Press Releases

  • Plymouth: Press Release: 3/28/25 Notice of Intent to Sue 71 Hedges Pond Road Strip Mine

Public Comments and Letters from Wampanoag Tribal Officers on 71 Hedges Pond Road

  • February 18, 2025 Letter to Governor Healey and December, 2024 Letter to Plymouth Planning Board and Select Board, Melissa Ferretti, Chairwoman, Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe, Author
    • Herring Pond Tribe Comment Letter to Planning Board 2024 (1) (1)
  • February 18, 2025, Letter to Plymouth Select Board, David Weeden, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, Author
    • February 18 2025 Weeden TPHO Statement
https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/IMG_2040-2.jpg 1155 2059 Katherine Harrelson https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Katherine Harrelson2025-12-18 15:55:552025-12-29 15:19:47Plymouth: 71 Hedges Pond Road: List of Resources
Sign at the entrance announces "Pit 40" and that the Site is regulated as a mine by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration

Plymouth: Sand Mine at 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Destroys Environment, Native American Site

November 30, 2025

Above: Dec. 3, 2025:  Sand mining destroying Cedarville Conservation Area and Native American Site at 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth MA

Above: October 15, 2025: Sand mining destroying Cedarville Conservation Area and Native American Site at 71 Hedges Pond Road, Plymouth MA. Drone videos available on YouTube here.

 

Background

Updated November, 2025

A vast tract of land known as the Cedarville Conservation Area and the Native American Wampanoag Great Lot at 71 Hedges Pond Road in Plymouth, Massachusetts is being strip mined for valuable sand and gravel. The Site is shown above in the aerial photo as of October, 2025. A private “non-profit” and regional sand mining company started clearing the land in January, 2025. The Town Select Board sold this public land to a private entity, the Plymouth Foundation, for $1.00 in 2022.

The current owner, a shell corporation named Standish Investment Group, LLC, is excavating and selling sand and gravel, starting at the top of the 150-foot hill and excavating down 90 feet deep across the Site. The sand and gravel is estimated to have a value of $12 million according to sources.

The land sale and sand mining permitting by the Town of Plymouth happened behind closed doors in secret deals involving the Select Board, Town Manager, and Town Planner. Despite the sale of this public land, the public was not made aware of the sand mining plan until late 2024 when the then owner, Plymouth Economic Development Foundation and future owner, Standish, started applying for permits. In applying for municipal permits, Standish and the Foundation claimed this was merely a plan for a “unified complex” of warehouse style buildings. It just so happened that these plans required leveling the 33 acre site and digging a 90′ hole to extract a massive volume of sand and gravel.

Against the backdrop of the extensive ongoing and historic sand mining devastating the region, the public saw through this scheme immediately. They started demanding answers.

Since late 2024, multi-pronged advocacy efforts to challenge and halt the sand mining, focusing on environmental protection, historic preservation, and procedural violations of state and municipal laws, has been underway. These efforts have resulted in extensive community mobilization and generated important court rulings. In Plymouth, they have resulted in a call to review the Town’s sand and gravel mining permit scheme. Some are calling for a complete prohibition on sand mining, as allowed under state law.

The Town refuses to shut down the mine and it is business as usual with this sand mine and others or demand an accurate independent assessment of the real volume of sand and gravel being mined and its value.

This Blog summarizes the public advocacy, issues, lawsuits,  who is involved, and future efforts to stop the destruction.

Key Facts

Background and Land Sale for Sand Mining

The land is located in the southeast part of Plymouth known as Cedarville Village. This is public land owned by Plymouth residents.  Yet, in a bait and switch, the Select Board sold the land to a private non-profit, the Plymouth Foundation for $1.00. The Foundation, using public resources and taxpayer money, subdivided the land. It then sold one of the lots to EJ Pontiff, a sand mine operator, for $3.4 million in early 2025. Read more about the Plymouth Foundation here.

This area of Plymouth has some of the last remaining areas of valuable silica sand and the surrounding sand and gravel aggregate. Decades of sand and gravel mining has leveled the topography of the Town. This mining is ongoing, as the sand and gravel industry tries to extract every shovelful for sale.

This sand mine, like others, was approved by the Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals, who claims it is merely “necessary and incidental” to normal land development.

The groundbreaking report, Sand Wars in Cranberry Country: The Money, Politics and Corrupution Behind the Silent Environmental Crisis in Southeastern Massachusetts documents approximately 41 sand mines in Plymouth alone. Some of the sand mines involve the same entities mining at 71 Hedges Pond Road — the Plymouth Foundation and E.J. Pontiff.

The 19-acre site off Route 3 in Plymouth — a “unified complex” of commercial buildings — is also a ruse for a sand mine. Four years later the Route 3 “unified complex” is a wasteland and barren sand pit. See the drone video here.

About the Hedges Pond Road Site

The Hedges Pond Road sand mine is an egregious example of the abuse of sand mining laws. The land is or was important for the following reasons:

  • Designated on official Town and state maps as the Cedarville Conservation Area — open space for recreation, hiking and wildlife habitat.
  • Historically and as of today, the area is part of the ancient Native American Wampanoag Great Lot. This is an area of land ‘allotted’ to Native Americans. Under the colonial government of Massachusetts, Native American communal lands used for traditional life ways such as hunting, fishing and gathering, were eliminated and Native Americans were required to live on the ‘lots’ assigned to them by the government.
  •  Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) Priority Habitat #521 for Rare Species.
  • Globally Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens forest.
  • Abutting residential neighborhoods.

Destruction of Native American Great Lot

Perhaps the most egregious aspect of this land destruction is that the Town and state allowed it to proceed without an archeological study. They rejected requests from the Wampanoag Tribes.

The Native American tribes,  Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe have ancestral lands that encompass the Site. The Tribes have spoken directly to Town and State officials seeking protection of this land.

“We oppose this project and the development of this area on Hedges Pond Road,” said Melissa Ferretti, Chairwoman of the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe based in Plymouth, which was called Patuxet by Indigenous People. “This location is an integral part of our original reservation lands known to us as the “Great Lot.” This project threatens to irreversibly damage our ancestral homelands, the heart of our existence and heritage here in Plymouth. The Great Lot holds immense cultural and historic significance for  our community and any development would not only harm the land but also disrupt our deep-rooted connection to it. Honoring the sacredness of these grounds is fundamental to our community and culture,” Ferretti stated. In November 2024, Governor Healy issued an Executive Order granting the Tribe state recognition, a major accomplishment.

 

Speaking at the February 11, 2025 Town of Plymouth Select Board meeting, Indigenous youth urged the Town to, “At least consider and possibly even invite people from her tribe and other neighboring sister tribes to have discussions about these matters and include them in them.”

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Chief Brian Weeden testified at the April 7, 2025 public hearing to the Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals:

“This is happening right in our own backyard. And it is our duty to speak on behalf of our sister tribes. And it’s—it’s not appropriate because, you know, you all have been robbing graves for the past 400 years since you stepped off that boat”…“But enough is enough. If somebody was digging up your grandparents and your great ancestors, what would you do?”.

 

 

April 7, 2025 Plymouth Town Hall: Mashpee Wampanoag Chairman Brian Weeden addresess Plymouth Zoning Board of Appeals. Available on You Tube at 1:16:05. 

A February 13, 2025 letter in the Plymouth Independent describes how the project tramples Indigenous rights.

Advocacy & Lawsuits

Overview

Months of grassroots advocacy at all levels of government did not stop the illegal sale of the Conservation Area to Standish Investment by the Foundation. It did not stop the Town of Plymouth from issuing permits. Land clearing and logging started in early 2025.

The Town refused to issue a cease and desist for a pause for an archeological study to be conducted and to have questions answered.

With no option but the courts, residents and the grassroots group Community Land & Water Coalition filed lawsuits to obtain justice for the community and the environment.

A writer to the Plymouth Independent says the Plymouth Foundation, not taxpayers, should pay the legal fees of these challenges.

As of November 2025, three major legal challenges are pending. These are summarized below.

Below: Logging Cedarville Conservation Area, Feb. 2025. 

Damage to the Environment Lawsuit

Lawsuit filed April, 2025

On April 17, 2025, a Group of More than Ten Residents filed a lawsuit in Superior Court under the state’s Citizen Suit Law for Damage to the Environment in violation of environmental protection laws. See the complaint here: More Than Ten Residents v Town of Plymouth and Others. The lawsuit followed a  Notice of Intent to Sue issued to Standish, the Foundation, Town and Attorney General on March 28, 2025. The notice letter was ignored by all of them. CLWC’s March 28, 2025 Press Release here describes the Citizen Suit law and the claims in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges the Select Board, Town Manager and Town Planner failed to follow the steps for selling conservation land according to the lawsuit. It seeks to halt all activity, void the land sale, and compel restoration of the site or mitigation.

Court denies injunction, June, 2025

In late April, 2025, the Group’s lawyers asked the Court for an injunction to shut down the mine pending the outcome of the lawsuit.  April 29, 2025, the Group submitted its Memorandum supporting the request for an injunction here.

The  Group also submitted three affidavits about the values of the Conservation Area and how the public used it for open space and recreation and its importance to the Wampanoag people. The affidavits testified that residents used the Cedarville Conservation Area for hiking and recreation during the 21 years since it was established in 1993. This established its status as conservation land that could not be sold without a 2/3 vote of the state Legislature and other steps.

The Town, Standish, and the Foundation hit back with an Emergency Motion to Continue (here) and their Memo in Support of the Motion to Continue (here).

On May 2, 2025, the Court held a hearing on the injunction. The court room was filled to capacity with concerned residents. Attorney Caroline Smith from the Boston environmental law firm of McGregor, Legere and Stevens argued for the Group that the injunction is urgently needed to prevent further damage to the environment by the sand mining operation.

The Town, Foundation and Standish challenged the Group’s standing and timeliness, while the Town argued the land was not protected open space. Lawyer Geoffrey Raux of the Boston law firm of Foley argued for Pontiff. Plymouth Town Counsel Kate McKay argued that the land was never in open space and recreation and therefore never protected. Attorney Smith countered with maps and the Town’s Open Space and Recreation plans listing the 40 acres as a permanently protected conservation area.

Before the hearing, residents and supporters held signs outside the courthouse and expressed their concern about sand mining in general throughout the region and the lack of accountability for this tragic destruction of forests and a Native American cultural site.

On June 18, 2025, Judge Glenny denied the injunction, allowing mining to proceed during litigation. This ruling meant ongoing environmental destruction was not halted by the court, exacerbating harm to the native ecosystem and cultural heritage. The denial did not stop the Group from pursuing the lawsuit.

Court sides with Group, denies motion to dismiss, November 2025

The Town, Foundation and Standish challenged the Group’s Damage to the Environment lawsuit with a “motion to dismiss.” Following a court hearing, on November 24, 2025, Judge Leighton ruled in favor of the Residents Group on three key points: standing, timeliness and the purpose of Article 97.

This is a major victory and allows the case  continue toward trial. Read the Decision here: Nov. 26, 2025 Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss

Read our press release here: 2025.12.01 Press Release

Zoning Violations Lawsuit

Background on Municipal Regulation of Sand Mining

Sand mining is regulated in the first instance at the municipal level in Massachusetts. This means local land use laws, either zoning or general bylaws, may control, limit or prohibit sand mining. Plymouth’s Zoning Bylaws have “Earth Removal Regulations” requiring different levels of permits depending on the size and purpose of the earth removal. This requires community engagement to ensure proper enforcement and administration of sand mining laws. The community engaged in months of efforts to stop the Hedges Pond Road sand mine.

Community advocacy included:

  • Public comments to the Planning Board;
  • A petition to the Select Board, Planning Board and Building Inspector to deny or require a special permit;
  • An appeal to the Building Inspector to issue a cease and desist once the clear cutting started, which was denied; and
  • An appeal to the ZBA and public hearings on the Building Inspector’s refusal to enforce the Zoning Law.

Read the CLWC Feb. 14, 2025  Press Release here on the Zoning Appeals

Town issues Zoning and Building Permit, January 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Town Building Inspector issued building and zoning permits to Standish Investments for a 300,000 square foot “unified complex” of warehouses, asserting that the earth removal (sand mining) was “necessary and incidental” “site preparation” for the massive warehouse style buildings. The buildings just happen to cooincide with the size of the lot — almost 33 acres. The Foundation and Pontiff immediately started sand mining in January 2025 once the permits were issued. These were issued behind closed doors — with no public notice.

The Permits did not include sufficient conditions to mitigate airborne silica dust, a known carcinogen, endangering public health and drinking water supplies for the entire area. The permits were issued despite the community’s request that the Town’s land use officials deny the sand mining as not allowed in the zoning district, or at least require a “special permit” — the highest level of protection. The commencement of the mining operation led to clear-cutting of ancient trees and major landscape disruption before the legal appeal period had expired. This prompted an emergency cease-and-desist demand. The ZBA and Building Inspector denied the cease and desist. Despite these appeals and public outcry, work continued.

Community seeks zoning enforcement, Town denies demand

In February 2025, CLWC’s legal staff and volunteers brought legal appeals at the Town level that demanded demand to halt operations were filed after the start of tree clearing. CLWC and residents argued that the project was proceeding without archaeological or environmental studies and in violation of state and federal protections for burial and historic sites. The appeal demanded a public hearing and challenged the town’s reliance on the “unified complex” pretext to avoid stricter special permitting and public scrutiny. See the 2/14/25 Notice of Appeal and  the 3/3/25 Appeal of Refusal to Issue Cease and Desist

See the Plymouth Independent March 1, 2025 story on the appeal here.

The Zoning Board of Appeals was required to hold hearings on whether to uphold the Zoning Permit. The ZBA process was criticized due to potential conflicts of interest; two ZBA members held director positions with the Plymouth Foundation, the original recipient of the land and permit.

The Plymouth Independent story on March 13, 2025 “Recusals Delay Appeal” described the conflicts of interest.

The appeal highlighted the project’s use of the “unified complex” designation to bypass stricter controls, and underscored deficiencies in transparency and public participation.

 

Above: May, 2025. Public packs the Plymouth Town Hall for a public hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals for a cease and desist of the sand mining at 71 Hedges Pond Road and demands a permit revocation.

Site Plans used to obtain permits

The site plans the Building Inspector relied on to issue the permits are defective, as shown below.  See the Pontiff/Standish’s permit submittals to the Town here:

Standish Investments 5/21/24 Submittal Letter 

Standish Investments 11/24 Revised Grading Plans 

Standish Investments 11/24 Flaherty & Stefani  Revised Plans Letter

Zoning Lawsuit filed 

 When the ZBA refused to enforce the Bylaw after the public hearings, CLWC and volunteers are representing neighbors harmed by the sand mining. They have brought a lawsuit challenging the ZBA Decision to allow the project without complying with the Bylaw. The case asserts:

  • The project is prohibited and violates the Zoning Bylaw because it is industrial use prohibited in the zoning district;
  • Alternatively, the ZBA should have required a Special Permit under the Earth Removal Regulation because the mining is not “necessary and incidental” to an end use that has all its permits;
  • The plans do not meet the Natural Features Conservation regulations of the Zoning Bylaw – for example it does not retain topography to maximum extent possible, allows destruction of historical lands of Native American Wampanoag people, has insufficient conditions to mitigate airborne silica dust, a known carcinogen, and is endangering public health and drinking water supplies for the entire area.

See the Zoning Lawsuit here.Chelsey Adams et al v Plymouth ZBA et al Complaint w Exhibits

The Town, Standish and the Foundation have moved to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of legal standing. They say the plaintiffs who live next to the mine cannot show any “harm.” The neighbors have submitted sworn court testimony of noise, dust and vibration being caused by the mining operation. Scott Hersey, PhD has submitted an affidavit stating that the sand is believed to be carcinogenic silica dust and the neighbors, if exposed, would suffer life long health impacts.

The case is scheduled for a hearing.

 Building Permit Appeal

In March, 2025, CLWC appealed the Town Building Inspector’s Building Permit under the Building Code to the Building Code Appeals Board (BCAB).

In expert testimony and legal arguments, CLWC identified major Massachusetts Building Code violations in the Town’s Building Permit. These include missing construction documents, inadequate fire safety plans, no geotechnical invesetigation and missing specifications for energy compliance.

Read more here about CLWC’s appeal:

  • Letter of Appeal t0 the BCAB 2025.07.08 BCAB 25-043 Appellants Memo_
  • CLWC’s testimony from A. Vernon Woodworth, FAIA Expert Testimony BCAB Hedges Pond Road July 2025
  • CLWC presentation to BCAB BCAB 25-043 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Plymouth Building Permit Appeal 7_10_2025 Presentation

Demanding Accountability

Plymouth Select Board

The Town’s Select Board is ultimately responsible for this unlawful and unnecessary environmental and cultural destruction of Plymouth’s landscape.   

The Select Board:

  • Sold the land to the Plymouth Foundation for $1.00;
  • Has consistently rejected public calls for accountability and transparency about the sale and sand mining, even treating Indigenous Youth and others with disrepect during a public hearing;
  • Went along with the Zoning Board of Appeals that refused to use its power to enforce the Earth Removal Regulation of the Zoning Bylaw;
  • Is responsible to ensure that the Building Inspector follows the Building Code: he did not;
  • Holds a director position on the Plymouth Foundation; and
  • Allows Town employees to serve on the Plymouth Foundation while working on the sand mining deal behind closed doors — the Town Manager, Town Planner, and members of boards and committees are on the Foundation.

The permits were issued despite the community’s request that the Town’s land use officials deny the sand mining as not allowed in the zoning district, or at least require a “special permit” — the highest level of protection.

 Plymouth Foundation

The Plymouth Foundation claims it is a private non profit and does not comply with the Open Meeting Law — yet it collects money from the sale of public lands. This is a shadow government, made up of developers that has been getting sand mining permits from the Town’s ZBA for decades — and collecting revenue from the sales.

CLWC published an expose report, Shining the Light on the Plymouth Foundation May 2025 

Plymouth Planning Board 

This is an elected board of the Town responsible for overseeing these projects. It went along with the scheme and issued a Recommendation that the project be approved in December 2024. The Board ignored the letter from the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe for an archeological study. See the 12/24 Herring Pond Letter here. It ignored the recommedation of the Cedarville Steering Committee to reject the project.

Plymouth Director of Inspectional Services

The director  issued zoning and building permits. 

The public sent over 1,000 letters demanding that the Director (Building Inspector) require a special permit under the Town’s Zoning Bylaw. This was ignored. The permits were issued without notifying the public.

Plymouth Conservation Commission

It approved a permit to destroy wetland with plan for “replication” — and based on material misrepresentations by the Foundation and Standish that “150 acres” had been permanently protected as conservation land as mitigation for the 33 acres of destruction – when this was not true. The Commission asked no questions. See the Commission’s documents:

Standish 6/24 NOI 

Commission 7/16/24 Meeting Minutes 

Commission 8/5/24 Order of Conditions 

E.J. Pontiff and companies

Pontiff has operated sand and gravel mines throughout the area for decades, including at 140 Firehouse Road in Plymouth. Currently, the company is expanding a 50-acre mine in Carver.

Timeline

Date Description
1977 The Town of Plymouth obtains the Cedarville Conservation Area property (Lots 22B, 23, and 24) by tax taking for the purpose of building a landfill, which is never built.
1993 – 2025 The Town designates the Cedarville Conservation Area for public use as open space and conservation land.
April 3, 1993 Town Meeting votes unanimously to change the purpose of the Cedarville Conservation Area land from municipal to open space/conservation purposes, dedicating it to conservation under the Conservation Commission.
1996 – 2017 Town Open Space Committee and Planning Board include the Conservation Area in their plans as dedicated for conservation purposes.
2018 Town Meeting votes on Articles 26 and 27 to transfer portions of the land between the Conservation Commission and the Board of Selectmen, requiring compliance with Article 97.
July 2022 The Select Board sells the Cedarville Conservation Area to the Plymouth Foundation for $1.00 without following Article 97 and other legal requirements.
January 16, 2025 The Town’s Building Inspector issues zoning and building permits to Standish Investments for a 300,000 square foot complex, including sand mining, at 71 Hedges Pond Road.
February 7, 2025 The Plymouth Foundation sells the Cedarville Conservation Area to Standish Investments LLC/Eric Pontiff for $3.4 million and provides a $350,000 mortgage to Pontiff.
February 11, 2025 Indigenous youth speak at the Select Board meeting, urging inclusion of tribes in discussions about the sand mining project.
February 14, 2025 Seven Wampanoag Nation members and six Plymouth residents file legal appeals challenging the Town’s permits for the sand mine and development at 71 Hedges Pond Road, and CLWC files a demand for a cease and desist after confirming that work began before the legal appeal period expired.
February 14, 2025 Tree clearing begins at 71 Hedges Pond Road, cutting down ancient trees on Wampanoag lands.
February 16, 2025 7:00 PM CLWC holds its second public forum on sand and gravel mining in Plymouth.
March 3, 2025 Second day of Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing on a proposal by PA Landers to expand a nearby sand and gravel mine, adjacent to 71 Hedges Pond Road.
March 24, 2025 Drone video shows the denuded Cedarville Conservation Area site after logging, stump removal, and grading by Standish Investments.
March 25, 2025 A Citizen Group of 24 residents delivers a Notice of Intent to Sue to the Select Board, Plymouth Foundation, and Standish Investments regarding the sand mining operation at 71 Hedges Pond Road.
March 28, 2025 Press release issued announcing the legal challenge to the sand mine under the Citizen Suit Law.
April 7, 2025 Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Chief Brian Weeden speaks at a public hearing, condemning the sand mining project and its impact on Native American graves and heritage.
April 7, 2025 6:00 PM Public hearing scheduled at Plymouth Town Hall regarding the zoning and building permits for the sand mining project.
April 17, 2025 After over seven months of advocacy, a group of More than Ten Residents files a lawsuit in Superior Court challenging the sand mining project.
April 19, 2025 Blog post or report date summarizing the lawsuit against the Town, Foundation, and Standish.
April 29, 2025 The Ten Residents submit a Memorandum of Law and three affidavits supporting their request for an injunction to halt the sand mining project.
May 2, 2025 Court hearing held on the Residents Group’s request for an injunction to stop the sand mining project, with arguments presented by both sides.
June 18, 2025 Judge Glenny denies the Group’s request for an injunction to stop the sand mining pending the outcome of the case.
November 25, 2025 Judge Leighton rules for the Group and against the Town, allowing the case to proceed to trial.

Find Out More

Press and Media

 

Cape Cod Times

March, 2025

 April 15, 2025

Plymouth Independent

February 12, 2025: Permit should not have been issued: Letter to the Editor

April 10, 2025: ZBA Votes

April 19, 2025 Opponents Sue

November 13, 2025: What is the Plymouth Foudation About?

 

Stay involved! Don’t let this happen again!

 

CLWC will continue to pursue accountability and appropriate mitigation for the tragic loss of the Cedarville Conservation Area and the Herring Pond Wampanoag Great Lot.

The Foundation, the Town, and EJ Pontiff claim this is a “unified complex” for a hockey rink, warehouse, and two lumber yards. The site is listed for sale. Are the new owners committed to these uses? Or was this “complex” concocted to obtain as much sand and gravel as possible?

 

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PIt-Sign-at-71-Hedges-Pond-Road.png 1418 2126 Meg Sheehan https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Meg Sheehan2025-11-30 05:59:062025-12-29 15:20:24Plymouth: Sand Mine at 71 Hedges Pond Rd. Destroys Environment, Native American Site

Carver: AD Makepeace expands mine at 46 Federal Road

May 29, 2025

June 18, 2026 BREAKING NEWS: Conservation Law Foundation announces intent to sue AD Makepeace Co. for wetlands violations in Plymouth

 

AD Makepeace’s wetlands filling at the Wankinko Bogs in Carver at 46 Federal Road are the subject of a notice of intent to sue by Conservation Law Foundation. Read CLF’s letter here.

Excerpt from CLF’s letter:

The Wankinko Bogs Site is within an approximately 538-acre parcel identified by the Town of

Carver Assessor as Map 131, Lot 2-4. The wetlands at the Site included a perennial stream that connected to the Wankinco River. The Wankinco River flows through Tihonet Pond and into the Wareham River. These waters constitute waters of the United States. A.D. Makepeace engaged in commercial sand and gravel mining at the Wankinko Bogs Site since 2011. In doing so, it has strip-mined or plans to strip-mine approximately 60 acres of wetlands. Between June 2012 and May 2015, A.D. Makepeace filled the perennial stream, permanently eliminating it. The discharged dredged or fill material remains in place. A.D. Makepeace also entirely filled portions of the wetlands in order to build trucking roads to facilitate its mining operations.

Upon information and belief, A.D. Makepeace did not obtain an individual permit from USACE to discharge dredged or fill materials into waters of the United States at the Wankinko Bogs Site, nor did it obtain coverage under a general permit.

MAY 2026: MassDEP judge says AD Makepeace violates state Wetlands Protection Act by mining without a valid permit;  mischaracterizes sand and gravel as “agriculture”

On May 12, 2026, a MassDEP Presiding Officer found ADM Cranberry conducted sand mining in a wetland buffer zone in violation of the Wetlands Protection Act while an appeal was pending. The judge also found AD Makepeace’s project was not “agriculture” for purposes of the wetlands law, but commercial and agricultural. This sets a major precedent for all the region’s sand mines that claim their sand mining is “agriculture.” The judge found Makepeace must comply with the state stormwater rules. Read the Decision here:

MassDEP Decision on AD Makepeace Sand Mine

  • Decision was in response to CLWC appeal of Town of Carver wetlands permit to allow AD Makepeace mining expansion

  • In May 2024 the Earth Removal Committee gave AD Makepeace its 13th sand mining for “cranberry agriculture” since 2003

  • Earth Removal Committee admits bogs not built in 20 years, issues permit anyway 

  • Residents suffer from noise, dust, excessive truck traffic, threats to drinking water wells

Above: April, 2025. AD Makepeace Co. sand mining operation at 46 Federal Road, Carver, MA. The mine started in 2011 and has continued expanding since. As of 2025 it covers about 60 acres. The company claims it is building cranberry bogs. This claim is used to evade local land use laws. See the drone footage here.

May, 2024: Town of Carver issues 13th sand mining permit to AD Makepeace Co.

In March, 2024, the Town of Carver Earth Removal Committee (ERC) granted AD Makepeace Co. the 5th sand mining permit for 46 Federal Road. The mine has been operating since 2011. Today the mine covers about 60 acres. Makepeace claims mining 60 acres is necessary to build 23 acres of bogs. At this location, Makepeace has mined sand worth at least  $60 million in sand according to recent price information.  The cranberry bogs are not built and it has not harvested one cranberry in 14 years of mining.

The ERC issued the “earth removal” permits under the claim that the mining is “necessary” to level the land for a cranberry bog and “incidental” to using the land for agriculture. It is not. Makepeace uses the sand and gravel to supply is its commercial aggregate business Read Custom Soils located on the same site.

The ground-breaking investigative report Sand Wars in Cranberry Country explains how AD Makepeace and other cranberry companies evade the laws to get sand mining permits.

For the 2024  Earth Removal Bylaw permit application Makepeace recycled old plans from 2011 called “Cranberry Bog Development and Earth Removal Plan.”

This site is one of seven Makepeace mining sites in the south Carver area.

Mining harms Environmental Justice neighborhood, environment

Local residents challenged the May 2024 earth removal permit for 46 Federal Road in court. They exercised their rights under the law to protect their health, homes and their environment including their drinking water.  See lawsuit here. 

A court dismissed the case on “standing” grounds saying the residents are not harmed. Those living in Cranberry Village, a mobile home park, know better. The mining is happening over the Carver aquifer protective district.  The mining threatens drinking water according to world renown expert Scott Horsley. The mining exposes the Environmental Justice community to sand dust, excessive noise, and diesel emissions from incessant trucks.

Town ERC sided with Makepeace in getting the case dismiss — ignoring the rights of its own residents to be free from harm from sand mining.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png 0 0 Meg Sheehan https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png Meg Sheehan2025-05-29 13:37:252026-07-19 17:42:47Carver: AD Makepeace expands mine at 46 Federal Road

Wareham: Voters Seek Accountability for AD Makepeace Co. Sand Mining

May 25, 2025

 

  • Select Board yet to act on 2021, 2023 Town Meeting calls to hold Makepeace accountable

  • Letter says Makepeace deprived the Town of a least $625,000 in earth removal fees

Background

AD Makepeace Co. is based in Wareham MA. It is one of the state’s largest private landowners, with about 12,000 acres in Wareham, Carver and Plymouth. Makepeace owns a large portion of the Town of Wareham and has considerable political clout in the Town. The company regularly donates to charitable causes and hosts recreational events to solidify its power– even “Arbor Day” which some find ironic due to the company’s massive destruction of forests and the environment. The Save the Pine Barrens You Tube channel is documenting Makepeace’s sand mining. 

Makepeace’s core business is selling the sand from its mines via its sister company Read Custom Soils. Makepeace sells to industrial and commercial customers like concrete and asphalt facilities, golf courses, and more.  Sand and gravel sales are highly profitable and prices have gone up 5 times in the last 5 years. Makepeace is also a cranberry grower but that business is  break even business at best. Makepeace is also in the business of residential real estate development and industrial solar installations. 

Read more in Sand Wars In Cranberry Country here.

Cranberry farming gives Makepeace a cover for its sand mining. It claims the sand mining is exempt from laws because it is “farming” and entitled to special protections. Read more about how the cranberry industry evades laws on sand mining in the Sand Wars report here.

Below: 85 acre AD Makepeace sand mine in Carver, MA. Makepeace claims this is cranberry agriculture. It put in a solar project to the left after sand mining and stripping 50 acres of pristine Pine Barrens forest starting in 2016.

Makepeace sand mining in Wareham

Makepeace has been sand mining for commercial sale in Wareham for decades. Residents observe the endless number of trucks leaving loaded with sand. The trucks are a safety hazard on the roads, destroy roads, and operate recklessly. Examples of the excessive truck traffic is on You Tube. 

Makepeace has mined at least 2.5 million cubic yards from Wareham leveling up to 250 acres of forest. More mining is proposed at 140 Tihonet Road and possibly other locations. At today’s prices, the sand is worth up to $40 million.

Below: Google Earth aerial image of some mining sites in Wareham marked with yellow pin. Most are AD Makepeace, but other cranberry companies and sand and gravel companies operate without permits or in violation of permits.

Makepeace often portrays its sand mining as “site preparation” for industrial solar. The state has allowed Makepeace to destroy Priority Habitat for rare and endangered species in Warehan claiming that the sand mining is just site preparation for solar. For example in 2015, the state Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program issued a take permit for over 50 acres of Priority Habitat and 12 species at the 160 Tihonet Road mining site that is now solar. Read more here. 

“The site was formerly used for sand mining, which cleared the site of vegetation….Because sand mining is ongoing, site grades fluctuate; final grades will range from 54 ft to 64 ft NAVD.” 

Makepeace mining violates Wareham Earth Removal Bylaw for over a decade

Wareham regulates earth removal.  The Earth Removal Bylaw requires a permit and strict plan conditions to protect the environment and residents, and requires mining companies to pay 25 cents per cubic yard for sand removed. A typical tractor trailer is about 24 cubic yards and would owe a fee of $6.00 — a small amount compared to the value of the sand.

The Town Select Board is responsible for the Earth Removal Bylaw. It must ensure that companies doing mining get permits and comply with them. This includes paying fees.

Below: Excerpt from Town of Wareham General Bylaw, Earth Removal Regulations, Section 4, requiring fees of 25 cents per cubic yard of earth removed.

The Select Board has never applied or enforced the Wareham Earth Removal Bylaw against Makepeace and only rarely against other companies. The chair of the Select Board confirmed this in a 2021 Letter.

By allowing Makepeace to mine without a permit the Select Board deprived  Wareham of up to $625,000 in revenue.

October 2021: voters approve sand mining audit, collection of fees, penalties

In response to growing alarm about the scope and scale of Makepeace’s sand mining and environment destruction, Wareham voters proposed a Town Meeting warrant article.  Article 18 urged the Select Board to audit Makepeace’s mining.  The article passed almost unanimously. Read the Wareham Week story here.

Below: Town of Wareham Town Meeting Warrant Article 18, October, 2021. It requires an audit a four AD Makepeace mining sites, and others.

 

 December 4, 2021: Select Board votes to hire an expert

In response to the Town’s vote to approve Article 18, the audit, the Wareham Select Board met and on December 4, 2021 voted 4-1 to proceed with the audit and collection of fees and penalties.  On January 4, 2022, the Board discussed the topic again. Read the Wareham Week story here.

The story reported a resident said the petitioner was “an unambiguous complaint” to the town about possible earth removal bylaw violations.”

At the January 4, 2022 Select Board meeting member Peter Teitelbaum, a Makepeace supporter, complained that seeking to enforce the bylaw was a “slippery slope”. Barry Cosgrove who proposed the Town Meeting Article in 2021 commented:

“If fulfilling a legal obligation under bylaw and respecting the will of the people is a slippery slope, what is the metaphor for ignoring a legal obligation and ignoring the will of the people?”

November 2022: group requests Town enforce Earth Removal Bylaw

With Makepeace’s sand and gravel mining continuing to ravage Wareham, local advocacy group Save the Pine Barrens sent a demand for enforcement of the Earth Removal Bylaw to the Town. The Town ignored the demand.

See the Enforcement Demand letter here. It documents violations at six locations including 160 Tihonet Road, Farm to Market Road and mining by cranberry companies Sure-Cran, Rounseville Hammond, and Fletcher, and a pit operated by Graziano.

March 2023: Ten Residents Group sends Notice of Intent to Sue 

Still seeking action from the Town on sand mining, on March 17, 2023, a Ten Residents Group invoked the Massachusetts Citizen Suit Law, Chapter 214, 7A. Under this law, they can seek remedies for Damage to the Environment from Makepeace’s sand mining. Read the Wareham Ten Residents Notice Intent to Sue here.  

Notice letter focuses on three Makepeace mining sites in Wareham and estimates the company removed at least 2.5 million cubic yards without permits. This deprived the Town of $625,000 in earth removal fees.  

Read the A.D.Makepeace Reply to Notice of Intent to Sue 2023.04.14 here. Neither the Town nor the Attorney General responded. The matter is pending.

 April 2023: Wareham voters approve funding for sand mining investigation

Over a year passed with no action on the 2021 to audit Makepeace’s sand mining and collect fees and penalties. In April 2023, the voters approved spending $50,000 for a sand mining investigation. Read the Wareham Week story here.

Read the Wicked Local story here: Expert opinion could quell earth removal ‘innuendo’ in Wareham

April 2024: still no action on voter’s call for sand mining investigation

As of April, 2024, the Wareham Select Board was still discussing how to carry out the 2021 voter’s Article 18 for an audit, penalties and fees for sand mining. Read the Wareham Week story here. In the meantime, sand mining continues. 

 

Above: AD Makepeace sand mining, Farm to Market Road, Wareham, 2021. Image shows excavation into side of hill.

Makepeace claims of cranberry farming don’t add up

Makepeace has claimed time and again that earth removed from Wareham is for its “agricultural operations” such as building, refurbishing and winter sanding its own cranberry bogs. 

Makepeace has mined enough sand around the region to fill Gillette Stadium about 2 miles high. The  region-wide math does not add up. Nor do the Makepeace claims that the mining operations are “necessary” to build new agricultural projects. Read more about the laws and how they are evaded in Sand Wars.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Screen-Shot-2022-05-01-at-11.34.02-PM.png 694 724 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2025-05-25 06:46:002025-12-29 16:28:32Wareham: Voters Seek Accountability for AD Makepeace Co. Sand Mining

Plymouth: Hedge’s Pond Road Sand Mining: Lawsuit against Town, Foundation, Standish

April 19, 2025

On April 17, 2025, a group of 20 “persons” filed a lawsuit in Plymouth Superior Court against the Town of Plymouth, the Plymouth Foundation and Standish Investments LLC (EJ Pontiff). The lawsuit claims  the Select Board and the Plymouth Foundation unlawfully transferred the Cedarville Conservation Area without following Article 97 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution and other laws.

The lawsuit is under the State’s Citizen Suit Law, General Laws Chapter 214, Section 7A. The law gives a group of “at least ten persons” to sue to stop “actual or probable” damage to the environment when the activities violate an environmental law. A corporation, such as CLWC, is considered a “person” under the Citizen Suit Law. CLWC is a member of the “More Than Ten Residents” group.

Goals

The lawsuit asks the Superior Court to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to halt all activities and declare the sales null and void. It seeks an order requiring the Town to put 135 acres, as promised and as required, into conservation.  It also asks for restoration of the Site. 

History of the land

The land is the ancestral homelands of the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe.

Below: Cedarville Conservation Area, 4/7/2025 after strip mining starts.

  1. 1977:  Town obtains the property  (three separate parcels Lots 22B, 23, and 24 on Assessor’s Map 55) by tax taking. The purpose was to build a landfill.  This was never built.
  2. 1993: Town Meeting votes to conserve the land. At the April 3, 1993 Town Meeting voters voted  to change the purpose of the land from “municipal purposes” to “open space/conservation purposes.” Article 34 passed unanimously. The vote directed Town staff and officials to hold the land under the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission. This dedicated the land to open space and conservation.
  3. 1993 to 2025: Town designates “Cedarville Conservation Area” and public use. 
  4. 1996: Town Open Space Committee, Planning Board include Conservation Area in their plans.  The 1996 plan described the area as dedicated for conservation purposes. Plans in 2003, 2010, and 2017 continued to list the Cedarville Conservation Area as open space managed by the Conservation Commission.
  5. 2018 Town Meeting vote  on Articles 26 and 27 to transfer portions of the land from the Conservation Commission to the Board of Selectmen for general municipal purposes. Article 27 aimed to transfer remaining portions back to the Conservation Commission for conservation purposes. Because the land was protected, the Town had to comply with Article 97.
  6. 2022: Select Board sells to Plymouth Foundation for $1.00. After the Town Meeting voted in 2018, the Town and Foundation were required to follow Article 97 and other laws. They did not. They did not put the required 135 acres into conservation.
  7. February 7, 2025: Plymouth Foundation sells to Standish Investment Group, LLC/Eric Pontiff for $3.4 million. The Town/Foundation also gave Pontiff a mortgage for about $350,000 to help pay him buy the land. Read more about the Foundation here.

 

Find out more

See the Citizen Suit Lawsuit here.

Court filings here on Superior Court website.

Zoning Board of Appeals April 17, 2025 Decision here

March 24, 2025 Citizen Suit Law Notice Letter here.

https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-19-at-2.46.59 PM.png 1630 1308 CLwpBS https://communitylandandwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/FINAL-CLWC-LOGO-no-background-297x300.png CLwpBS2025-04-19 15:08:102025-12-29 16:21:34Plymouth: Hedge’s Pond Road Sand Mining: Lawsuit against Town, Foundation, Standish
Page 1 of 9123›»

Archives by Month

Tags

AD Makepeace Aquifer Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens Battery battery bomb Biodiversity Carver Carver MA corruption Craig Weston Cranberry cranberry bog Cranberry Country Corruption Cranberry County Corruption Deforestation DOER drinking water Earth removal Endangered Species Extinction Federal Road Forests Groundwater Indigenous Sovereignty Jim Kane Makepeace Massachusetts mining Pine Barrens Plymouth Reckless Development Resources sand and gravel Sand mining Solar Solar gone wrong Sole Source Aquifer strip mine Strip Mining Wareham Water water quality Wetlands Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Violations

Community Land and Water Coalition

P.O. Box 1699, Plymouth, MA 02362
Email
Phone: 508-259-9154

Please consider making a donation to help strengthen our impact!

DONATE

You can sign our Sand Mining Petition to Governor Healy and town Selectboards here

Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
YouTube
Instagram
Tiktok
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Join Our Email List

    Copyright © Community Land & Water Coalition   |   Privacy Policy   |   Site By LW Creative
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Youtube
    • TikTok
    Scroll to top